Skip to main content
Log in

Moral dilemmas in neonatology as experienced by health care practitioners: A qualitative approach

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last two decades there has been an enormous development in treatment possibilities in the field of neonatology, particularly for (extremely) premature infants. Although there are cross-cultural differences in treatment strategy, an overview of the literature suggests that every country is confronted with moral dilemmas in this area. These concern decisions to initiate or withhold treatment directly at birth and, later on, decisions to withdraw treatment with the possible consequence that the child will die. Given that the neonate cannot express his or her own will, who will decide? And on the basis of what information, values and norms? We explored some of these issues in daily practice by interviewing a small sample of health care practitioners in a Dutch university Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). It turned out that experiencing moral dilemmas is part of their daily functioning. Nurses underline the suffering of the newborn, whereas physicians stress uncertainty in treatment outcome. To make the best of it, nurses focus on their caring task, whereas physicians hope that future follow-up research will lead to more predictable outcomes. As for their own offspring, part of these professionals would hesitate to bring their own extremely premature newborn to a NICU. For the most oppressing dilemma reported – terminating an already initiated treatment – we propose the concept of ‘evidence shift’ to clarify the ambiguous position of uncertainty in decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beauchamp T.L. and Childress J.F. (2001). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuttini M., Nadai M., Kaminski M. and Hansen G. and R. de Leeuw et al.: (2000). End-of-life Decisions in Neonatal Intensive Care: Physicians Self-reported Practices in Seven European Countries. The Lancet 355(9221): 2112–2118 DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02378-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duff R.S. and Campbell A.G.M. (1973). Moral and Ethical Dilemmas in the Special Care Nursery. New England Journal of Medicine 289: 890–894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garel M., Seguret S., Kaminsky M. and Cuttini M. (2004). Ethical Decision-Making for Extremely Preterm Deliveries: Results of a Qualitative Survey Among Obstetricians and Midwives. Journal of Maternal Fetal Neonatal Medicine 15(6): 394–399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B.G. and Strauss A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Aldine, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaser B.G. (1992). Basics of Grounded Theory Analyses. Sociology Press, Mill Valley, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Heide, A., P.J. van der Maas, G. van der Wal, L.C.M. de Graaf, Kester J.G.C. and Kollée L.A.A. (1997). Medical End-of-Life Decisions Made for Neonates and Infants in The Netherlands. The Lancet 350(9073): 251–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussain N. and Rosenkrantz T.S. (2003). Ethical Considerations in the Management of Infants Born at Extremely Low Gestational Age. Seminars in Perinatology 27(6): 458–470

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kollée L.A.A, A. van der Heide, R. de Leeuw, P.J. van der Maas and G. van der Wal: (1999). End-of-life Decisions in Neonates. Seminars in Perinatology 23: 234–241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz J.M., Paneth N., Jetton J.R., den Ouden L. and Tyson J.E. (2001). Comparison of Management Strategies For Extreme Prematurity in New Jersey and The Netherlands: Outcomes and Resource Expenditure. Pediatrics 108: 1269–1274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz J.M. (2004). Compassion and Perplexity. Commentary. Pediatrics 111(2): 403–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mesman J. (2002). Ervaren Pioniers; Omgaan met twijfel in de Intensive care voor Pasgeborenen. Aksant, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Orfali K. and Gordon E.J. (2004). Autonomy Gone Awry: A Cross-Cultural Study of Parents’ Experiences in Neonatal Intensive Care Units. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 235(4): 329–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Provoost V., Deliens L., Cools F., Deconinck P.G., Ramet J., Mortier F. and Vandenplas Y. (2004). A Classification of End-of-Life Decisions in Neonates and Infants. Acta Paediatrics 93(3): 301–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rebagliato M., Cuttini M., Broggin L. and Berbik I. and de Vonderweid et al.: (2000). Neonatal End-of-Life Decision Making: Physicians’ Attitudes and Relationship with Self-reported Practices in 10 European Countries. Journal of the Amarican Medical Association 15, 284(19): 2451–2459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Theil S. (2004). Does Empirical Research Make Bioethics More Relevant? “The Embedded Researcher’ as a Methodological Approach. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy 7(1): 17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter-Theil S., Hentschel R. and Lindner K. (2005). Lebenserhaltung und Sterbebegleitung in der Neonatologie. Eine empirische Ethik-Studie zu kritischen Therapieentscheidungen. Zeitschrift für Palliativmedizin 6: 11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoden N.K. (1986). Treating Baby Doe: The Ethics of Uncertainty. Hastings Center Report 16: 34–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silverman W.A. (1992). Overtreatment of Neonates? A Personal Retrospective. Pediatrics 90: 9761–9763

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman W.A. (2004). Compassion or Opportunism? Commentary. Pediatrics 113(2): 402–403

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh J., Lantos J. and Meadow W. (2004). End-of-Life After Birth: Death and Dying in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. Pediatrics 114(6): 1620–1626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Syvertsen L. and Bratlid D. (2004). Withdrawal of Treatment in Severely Ill Newborn Infants. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 124(19): 2483–2485

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verhagen E. and Sauer P.J.J. (2005). The Groningen Protocol’ Euthanasia in Severely Ill Newborns. New England Journal of Medicine 352(10): 959–962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Aa Zeben-van, T.M., Verloove-Vanhorick S.P., Brand R. and Ruys J.H. (1989). Morbidity of Very Low Birth Weight Infants at Corrected Age of Two Years in a Geographically Defined Population. Lancet 1: 253–255

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Florence J. van Zuuren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Zuuren, F.J., van Manen, E. Moral dilemmas in neonatology as experienced by health care practitioners: A qualitative approach. Med Health Care Philos 9, 339–347 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-5641-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-005-5641-6

Keywords

Navigation