Skip to main content
Log in

Age trajectories of quality of life among older adults: results from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing

  • Published:
Quality of Life Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To explore age-trajectories of quality of life (QoL) and influences on them in a 4-year period among older adults living in England.

Methods

Data come from three waves (2002–2003 and 2006–2007) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, a large panel study of 11,392 individuals aged 50 and over. We used Latent Growth Curve models and ageing-vector graphs to describe both individual differences and average population age-trajectories in QoL (measured by the CASP19 questionnaire).

Results

QoL at baseline was poorer for older than younger respondents, with the differences widening with age. QoL also declined more rapidly for older individuals. Gender, education, depression, limiting long-standing illness, difficulty with ADL-s, lack of wealth, non-employment, decreased number of friends and low positive support had a negative impact on QoL. Living with a partner had a positive effect on the QoL of men but not of women. The ageing-vector graphs revealed a clear gradient in age-trajectories of QoL for those in the best to the worst psychosocial, socioeconomic and health conditions.

Conclusions

Younger old adults can be prepared for further ageing by increasing their network of friends and engaging with the wider community while they are able.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bowling, A. (2004). A taxonomy and overview of quality of life. In J. Brown, A. Bowling, & T. Flynn (Eds.), Models of quality of life. FORUM project, European forum on population ageing research, department of sociological studies (pp. 6–77). University of Sheffield: Sheffield.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Haywood, K. L., Garratt, A. M., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2005). Quality of life in older people: A structured review of generic-self assessed health instruments. Quality of Life Research, 14, 1651–1668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Turner-Bowker, D. M., Bartley, P. J., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (2002). SF-36 ® health survey & “sf” bibliography: Third edition (1988–2000). Lincoln, RI: Quality Metric Incorporated.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Power, M., Quinn, K., Schmidt, S., & WHOQOL Group. (2005). Development of the WHOQOL-old module. Quality of Life Research, 14, 2197–2214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Erikson, R. (1993). Description of inequality: the Swedish approach to welfare research. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 67–83). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. B. (2003). A measure of quality of life in early old age: The theory, development and properties of a needs satisfaction model (CASP-19). Aging & mental health, 7, 186–194.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Doyal, L., & Gough, I. (1991). A theory of human need. Basingstoke, Hamphshire: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wiggins, R. D., Netuveli, G., Hyde, M., Higgs, P., & Blane, D. B. (2008). The evaluation of a self-enumerated scale of quality of life (CASP-19) in the context of research on ageing: A combination of exploratory and confirmatory approaches. Social Indicators Research, 89, 61–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Marmot, M. G. (2003). Health, wealth and lifestyles of the older population in England: the 2002 English longitudinal study of ageing. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor, M. F., Brice, J., Buck, N., & Prentice-Lane, E. (2003). British household panel survey user manual volume A. Introduction, technical report and appendices. Colchester, Essex: UK Data Archive, University of Essex.

    Google Scholar 

  11. The Korean Longitudinal Study of Ageing KLoSA (2006). http://klosa.re.kr/KLOSA/html_kor/klosaMeeting/KLoSA_2nd_meeting.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2008.

  12. HAPiEE Study (2005) UCL Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. Health, Alcohol and Psychosocial factors in Eastern Europe. http://www.ucl.ac.ul/easteurope/happie_open.htm. Accessed October 7, 2008.

  13. Von dem Knesebeck, O., Hyde, M., Higgs, P., Kupfer, A., & Siegrist, J. (2005). Quality of life and wellbeing. In A. Börsch-Supan, A. Brugiavini, H. Jürges, J. Mackenbach, J. Siegrist, & G. Weber (Eds.), Health, ageing and retirement in Europe: First results from the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe (pp. 199–203). Germany: Strauss, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ribu, L., Hanestad, B. R., Moum, T., Birkeland, K., & Rustoen, T. (2007). A comparison of the health-related quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcers, with a diabetes group and a nondiabetes group from the general population. Quality of Life Research, 16, 179–189.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown, N., Melville, M., Gray, D., Young, T., Munro, J., Skene, A. M., et al. (1999). Quality of life four years after acute myocardial infarction: Short form 36 scores compared with a normal population. Heart, 81, 352–358.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. van Jaarsveld, C. H. M., Sanderman, R., Miedema, I., Ranchor, A. V., & Kempen, G. I. J. M. (2001). Changes in health-related quality of life in older patients with acute myocardial infarction or congestive heart failure: A prospective study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49, 1052–1058.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barbareschi, G., Sanderman, R., Kempen, G.I., & Ranchor, A.V. (2009). Socioeconomic Status and the Course of Quality of Life in Older Patients with Coronary Heart Disease. Int J Behav Med (in press). doi:10.1007/s12529-008-9010-8.

  18. van Nispen, R. M., de Boer, M. R., Hoeijmakers, J. G., Ringens, P. J., & van Rens, G. H. (2009). Co-morbidity and visual acuity are risk factors for health-related quality of life decline: Five-month follow-up EQ-5D data of visually impaired older patients. Health and quality of life outcomes, 25, 7–18.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blane, D., Higgs, P., Hyde, M., & Wiggins, R. D. (2004). Life course influences on quality of life in early old age. Social Science in Medicine, 58, 2171–2179.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Blane, D. B., Netuveli, G., & Montgomery, S. M. (2008). Quality of life, health and physiological status and change at older ages. Social Science & Medicine, 66: e1579–e1587. http://www.shef.ac.uk/ageingresearch/pdf/qol_review_no_tables.pdf. Accessed August 11, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Netuveli, G., Wiggins, R. D., Hildon, Z., Montgomery, S. M., & Blane, D. B. (2005). Functional limitation in longstanding illness and quality of life: Evidence from a national survey. BMJ, 331, 1382–1383.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Netuveli, G., Wiggins, R. D., Hildon, Z., Montgomery, S. M., & Blane, D. B. (2006). Quality of life at older ages: evidence from the English longitudinal study of aging (wave 1). Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 60, 357–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiggins, R. D., Higgs, P., Hyde, M., & Blane, D. B. (2004). Quality of life in the third age: key predictors of the CASP-19 measure. Ageing and Society, 24, 693–708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Von dem Knesebeck, O., Wahrendorf, M., Hyde, M., & Siegrist, J. (2007). Socioeconomic Position and quality of life among older people in 10 European countries: Results of the SHARE study. Ageing & Society, 27(2), 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Banks, J., Breeze, E., Lessof, C., & Nazroo, J. (2006). Retirement, health and relationships of the older population in England: The 2004 English longitudinal study of ageing. London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Banks, J., Breeze, E., Lessof, C., & Nazroo, J. (2008). Living in the 21st century: older people in England: The 2006 English longitudinal study of ageing (wave 3). London: The Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (1995). Modeling the process of development via latent variable growth curve methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 2, 187–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Meredith, W., & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Muthén, B., & Khoo, S. T. (1998). Longitudinal studies of achievement growth using latent variable modeling. Learning and Individual Differences, Special issue: Latent growth curve analysis, 10, 73–101.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 1–33). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide (5th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Miyazaki, Y., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2000). Tests for linkage of multiple cohorts in an accelerated longitudinal design. Psychological Methods, 5, 44–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full estimation information in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides, R. E. Shumaker, & N. J. Mahwah (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modelling: Issues and techniques (pp. 243–277). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Enders, C. K., & Bandalos, D. L. (2001). The relative performance of maximum likelihood estimation for missing data in structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 430–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Wothke, W. (2000). Longitudinal and multigroup modelling with missing data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & L. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multiple group data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 219–240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Enders, C. K. (2001). The Performance of the full information maximum likelihood estimator in multiple regression models with missing data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61, 713–740.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wiggins, R. D., & Sacker, A. (2001). A comparative evaluation of strategies to handle missing data in the context of structural equation modelling: A user’s perspective. In G. Marcoulides & I. Moustaki (Eds.), Latent variable and latent structure models (pp. 105–120). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mirowsky, J., & Kim, J. (2007). Graphing age trajectories: Vector graphs, synthetic and virtual cohort projections, and virtual cohort projections, and cross-sectional profiles of depression. Sociological Methods & Research, 35, 497–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Higgs, P., Hyde, M., Wiggins, R. D., & Blane, D. (2003). Researching quality of life in early old age: the importance of the sociological dimension. Social Policy and Administration, 37, 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Laslett, P. (1996). A fresh map of life: The emergence of the third age. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  43. William, A. (1977). Measuring the quality of life of the elderly. In A. Evans & L. Wingo (Eds.), Public economics and the quality of life (pp. 13–27). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Stock, W. A., Okun, M. A., Haring, M. J., et al. (1983). Age and subjective well-being: A meta analysis. Evaluation studies Review Annual, 8, 279–302.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bowling, A. (2005). Ageing well: Quality of life in old age. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The ELSA study is supported by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Aging [5R01AG017644-08]; and the Office for National Statistics for UK Government departments [NT-4779A/01]. Amanda Sacker is funded in part by the ESRC [RES-596-28-0001; RES-518-28-5001].

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paola Zaninotto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaninotto, P., Falaschetti, E. & Sacker, A. Age trajectories of quality of life among older adults: results from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing. Qual Life Res 18, 1301–1309 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9543-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-009-9543-6

Keywords

Navigation