Abstract
The key challenge to understand the nanomechanical behavior of nanoparticle chain aggregates (NCA) is strongly dependent on accurate determination of the contact area between individual particles. Experimental determination of the contacting radius is extremely difficult and often not reliable. We present calculations based on elastic contact mechanics models, that predict the contact radii of nanoparticles. The model considers important parameters, such as the particle size, the elastic property of the materials and the effect of humidity that intervenes between the contacts. Calculations carried out for four selected materials show that there is a large difference between the radii of contacts formed in vacuum and in ambient conditions. In vacuum, the surface energy of the material is higher compared to that in ambient condition and the contact formation is dominated by the strong interactions between the surfaces. In ambient condition, the contact is dominated by the Laplace pressure due to the condensed water meniscus between the contacts. Calculations presented in this article show that the contact radius between nanoparticles depends on materials properties and the environment.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aronov D, Rosenman G (2007) Wettability study of modified silicon dioxide surface using environmental scanning electron microscopy. J Appl Phys 101:84901. doi:10.1063/1.2721945
Assay DB, Kim SH (2006) Effects of adsorbed water layer structure on adhesion force of silicon oxide nanoasperity contact in humid air. J Chem Phys 124:1747121–1747125
Bamber MJ, Cooke KE, Mann AB, Derby B (2001) Accurate determination of Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of thin films by a combination of acoustic microscopy and nanoindentation. Thin Solid Films 398–399:299–305. doi:10.1016/S0040-6090(01)01341-4
Burris DL, Sawyer WG (2006) Improved wear resistance in alumina-PTFE nanocomposites with irregular shaped nanoparticles. Wear 260:915–918. doi:10.1016/j.wear.2005.06.009
Derjaguin BV, Müller VM, Toporov YP (1975) Effect of contact deformations on the adhesion of particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 53:314–326. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(75)90018-1
DeVries GA, Brunnbauer M, Hu Y, Jackson AM, Long B, Neltner BT, et al. (2007) Science 315(5810):358–361. doi:10.1126/science.1133162
Grobelny J, Tsai D-H, Kim D-I, Pradeep N, Cook RF, Zachariah MR (2006a) Mechanism of nanoparticle manipulation by scanning tunnelling microscopy. Nanotechnology 17:5519–5524. doi:10.1088/0957-4484/17/21/037
Grobelny J, Pradeep N, Kim D-I, Ying ZC (2006b) Quantification of the meniscus effect in adhesion force measurements. Appl Phys Lett 88:91906. doi:10.1063/1.2181200
Hamdy AS (2006) Advanced nano-particles anti-corrosion ceria based sol gel coatings for aluminum alloys. Mater Lett 60:2633–2637. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2006.01.049
Harnett EM, Alderman J, Wood T (2007) The surface energy of various biomaterials coated with adhesion molecules used in cell culture. Colloids Surf B 55:90–97. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.11.021
He M, Blum AS, Aston DE, Buenviaje C, Overney RM (2001) Critical phenomena of water bridges in nanoasperity contacts. J Chem Phys 114:1355–1360. doi:10.1063/1.1331298
Israelachvili JN (1991) Intermolecular and surface forces. Academic Press, London
Johnson KL, Kendall K, Robert AD (1971) Surface energy and contact of elastic solids. Proc R Soc Lond A 324:301
Kelly BT (1981) Physics of graphite. Applied Science Publishers, London
Kuhn H, Medlin D (2000) ASM Handbook, Mechanical testing and evaluation, vol 8. ASM International, OH
Landman U, Luedtke WD, Gao J (1996) Atomic-scale issues in tribology: interfacial junctions and nano-elastohydrodynamics. Langmuir 12:4514. doi:10.1021/la950890+
Lantz MA, O’Shea SJ, Welland ME (1997) Simultaneous force and conduction measurements in atomic force microscopy. Phys Rev B 56:15345–15352. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.56.15345
Mark JE (ed) (1999) Polymer data handbook. Oxford University Press, New York
Maugis D (1992) Adhesion of spheres: The JKR–DMT transition using a Dugdale model. J Colloid Interface Sci 150:243. doi:10.1016/0021-9797(92)90285-T
Maugis D, Gauthier-Manuel B (1994) JKR-DMT transition in the presence of a liquid meniscus. J Adhes Sci Technol 8:1311–1322. doi:10.1163/156856194X00627
Medalia AI, Kraus C (1994) Reinforcement of elastomers by paniculate fillers. In: Mark JE, Erman B, Eirich FR (eds) Science and technology of rubber. Academic Press, New York
Medasani B, Park YH, Vasiliev I (2007) Theoretical study of the surface energy, stress, and lattice contraction of silver nanoparticles. Phys Rev B 75:2354361–2354366. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.75.235436
Miller RE, Phillips R (1996) Critical analysis of local constitutive models for slip and decohesion. Philos Mag A 73(4):803–827. doi:10.1080/01418619608243690
Morcos I (1972) Surface tension of stress-annealed pyrolytic graphite. J Chem Phys 57:1801–1802. doi:10.1063/1.1678482
Nanda KK, Maisels A, Kruis FE, Fissan H, Stappert S (2003) Higher surface energy of free nanoparticles. Phys Rev Lett 91:106102. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.106102
Pavlina EJ, Meier AM, Monteleone P, Weigner JD (2007) Development of silver–metal oxide reactive air braze alloys for electroding PZT ceramics. J Mater Sci 42:705–713. doi:10.1007/s10853-006-1381-0
Rong W, Pelling AE, Ryan A, Gimzewski JK, Friedlander SK (2004) Complementary TEM and AFM force spectroscopy to characterize the nanomechanical properties of nanoparticle chain aggregates. Nano Lett 4:2287–2292. doi:10.1021/nl0487368
Rong W, Ding W, Madler L, Ruoff RS, Friedlander SK (2006) Mechanical properties of NCAby combined AFM and SEM: isolated aggregates and networks. Nano Lett 6:2646–2655. doi:10.1021/nl061146k
Schmid G (ed) (2004) Nanoparticles: from theory to application. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim
Stellacci F (2005) Nanoscale materials—a new season. Nat Mater 4:113–114. doi:10.1038/nmat1316
Suh YJ, Friedlander SK (2003) Origins of elastic behavior of nanoparticle chain aggregates: measurements using nanostructure manipulation device. J Appl Phys 93:3515–352. doi:10.1063/1.1542924
Vakarelski IU, Higashitani K (2006) Single-nanoparticle-terminated tips for Scanning Probe Microscopy. Langmuir 22:2931–2934. doi:10.1021/la0528145
Warner MG, Hutchison JE (2003) Formation of linear and branched nanoassemblies of gold nanoparticles by electrostatic assembly in solution on DNA scaffolds. Nat Mater 2:272–276. doi:10.1038/nmat853
Zhiyong T, Krotov NA (2005) One-dimensional assemblies of nanoparticles: preparation, properties, and promise. Adv Mater 17(8):951–962. doi:10.1002/adma.200401593
Acknowledgments
One of the authors (J. Grobelny) was partially supported by a grant from Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway through the EEA Financial Mechanism and Foundation for Polish Science - Homing Program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Grobelny, J., Pradeep, N. & Kim, DI. Estimation of contact area of nanoparticles in chains using continuum elastic contact mechanics. J Nanopart Res 10 (Suppl 1), 163–169 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9434-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-008-9434-8