Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Implications of Subdividing Marital Status: Are Unmarried Mothers with Partners Different from Unmarried Mothers without Partners? An Exploratory Analysis

  • Published:
Maternal and Child Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective To determine the analytic advantages obtained from separating unmarried mothers with partners from unmarried mothers without partners when assessing risk of adverse birth outcomes. Methods Data were obtained from Listening to Mothers II, a national survey of women’s childbearing experiences. Marital status was asked with three choices: married (71%), unmarried with partner (24%), and unmarried without partner (5%). Demographic differences between the three marital status groups were compared using χ2 tests. Multiple logistic regressions, controlling for age, education, race/ethnicity, and parity, tested for associations between birth outcomes (birth weight and gestational age) and marital status. Results Unmarried mothers with partners and without partners were similar in age, education, and parity. Unmarried mothers without partners delivered by cesarean more often (39%) and were more likely to have a doctor as birth attendant (99%) than unmarried mothers with partners. The multiple logistic regressions indicated that, compared to married mothers, unmarried mothers with partners had the same risk of premature infants, while unmarried mothers without partners had greater risk. Unmarried first-time mothers with partners had over twice the risk of premature infants (OR = 2.71; 1.07–6.85) and unmarried mothers without partners had over 5 times the risk (OR = 5.64; 1.68–18.92) when compared to married first-time mothers. Conclusions Mothers without partners were at higher risk than unmarried mothers with partners indicating a gradient of risk. Future data collection on marital status should consider distinguishing between unmarried mothers with and without partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin, J., Hamilton, B., Sutton, P., Ventura, S., Menacker, F., Kirmeyer, S., et al. (2007). Births: Final data for 2005. National Vital Statistics Reports, Vol. 56, No. 6. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

  2. Ahmed, F. (1990). Unmarried mothers as a high-risk group for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Journal of Community Health, 15(1), 35–44. doi:10.1007/BF01350184.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kniazkov, M. (2006, October 15). For first time, unmarried households reign in U.S. USA Today.

  4. Luo, Z., Wilkins, R., & Kramer, M. (2004). Disparities in pregnancy outcomes according to marital and cohabitation status. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 103(6), 1300–1307.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Raatikainene, K., Heiskanen, N., & Heinonen, S. (2005). Marriage still protects pregnancy. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 112, 1411–1416. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00667.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bird, S., Chnadra, A., Bennett, T., & Harvey, S. (2000). Beyond marital status: Relationship type and duration and the risk of low birth weight. Family Planning Perspectives, 32(6), 281–287. doi:10.2307/2648196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gaudino, J. A., Jr, Jenkins, B., & Rochat, R. (1999). No fathers’ names: A risk factor for infant mortality in the State of Georgia, USA. Social Science and Medicine, 48, 253–265. doi:10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00342-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Adams, M. M., Elam-Evans, L. D., Wilson, H. G., & Gilbertz, D. A. (2000). Rates of and factors associated with recurrence of preterm delivery. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(12), 1591–1596. doi:10.1001/jama.283.12.1591.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bennett, T., Braveman, P., Egerter, S., & Kiely, J. L. (1994). Maternal marital status as a risk factor for infant mortality. Family Planning Perspectives, 26(6), 252–256, 271.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Declercq, E. R., Sakala, C., Corry, M. P., & Applebaum, S. (2006). Listening to mother II: Report of the second national US survey of women’s childbearing experiences. New York: Childbirth Connection 2006.

  11. Declercq, E. R., Cunningham, D., Johnson, C., & Sakala, C. (2008). Mothers’ reports of postpartum pain associated with vaginal and cesarean deliveries: Results of a national survey. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 35, 16–24. doi:10.1111/j.1523-536X.2007.00207.x.

    Google Scholar 

  12. SPSS.15.0 for Windows. SPSS Inc. 2006.

  13. National Center for Health Statistics. (2007). Vital Statistics 2005 Natality Public Use File. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA. Retrieved April 24, 2008 from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/VitalStats.htm.

  14. Kiernan, K. (1999). Childbearing outside marriage in western Europe. Population Trends, 98, 11–20.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bilszta, J., Tang, T., Meyer, D., Milgrom, J., Ericksen, J., & Buist, A. (2008). Single motherhood versus poor partner relationship: Outcomes for antenatal mental health. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42(1), 56–65. doi:10.1080/00048670701732731.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS). Phase 5 (2004–2008) standard questions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA. Retrieved March 10, 2008 from http://www.cdc.gov/prams/References/PRAMSPhase5MailStandard.doc.

  17. Methodology, P.R.A.M.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, GA. Retrieved March 10, 2008 from http://www.cdc.gov/prams/methodology.htm.

  18. Chalmers, B, Dzakpasu, S, Heaman, M, Kaczorowsk, J for the Maternity Experiences Study Group. (2008). The Canadian maternity experiences survey: An overview of findings. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 30(3), 217–228.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hamilton, B. E., Martin, J. A., & Ventura, S. J. (2007). Births: Preliminary data for 2006. National vital statistics reports, Vol. 56, No. 7. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Professor Declercq’s research is supported by a Robert Wood Johnson Investigator in Health Policy Award and by Childbirth Connections which funded the Listening to Mothers Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, 801 Massachusetts Ave CT-3, Boston, MA, 02118, USA

    Robin L. Young

  2. Department of Maternal & Child Health, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA

    Eugene Declercq

Authors
  1. Robin L. Young
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eugene Declercq
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robin L. Young.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Young, R.L., Declercq, E. Implications of Subdividing Marital Status: Are Unmarried Mothers with Partners Different from Unmarried Mothers without Partners? An Exploratory Analysis. Matern Child Health J 14, 209–214 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0450-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0450-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation