Skip to main content
Log in

Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: Prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Study objective:

To investigate whether the structure of Antonovsky’s [Unraveling the Mystery of Health. How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1987] 13-item Sense of Coherence (SOC) scale remains invariant across time and across age groups and whether any differences in stability of and mean changes in SOC can be seen between young people and individuals aged 30 or above.

Design:

Prospective study with a population-based sample of 18,525 Finns of whom 4,682 were under age 30 and 13,843 over age 30 at both the baseline and 5-year follow-up surveys (the HeSSup study).

Results:

Confirmatory factor analysis supported the correlated 3-factor solution for the SOC scale and its equivalent second-order factor structure at both measurement times and in both age groups. According to Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), SOC was more stable among subjects over 30 years (stability coefficient 0.81) than among younger adults (0.70). The mean level of SOC was higher among subjects over age 30 than subjects under age 30 at both times. The level of SOC increased during the follow-up period in both age groups but to a greater extent among the younger than older age group.

Conclusions:

These data suggest relatively high structural validity and high stability for the 13-item SOC measure and support the notion that SOC becomes more stable following maturation. The 13-item SOC measure seems to provide a psychometrically sound survey instrument for testing Antonovsky’s theory on life orientation and health.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antonovsky A (1987) Unraveling the Mystery of Health. How People Manage Stress and Stay Well. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  2. Matthews KA (1988) Coronary heart disease and type A behaviors: Update on and alternative to the Booth-Kewley and Friedman (1987) quantitative review. Psychol Bull 104:373–80

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Miller TQ, Smith TW, Turner CW, Guijarro ML, Hallet AJ (1996) A meta-analytic review of research on hostility and physical health. Psychol Bull 119:322–48

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Thoresen CE, Powell LH (1992) Type A behavior pattern: New perspectives on theory, assessment, and intervention. J Consult Clin Psychol 60:595–04

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Antonovsky A (1993) The structure, properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med 36:725–33

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Flannery RB, Flannery GJ (1990) Sense of coherence, life stress, and psychological distress: A prospective methodological inquiry. J Clin Psychol 46:415–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Frenz AW, Carey MP, Jorgensen RS (1993) Psychometric evaluation of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale. Psychol Assess 5:145–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Callahan LF, Pincus T (1995) The sense of coherence scale in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res 8:28–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gana K, Garnier S (2001) Latent structure of the sense of coherence scale in a French sample. Pers Indiv Differ 31:1079–090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Feldt T, Rasku A (1998) The structure of Antonovsky’s orientation to life questionnaire. Pers Indiv Differ 25:505–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Feldt T, Kivimäki M, Rantala A, et al. (2004) Sense of coherence and work characteristics: A cross-lagged structural equation model among managers. J Occup Organ Psychol 77:323–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Feldt T, Leskinen E, Kinnunen U (2005) Structural invariance and stability of sense of coherence: A longitudinal analysis of two age groups with different employment experiences. Work Stress 19:68–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feldt T, Leskinen E, Kinnunen U, et al. (2000) Longitudinal factor analysis models in the assessment of the stability of sense of coherence. Pers Indiv Differ 28:239–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feldt T, Leskinen E, Kinnunen U, et al. (2003) The stability of sense of coherence: Comparing two age groups in a 5-year follow-up study. Pers Indiv Differ 35:1151–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Veenstra M, Moum T, Røysamb E (2005) Relationships between health domains and sense of coherence: A two-year cross-lagged study in patients with chronic illness. Qual Life Res 14:1455–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Caspi A, Roberts BW (1999) Personality continuity and change across the life course. In Pervin LA, John OP Eds Handbook of Personality Psychology: Theory and Research. 2 New York: Guilford Press 300–26

    Google Scholar 

  17. Trzesniewski KH, Donnellan MB, Robins RW (2003) Stability and self-esteem across the life span. J Pers Soc Psychol 84:205–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schnyder U, Buchi S, Sensky T, et al. (2000) Antonovsky’s sense of coherence: Trait or state? Psychother Psychosom 69:296–02

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kivimäki M, Feldt T, Vahtera J, et al. (2000) Sense of coherence and health: Evidence from two cross-lagged longitudinal samples. Soc Sci Med 50:583–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Eriksson M, Lindström B (2005) Validity of Antonovsky’s sense of coherence scale: A systematic review. Epidemiol Community Health 59:460–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Korkeila K, Suominen S, Ahvenainen J, et al. (2001) Non-response and related factors in a nation-wide health survey. Eur J Epidemiol 17:991–99

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jöreskog K, Sörbom D, du Toit S, et al. (1999) LISREL 8: New Statistical Features. Chicago, IL, Scientific Software International

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jöreskog K, Sörbom D (1996) PRELIS 2: User’s Reference Guide. Chicago, IL, Scientific Software International

    Google Scholar 

  24. Browne MW, Cudeck R (1993) Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen KA, Long JS. Eds. Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park, CA, Sage 136–62

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1994) LISREL VI User’s Guide (3 rd ed). Chicago, IL, Scientific Software International

    Google Scholar 

  26. Akaike H (1987) Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika 52:317–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu L, Bentler PM (1999) Cut-off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 6:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

TF was supported by the Academy of Finland (project 44858) and Finnish Work Environment Fund (project 105363). MiK and JV were supported by the Academy of Finland (projects 104891 and 105195) and the Finnish Work Environment Fund. MaK (the director of the HeSSup study) was supported by the Academy of Finland (project 201363). The HeSSup Study Group consists of the following researchers (in alphabetical order): Elovainio Marko, Franck Jaana, Helenius Hans, Immonen-Räihä Pirjo, Jalava-Broman Jaana, Jokinen Kirsi, Kivimäki Mika, Korkeila Jyrki, Korkeila Katariina, Koskenvuo Markku, Lillberg Kirsi, Mattila Kari, Ojanlatva Ansa, Paljärvi Tapio, Rautava Päivi, Sillanmäki Lauri, Sumanen Markku, Suominen Sakari, Vahtera Jussi, Vainionmäki Paula, Virtanen Pekka and Volanen Salla-Maarit.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taru Feldt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Feldt, T., Lintula, H., Suominen, S. et al. Structural validity and temporal stability of the 13-item sense of coherence scale: Prospective evidence from the population-based HeSSup study. Qual Life Res 16, 483–493 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9130-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-006-9130-z

Keywords

Navigation