Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF Measure the Same Constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan Population*

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background: The SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF are available for international use, but it is not clear if they measure the same constructs. We compared the psychometric properties and factor structures of these two instruments. Methods: Data were collected from a national representative sample (n=11,440) in the 2001 Taiwan National Health Interview Survey, which included Taiwan versions of the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF. We used Cronbach’s alpha coefficient to estimate scale reliability. We conducted exploratory factor analysis to determine factor structure of the scales, and applied multitrait analysis to evaluate convergent and discriminant validity. We used standardized effect size to compare known-groups validity for health-related variables (including chronic conditions and health care utilization) and self-reported overall quality of life. Structural equation modeling was used to analyze relationships among the two SF-36 component scales (PCS and MCS) and the four WHOQOL subscales (physical, psychological, social relations, and environmental). Results: Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were acceptable (⩾0.7) for all subscales of both instruments. The factor analysis yielded two unique factors: one for the 8 SF-36 subscales and a second for the 4 WHOQOL subscales. Pearson correlations were weak (<0.3) among subscales of both instruments. Correlations for subscales hypothesized to measure similar constructs differed little from those measuring heterogeneous subscales. Effect sizes suggested greater discrimination by the SF-36 for health status and services utilization known groups, but greater discrimination by the WHOQOL for QOL-defined groups. Structural equation modeling suggested that the SF-36 PCS and MCS were weakly associated with WHOQOL. Conclusions: In this Taiwan population sample, the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF appear to measure different constructs: the SF-36 measures health-related QOL, while the WHOQOL-BREF measures global QOL. Clinicians and researchers should carefully define their research questions related to patient-reported outcomes before selecting which instrument to use.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. AL Stewart S Greenfield RD Hays et al. (1989) ArticleTitleFunctional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study JAMA 262 907–913 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.262.7.907 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BiaA38bht1M%3D Occurrence Handle2754790

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. NK Aaronson BE Meyerowitz M Bard et al. (1991) ArticleTitleQuality of life research in oncology. Past achievements and future priorities Cancer 67 839–843 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By6D1MfmtVQ%3D Occurrence Handle1986855

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. DL Patrick YP Chiang (2000) ArticleTitleMeasurement of health outcomes in treatment effectiveness evaluations: Conceptual and methodological challenges Med Care 38 II14–II25 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvntlOkug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10982087

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. MJ Naughton SA Shumaker (2003) ArticleTitleThe case for domains of function in quality of life assessment Qual Life Res 12 IssueIDSuppl 1 73–80 Occurrence Handle12803313

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. TM Gill AR Feinstein (1994) ArticleTitleA critical appraisal of the quality of quality-of-life measurements JAMA 272 619–626 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.272.8.619 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuA3srhs1E%3D Occurrence Handle7726894

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. JEJ Ware (1997) Sf-36 Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A User’s Manual Quality Metric Boston

    Google Scholar 

  7. QualityMetric Incoporated (http://www.qualitymetric.com/products/descriptions/sflicenses.shtml). Access: 1-2-2005

  8. InstitutionalAuthorNameThe WHOQOL Group (1995) ArticleTitleThe World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): Position paper from the World Health Organization Soc Sci Med 41 1403–1409

    Google Scholar 

  9. InstitutionalAuthorNameThe WHOQOL Group (1998) ArticleTitleDevelopment of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. The WHOQOL Group Psychol Med 28 551–558

    Google Scholar 

  10. The WHO Field Centre for the Study of Quality of Life (http://www.bath.ac.uk/whoqol/questionnaires/ethics-statement.cfm). Access: 1-2-2005

  11. AE Bonomi DL Patrick DM Bushnell M Martin (2000) ArticleTitleValidation of the United States’ version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL) instrument J Clin Epidemiol 53 1–12 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7lsFGltg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10693897

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. V Norholm P Bech (2001) ArticleTitleThe WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Questionnaire: Danish validation study Nord J Psychiatry 55 229–235 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387gs1Ckug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11839112

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. SM Skevington MS Carse AC Williams (2001) ArticleTitleValidation of the WHOQOL-100: Pain management improves quality of life for chronic pain patients Clin J Pain 17 264–275 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00002508-200109000-00013 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrktVCmsg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11587119

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. M Amir N Lewin-Epstein G Becker D Buskila (2002) ArticleTitlePsychometric properties of the SF-12 (Hebrew version) in a primary care population in Israel Med Care 40 918–928 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00005650-200210000-00009 Occurrence Handle12395025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. PC Hsiung CT Fang YY Chang MY Chen JD Wang (2005) ArticleTitleComparison of WHOQOL-BREF and SF-36 in patients with HIV infection Qual Life Res 14 141–150 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s11136-004-6252-z Occurrence Handle15789948

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. B Spilker DA Revicki (1996) Taxonomy of quality of life B Spilker (Eds) Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials Lippincott-Raven Publishers Philadelphia 25–31

    Google Scholar 

  17. YT Shih YT Hung HY Chang et al. (2003) ArticleTitleThe design, contents, operation and the characteristics of the respondents of the 2001 National Health Interview Survey in Taiwan Taiwan J Public Health 22 419–430

    Google Scholar 

  18. JL Fuh SJ Wang SR Lu KD Juang SJ Lee (2000) ArticleTitlePsychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 health survey amongst middle-aged women from a rural community Qual Life Res 9 675–683 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1008993821633 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M3jtl2rtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11236857

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. JF Lu HM Tseng YJ Tsai (2003) ArticleTitleAssessment of health-related quality of life in Taiwan (I): Development and psychometric testing of SF-36 Taiwan version Taiwan J Public Health 22 501–511

    Google Scholar 

  20. CT Fang PC Hsiung CF Yu MY Chen JD Wang (2002) ArticleTitleValidation of the World Health Organization quality of life instrument in patients with HIV infection Qual Life Res 11 753–762 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1020870402019 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38jhvFOqtQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12482159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. G Yao CW Chung CF Yu JD Wang (2002) ArticleTitleDevelopment and verification of validity and reliability of the WHOQOL-BREF Taiwan version J Formos Med Assoc 101 342–351 Occurrence Handle12101852

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. KR Popper (2002) Science: Conjectures and refutations KR Poper (Eds) Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge Routledge New York 33–58

    Google Scholar 

  23. PM Fayers D Machin (2000) Scores and measurements: Validity, reliability, sensitivity PM Fayers D Machin (Eds) Quality of Life: Assessment, Analysis and Interpretation John Wiley & Sons West Sussex, UK 45–71

    Google Scholar 

  24. S Sharma (1996) Confirmatory Factor Analysis S Sharma (Eds) Applied Multivariate Techniques John Wiley & Sons West Sussex, UK 90–143

    Google Scholar 

  25. GL Albrecht PJ Devlieger (1999) ArticleTitleThe disability paradox: High quality of life against all odds Soc Sci Med 48 977–988 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00411-0 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mzhs12htA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10390038

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. LB Meuleners AH Lee CW Binns A Lower (2003) ArticleTitleQuality of life for adolescents: Assessing measurement properties using structural equation modelling Qual Life Res 12 283–290 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1023221913292 Occurrence Handle12769141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. InstitutionalAuthorNameThe WHOQOL Group (1998) ArticleTitleThe World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment (WHOQOL): Development and general psychometric properties Soc Sci Med 46 1569–1585 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00009-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. E Diener EM Suh RE Lucas HL Smith (1999) ArticleTitleSubjective well-being: Three decades of progress Psychol Bull 125 276–302 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. JE Ware SuffixJr (1987) ArticleTitleStandards for validating health measures: Definition and content J Chronic Dis 40 473–480 Occurrence Handle3298292

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. M Bullinger R Anderson D Cella N Aaronson (1993) ArticleTitleDeveloping and evaluating cross-cultural instruments from minimum requirements to optimal models Qual Life Res 2 451–459 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00422219 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB3MvjvFY%3D Occurrence Handle8161979

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. R Veenhoven (2000) ArticleTitleThe four quality of life. Ordering concepts and measures of the good life J Happiness Stud 1 IssueID1 1–39

    Google Scholar 

  32. N Abramson (1996) ArticleTitleQuality of life: Who can make the judgment? Am J Med 100 365–366 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9343(97)89497-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:BymB3c3osFI%3D Occurrence Handle8629684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. A Spiro SuffixIII R Bosse (2000) ArticleTitleRelations between health-related quality of life and well-being: The gerontologist’s new clothes? Int J Aging Hum Dev 50 297–318 Occurrence Handle11087109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. R Arnold AV Ranchor R Sanderman GI Kempen J Ormel TP Suurmeijer (2004) ArticleTitleThe relative contribution of domains of quality of life to overall quality of life for different chronic diseases Qual Life Res 13 883–896 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:QURE.0000025599.74923.f2 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2czjtFWqtA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15233502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. SM Skevington M Lotfy KA O’Connell (2004) ArticleTitleThe World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: Psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group Qual Life Res 13 299–310 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD2c7ovF2itQ%3D%3D Occurrence Handle15085902

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. JP Browne CA O’Boyle HM McGee et al. (1994) ArticleTitleIndividual quality of life in the healthy elderly Qual Life Res 3 235–244 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00434897 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC3M7ktl0%3D Occurrence Handle7812276

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. R Berzon RD Hays SA Shumaker (1993) ArticleTitleInternational use, application and performance of health-related quality of life instruments Qual Life Res 2 367–368 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00422214 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByuB3MvjvVM%3D Occurrence Handle8161974

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. GH Guyatt DH Feeny DL Patrick (1993) ArticleTitleMeasuring health-related quality of life Ann Intern Med 118 622–629 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1Mbht1E%3D Occurrence Handle8452328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. A Montazeri CR Gillis J McEwen (1996) ArticleTitleMeasuring quality of life in oncology: Is it worthwhile? I. Meaning, purposes and controversies Eur J Cancer Care (Engl.) 5 159–167 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiB2M%2Fgt1U%3D

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. SM Hunt (1997) ArticleTitleThe problem of quality of life Qual Life Res 6 205–212 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA2s%2FmvFU%3D Occurrence Handle9226977

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. A Leplege S Hunt (1997) ArticleTitleThe problem of quality of life in medicine JAMA 278 47–50 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.278.1.47 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByiA2M%2Fps1Y%3D Occurrence Handle9207338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. CA McHorney JE Ware SuffixJr AE Raczek (1993) ArticleTitleThe MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs Med Care 31 247–263 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByyC1MnisVI%3D Occurrence Handle8450681

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    I-Chan Huang & Albert W. Wu

  2. Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Albert W. Wu

  3. Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Albert W. Wu

  4. Department of Biostatistics, Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA

    Constantine Frangakis

Authors
  1. I-Chan Huang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Albert W. Wu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Constantine Frangakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Albert W. Wu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, IC., Wu, A.W. & Frangakis, C. Do the SF-36 and WHOQOL-BREF Measure the Same Constructs? Evidence from the Taiwan Population*. Qual Life Res 15, 15–24 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-005-8486-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation