Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Facilitating Self-Regulation in Higher Education Through Self-Report

  • Published:
Learning Environments Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

For the purpose of examining a tool to enable students in higher education to systematically reflect on their own self-regulation, a modified version of the Martinez-Pons Scale of Self-Regulation was used in a cohort study of 75 first-year undergraduate students in a Scottish University. Statistical analyses of the data revealed that, consequent to the intervention, participants reported greater use of self-regulatory behaviour. The reported change is explored through the lenses of expertise, pedagogy and personal epistemology. While this study cannot explain the detail of this reported change, its purpose was nevertheless met insofar as a structured self-recording instrument, to focus and inform students on the nature and effectiveness of their current learning behaviour, could be a useful and readily-available pedagogic tool for higher education tutors who wish some support in their practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M. (1999). Self-regulated learning: Where we are today. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 445–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., & Minnaert, A. (1999). Self-regulation with respect to informal learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 533–544.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, J. (2002). Social constructivist teaching: Affordances and constraints. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D., & Winne, P. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J., & Newman, S. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing and mathematics. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning and instruction (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cramer, D. (1998). Fundamental statistics for social research. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlgren, L. (1997). Learning conceptions and outcomes. In F. Marton, D. Hounsell, & N. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 23–38). Edinburgh, Scotland: Scottish Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eraut, M. (1994). Developing professional knowledge and competence. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice. In C. Desforges & R. Fox (Eds.), Teaching and learning: The essential readings (pp. 4–37). London: Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P., & Newby, T. (1996). The expert learner: Strategic, self-regulated, and reflective. Instructional Science, 24, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S., & Taylor, S. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagné, R. (1970). The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. (1994). Regulating motivation and cognition in the classroom: The role of self-schemas and self-regulatory strategies. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 127–153). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R. (1991). The maturing of the relationship between the science of learning and cognition and educational practice. Learning and Instruction, 1, 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, R., & Chi, M. (1988). Overview. In M. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv–xxvii). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey, D., & McCaslin, M. (2001). A comparative, sociocultural analysis of context and motivation. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts (pp. 33–55). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Järvelä, S., & Niemivirta, M. (1999). The changes in learning theory and the topicality of the recent research on motivation. Research Dialogue in Learning and Instruction, 1, 57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, E., & Latham, G. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Pons, M. (2000, June). Effective transfer as a self-regulatory process: Implications for adult education. Paper presented at the Royaumont Symposium on Self-Learning, Paris.

  • Martinez-Pons, M. (2001).The psychology of teaching and learning. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oettingen, G., Hænig, G., & Gollwitzer, P. (2000). Effective self-regulation of goal attainment. International Journal of Educational Research, 33, 705–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. (2000). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. (2003). Multiple goals and multiple pathways in the development of motivation and self-regulated learning. In L. Smith, C. Rogers, & P. Tomlinson (Eds.), Development and motivation (BJEP Monograph Series, 2(2), pp. 137–153). Leicester, UK: The British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P., & DeGroot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P., Wolters, C., & Baxter, G. (2000). Assessing metacognition and self-regulated learning. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 44–97). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resnick, L. (1989). (Ed.). Knowing, learning and instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, J. (2004). Methodological issues in questionnaire-based research on student learning in higher education. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 347–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schommer, M. (1993). Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 406–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuell, T. (1986). Cognitive conceptions of learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 411–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuell, T. (1996). Teaching and learning in a classroom context. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 726–764). London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobias, S., & Everson, H. (2000). Assessing metacognitive knowledge monitoring. In G. Schraw & J. Impara (Eds.), Issues in the measurement of metacognition (pp. 147–222). Lincoln, NE: Buros Institute of Mental Measurement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tynjälä, P. (1999). Towards expert knowledge? A comparison between a constructivist and a traditional learning environment in the university. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 357–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veenman, M., Kok, R., & Blötte, A. (2005). The relation between intellectual and metacognitive skills in early adolescence. Instructional Science, 33, 193–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J. (1995). Process-oriented instruction in learning and thinking skills. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10, 325–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermunt, J., & Verloop, N. (1999). Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction, 9, 257–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, C., Zimmerman, S., & Palmer, D. (1988). Assessing learning strategies: The design and development of the LASSI. In C. Weinstein (Ed.), Learning and study strategies: Issues in assessment, instruction and evaluation (pp. 25–40). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P. (1997). Experimenting to bootstrap self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 397–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P., Jamieson-Noel, D., & Muis, K. (2002). Methodological issues and advances in researching tactics, strategies and self-regulated learning. In P. Pintrich & M. Maer (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Vol. 12 New directions in measures and methods (pp. 121–155). Amsterdam: Elsevier Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Winne, P., & Perry, N. (2000). Measuring self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 531–566). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wosnitza, M., & Nenniger P. (2001). Perceived learning environments and the individual learning process. In S. Volet & S. Järvelä (Eds.), Motivation in learning contexts(pp. 171–187). London: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidner, M., Boekaerts, M., & Pintrich, P. (2000). Self-regulation: Directions and challenges for future research. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 749–768). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 3–21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (1998). Developing self-fulfilling cycles of academic regulation. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulated learning (pp. 1–19). London: The Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (1999). Commentary: Toward a cyclically interactive view of self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 545–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. (2001). Theories of self-regulated learning and academic achievement. In B. Zimmerman & D.Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 1–37). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., & Risemberg, R. (1997). Caveats and recommendations about self-regulation of writing: A social cognitive rejoinder. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22, 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B., & Schunk, D. (Eds.). (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maclellan, E., Soden, R. Facilitating Self-Regulation in Higher Education Through Self-Report. Learning Environ Res 9, 95–110 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-9002-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-005-9002-4

Keywords

Navigation