Skip to main content
Log in

A Controlled Trial of Web-Based Feedback for Heavy Drinking College Students

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Prevention Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

AbstractObjective: Alcohol consumption has been a growing concern at U.S. colleges, particularly among first-year students, who are at increased risk for problems. This study tested the efficacy of the “electronic Check-Up to Go” (e-CHUG), a commercially-available internet program, at reducing drinking among a group of at-risk college freshman. Method: The design was a randomized controlled trial: 106 freshmen students who reported heavy episodic drinking were randomly assigned to receive feedback or to assessment only. Assessment measures were completed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks. Results: At 8 weeks, the feedback group showed a significant decrease in drinks per week and peak BAC over control. By 16 weeks, the control group also declined to a point where there were no differences between groups. Changes in normative drinking estimates mediated the effect of the intervention. An additional 245 abstainers and light drinkers who were also randomized to condition did not show any intervention effect. Conclusions: This study provides preliminary support for the efficacy of this intervention at reducing short-term drinking among at-risk students.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostinelli, G., Brown, J. M., & Miller, W. R. (1995). Effects of normative feedback on consumption among heavy drinking college students. Journal of Drug Education, 25(1), 31–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. S., Marlatt, G. A., Kivlahan, D. R., Fromme, K., Larimer, M. E., & Williams, E. (1992). An experimental test of three methods of alcohol risk reduction with young adults. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60(6), 974–979.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Borsari, B., & Carey, K. B. (2000). Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 728–733.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. L., Parks, G. A., & Marlatt, G. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53(2), 189–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, S. E., Carey, K. B., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2002). Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(5), 559–567.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Del Boca, F. K., Darkes, J., Greenbaum, P. E., & Goldman, M. S. (2004). Up close and personal: Temporal variability in the drinking of individual college students during their first year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(2), 155–164.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, P. N. (1996). Unintended consequences of crime prevention. In R. Homel (Ed.), Politics and practice of situational crime prevention. Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 5.Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hingson, R. W., Heeren, T., Zakocs, R. C., Kopstein, A., & Wechsler, H. (2002). Magnitude of alcohol-related mortality and morbidity among U.S. college students ages 18--24. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(2), 136–144.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L. D., O’Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2000). National survey results on drug use from the monitoring the future study, 1975–1999. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larimer, M. E., Turner, A. P., Anderson, B. K., Fader, J. S., Kilmer, J. R., & Palmer, R. S. (2001). Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(3), 370–380.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. A., & Neighbors, C. (2006). Social norms approaches using descriptive drinking norms education: A review of the research on personalized normative feedback. Journal of American College Health, 54(4), 213–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marlatt, G. A., Baer, J. S., Kivlahan, D. R., Dimeff, L. A., Larimer, M. E., & Quigley, L. A. (1998). Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 604–615.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, E. T., Neal, D. J., Roberts, L. J., Baer, J. S., Cressler, S. O., & Metrik, J. (2002). Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: Is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods? Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 16(1), 56–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed.).New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neal, D. J., & Carey, K. B. (2004). Developing discrepancy within self-regulation theory: Use of personalized normative feedback and personal strivings with heavy-drinking college students. Addictive Behaviors, 29(2), 281–297.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Neighbors, C., Larimer, M. E., & Lewis, M. A. (2004). Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: Efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 434–447.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, P. M., & Johnston, L. D. (2002). Epidemiology of alcohol and other drug use among American college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. Supplement, 14, 23–39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins, H. W., Haines, M. P., & Rice, R. (2005). Misperceiving the college drinking norm and related problems: A nationwide study of exposure to prevention information, perceived norms and student alcohol misuse. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 66(4), 470–478.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, D. B. (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schafer, J. L. (1997). Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuckit, M. A., Klein, J. L., Twitchell, G. R., & Springer, L. M. (1994). Increases in alcohol-related problems for men on a college campus between 1980 and 1992. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55(6), 739–742.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turrisi, R., Wiersma, K. A., & Hughes, K. K. (2000). Binge-drinking-related consequences in college students: Role of drinking beliefs and mother-teen communications. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 14(4), 342–355.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. T. (2000). In praise of feedback: An effective intervention for college students who are heavy drinkers. Journal of American College Health, 48(5), 235–238.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. T., Bennett, M. E., & Miller, J. H. (2000). Reducing alcohol use in college students: A controlled trial of two brief interventions. Journal of Drug Education, 30(3), 361–372.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. T., & Neighbors, C. (2005). Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: What, why and for whom? Addictive Behaviors, 30(6), 1168–1182.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walters, S. T., & Woodall, W. G. (2003). Mailed feedback reduces consumption among moderate drinkers who are employed. Prevention Science, 4(4), 287–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, H., Lee, J. E., Kuo, M., Seibring, M., Nelson, T. F., & Lee, H. (2002). Trends in college binge drinking during a period of increased prevention efforts: Findings from four Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study surveys:1993–2001. Journal of American College Health, 50(5), 203–217.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. R., & Labouvie, E. W. (1989). Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50(1), 30–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. D., Aitken, S. S., & Malin, H. (1985). Reliability of self-reported alcohol consumption in a general population survey. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 46(3), 223–227.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wolber, G., Carne, W. F., & Alexander, R. (1990). The validity of self-reported abstinence and quality sobriety following chemical dependency treatment. The International Journal of the Addictions, 25(5), 495–513.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported by a PRIME grant from the University of Texas School of Public Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott T. Walters.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walters, S.T., Vader, A.M. & Harris, T.R. A Controlled Trial of Web-Based Feedback for Heavy Drinking College Students. Prev Sci 8, 83–88 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0059-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11121-006-0059-9

Keywords

Navigation