Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Does Inequity Aversion Motivate Punishment? Cleaner Fish as a Model System

  • Published:
Social Justice Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In human social interactions, punishment is often directed at cheating individuals. Subjective reports and neuro-imaging studies indicate that the experience of interacting with a cheat produces negative emotions and that the act of punishing a cheat assuages these feelings. However, while negative emotions may elicit punishment, the precise source of these emotions remains obscure. Specifically, it is often very difficult to tease apart whether punishing individuals are inequity averse (upset because cheating partner receives more than they should) or, more simply, whether they might be loss averse (upset because their payoffs did not meet their expectations). We compare results on punishment and inequity aversion in humans with results from a non-human model system, the cleaning mutualism between bluestreak cleaner wrasse (Labroides dimidiatus) and its reef-fish ‘clients’. Male cleaner fish are known to punish females that cheat during joint client inspections, but a recent study failed to demonstrate evidence for inequity aversion in this species. We suggest that punishment in cleaner fish may be motivated by loss aversion rather than inequity aversion. Punishment in humans might also often be motivated by loss aversion—and empirical studies that disentangle the two competing motives for punishment are a clear research priority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Boyd, R., Gintis, H., Bowles, S., & Richerson, P. J. (2003). The evolution of altruistic punishment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 100, 3531–3535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1992). Punishment allows the evolution of cooperation (or anything else) in sizeable groups. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bräuer, J., & Hanus, D. (2012). Social Justice Research (forthcoming).

  • Brosnan, S. F. (2011). A hypothesis of the co-evolution of cooperation and responses to inequity. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 5, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Monkeys reject unequal pay. Nature, 425, 297–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., Schiff, H. C., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2005). Tolerance for inequity may increase with social closeness in chimpanzees. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 272, 253–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brosnan, S. F., Talbot, C., Ahlgren, M., Lambeth, S. P., & Schapiro, S. P. (2010). Mechanisms underlying responses to inequitable outcomes in chimpanzees, Pan troglodytes. Animal Behaviour, 79, 1229–1237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R. (2001). The cleaner fish market. In R. Noë, J. A. R. A. M. Van Hooff, & P. Hammerstein (Eds.), Economics in nature (pp. 145–172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R. (2002). Biting cleaner fish use altruism to deceive image-scoring client reef fish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 269, 2087–2093.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R., & Bronstein, J. L. (2004). Game structures in mutualistic interactions: What can the evidence tell us about the kind of models we need? Advances in the Study of Behavior, 34, 59–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R., & Grutter, A. S. (2002). Asymmetric cheating opportunities and partner control in a cleaning mutualism. Animal Behaviour, 63, 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R., & Grutter, A. S. (2005). Punishment and partner switching cause cooperative behaviour in a cleaning mutualism. Biology Letters, 1, 395–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R., & Grutter, A. S. (2006). Image scoring and cooperation in a cleaner fish mutualism. Nature, 441, 975–978.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R., Grutter, A. S., Willener, A. S. T., & Leimar, O. (2008). Pairs of cooperating cleaner fish provide better service quality than singletons. Nature, 455, 964–966.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bshary, R., & Würth, M. (2001). Cleaner fish Labroides dimidiatus manipulate client reef fish by providing tactile stimulation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 268, 1495–1501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckholtz, J. W., Asplund, C. L., Dux, P. E., Zald, D. H., Gore, J. C., Jones, O. D., et al. (2008). The neural correlates of third-party punishment. Neuron, 60, 930–940.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments in strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Russell Sage Foundation, Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (1993). Information, fairness, and efficiency in bargaining. In B. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: Theory and applications (pp. 155–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M. K., & Santos, L. R. (2006). Some thoughts on the adaptive function of inequity aversion: An alternative to Brosnan’s social hypothesis. Social Justice Research, 19, 201–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clague, G. E., Cheney, K. L., Goldizen, A. W., McCormick, M. I., Waldie, P. A., & Grutter, A. S. (2011). Long-term cleaner fish presence affects growth of a coral reef fish. Biology Letter, 7, 863–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Parker, G. A. (1995). Punishment in animal societies. Nature, 373, 209–216.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coté, I. M. (2000). Evolution and ecology of cleaning symbioses in the sea. Oceanography and Marine Biology, 38, 311–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., McElreath, R., & Smirnov, O. (2007). Egalitarian motives in humans. Nature, 446, 794–796.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Quervain, D. J. F., Fischbacher, U., Treyer, V., Schellhammer, M., Schnyder, U., Buck, A., et al. (2004). The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science, 305, 1254–1258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • dos Santos, M., Rankin, D., & Wedekind, C. (2011). The evolution of punishment through reputation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 278, 371–377.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dreber, A., Rand, D. G., Fudenburg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2008). Winners don’t punish. Nature, 452, 348–351.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ebran, N., Julien, S., Orange, N., Saglio, P., Lemaitre, P., & Molle, G. (1999). Pore-forming properties and antibacterial activity of proteins extracted from epidermal mucus of fish. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 122, 181–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egas, M., & Riedl, A. (2008). The economics of altruistic punishment and the maintenance of cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 275, 871–878.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U. (2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 63–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415, 137–140.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. M. (1999). A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114, 817–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, G. E. (2008). Attending to the outcome of others: Disadvantageous inequity aversion in male capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). American Journal of Primatology, 70, 901–905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H. (2005). Altruistic punishment and the evolution of cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 7047–7049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler, J. H., Johnson, T., & Smirnov, O. (2005). Egalitarian motive and altruistic punishment. Nature, 433, 7021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenburg, D., & Pathak, P. A. (2010). Unobserved punishment supports cooperation. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 78–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gächter, S., Renner, E., & Sefton, M. (2008). The long-run benefits of punishment. Science, 322, 1510.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, A., & West, S. A. (2004). Cooperation and punishment, especially in humans. The American Naturalist, 164, 753–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, V., & Mengel, F. (2011). Let me sleep on it: Delay reduces rejection rates in ultimatum games. Economic Letters, 111, 113–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grutter, A. S. (1996). Parasite removal rates by the cleaner wrasse Labroides dimidiatus. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 130, 61–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grutter, A. S., & Bshary, R. (2003). Cleaner wrasse prefer client mucus: Support for partner control mechanisms in cleaning interactions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 270, S242–S244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grutter, A. S., & Bshary, R. (2004). Cleaner fish, Labroides dimidiatus, diet preferences for different types of mucus and parasitic gnathiid isopods. Animal Behaviour, 68, 583–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., & Schwarze, B. (1982). An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3, 367–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrmann, B., Thöni, C., & Gächter, S. (2008). Antisocial punishment across societies. Science, 319, 1362–1367.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, A. (2012). Fair is fine, but more is better: Limits to inequity aversion in the domestic dog. Social Justice Research, 25. doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0158-7.

  • Jensen, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Chimpanzees are vengeful but not spiteful. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 13046–13050.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, K., Call, J., & Tomasello, M. (2007). Chimpanzees are rational maximizers in an ultimatum game. Science, 318, 107–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, T., Dawes, C. T., Fowler, J. H., McElreath, R., & Smirnov, O. (2009). The role of egalitarian motives in altruistic punishment. Economic Letters, 102, 192–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, R. A., & Bshary, R. (2002). From parasitism to mutualism: Partner control in asymmetric interactions. Ecology Letters, 5, 634–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagel, J. H., Kim, C., & Moser, D. (1996). Fairness in ultimatum games with asymmetric information and asymmetric payoffs. Games and Economic Behavior, 13, 100–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurzban, R., DeScioli, P., & O’Brien, E. (2007). Audience effects on moralistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledyard, J. (1995). Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J. Kagel & A. Roth (Eds.), Handbook of experimental economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, L., Rousset, F., Roze, D., & Keller, L. (2007). Strong reciprocity or strong ferocity? A population genetic view of the evolution of altruistic punishment. The American Naturalist, 170, 21–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leliveld, M. C., van Dijk, E., & van Beest, I. (2008). Initial ownership in bargaining: Introducing the giving, splitting, and taking ultimatum bargaining game. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1214–1225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Massen, J. J. M., van den Berg, L. M., Spruijt, B. M., & Sterck, E. H. M. (2011). Inequity aversion in relation to effort and relationship quality in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). American Journal of Primatology, 73, 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathew, S., & Boyd, R. (2011). Punishment sustains large-scale cooperation in prestate warfare. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 108, 11375–11380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munier, B., & Zaharia, C. (2003). High stakes and acceptance behavior in ultimatum bargaining. Theory and Decision, 53, 187–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamaru, M., & Iwasa, Y. (2006). The coevolution of altruism and punishment: Role of the selfish punisher. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 240, 475–488.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nakashima, Y., Sakai, Y., Karino, K., & Kuwamura, T. (2000). Female-female spawning and sex change in a haremic coral-reef fish, Labroides dimidiatus. Zoological Science, 17, 967–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neiworth, J. J., Johnson, E. T., Whillock, K., Greenberg, J., & Brown, V. (2009). Is a sense of inequity an ancestral primate trait? Testing social inequity in cotton-top tamarins (Sanguinus oedipus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 123, 10–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nelissen, R. A. (2008). The price you pay: Cost-dependent reputation effects of altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 242–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., Page, K. M., & Sigmund, K. (2000). Fairness versus reason in the ultimatum game. Science, 289, 1773–1775.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J., & Bekoff, M. (2012). Wild justice redux: What we know about social justice in animals and why it matters. Social Justice Research, 25. doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0154-y.

  • Pinto, A., Oates, J., Grutter, A. S., & Bshary, R. (2011). Cleaner wrasses Labroides dimidiatus are more cooperative in the presence of an audience. Current Biology, 21, 1140–1144.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Price, S. A., & Brosnan, S. F. (2012). To each according to his need? Variability in the responses to inequity in non-human primates. Social Justice Research, 25. doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0153-z.

  • Raihani, N. J., & Bshary, R. (2011). The evolution of punishment in n-player public goods games: A volunteer’s dilemma. Evolution, 65, 2725–2728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raihani, N. J., Grutter, A. S., & Bshary, R. (2010). Punishers benefit from third-party punishment in fish. Science, 327, 171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raihani, N. J., Grutter, A. S., & Bshary, R. (2012). Female cleaner fish cooperate more with unfamiliar males. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.0063.

  • Raihani, N. J., McAuliffe, K., Brosnan, S. F., & Bshary, R. Are cleaner fish (Labroides dimidiatus) inequity averse? Animal Behaviour (under review).

  • Raihani, N. J., Pinto, A. I., Grutter, A. S., Wismer, S., & Bshary, R. (2012). Male cleaner wrasses adjust punishment of female partners according to the stakes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 279, 365–370.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raihani, N. J., Thornton, A. N., & Bshary, R. (2012). Punishment and cooperation in nature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.12.004.

  • Rand, D. G., Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Fudenburg, D., & Nowak, M. A. (2009a). Positive interactions promote public cooperation. Science, 325, 1272–1275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rand, D. G., Ohtsuki, H., & Nowak, M. A. (2009b). Direct reciprocity with costly punishment: Generous tit-for-tat prevails. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 256, 45–57.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, J. E. (1958). A review of the Labrid Fish genus Labroides with descriptions of two new species and notes on ecology. Pacific Science, 12, 327–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Range, F., Horn, L., Viranyi, Z., & Huber, L. (2009). The absence of reward induces inequity aversion in dogs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 340–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Range, F., Leitner, K., & Virányi, Z. (2012). The influence of the relationship and motivation on inequity aversion in dogs. Social Justice Research, 25. doi:10.1007/s11211-012-0155-x

  • Roberts, G. (2005). Cooperation through interdependence. Animal Behaviour, 70, 901–908.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson, D. R. (1972). Social control of sex reversal in a coral-reef fish. Science, 177, 1007–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A. E., & Schoumaker, F. (1983). Expectations and reputations in bargaining: An experimental study. American Economic Review, 73, 362–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sääksvuori, L., Mappes, T., & Puurtinen, M. (2011). Costly punishment prevails in intergroup conflict. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences, 278, 3428–3436.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salwiczek, L. H., & Bshary, R. (2011). Cleaner wrasses keep track of the ‘when’ and ‘what’ in a foraging task. Ethology, 117, 939–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanfey, A. G., Rilling, J. K., Aronson, J. A., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2003). The neural basis of economic decision-making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300, 1755–1758.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos, L. R., Sulkowski, G., Spaepen, G. M., & Hauser, M. D. (2002). Object individuation using property/kind information in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). Cognition, 83, 241–264.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slembeck, T. (1999) Reputations and fairness in bargaining—experimental evidence from a repeated ultimatum game with fixed opponents. Discussion Paper, University of St. Gallen.

  • Soares, M. C., Oliveira, R. F., Ros, A. F. H., Grutter, A. S., & Bshary, R. (2011). Tactile stimulation lowers stress in fish. Nature Communications, 2, 534–535.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Straub, P. G., & Murnighan, J. K. (1995). An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 27, 345–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strobel, A., Zimmermann, J., Schmitz, A., Reuter, M., Lis, S., Windmann, S., et al. (2011). Beyond revenge: Neural and genetic bases of altruistic punishment. Neuroimage, 54, 671–680.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tinklepaugh, O. L. (1928). An experimental study of representative factors in monkeys. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 8, 197–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wolkenten, M., Brosnan, S. F., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2007). Inequity responses of monkeys modified by effort. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 104, 18854–18859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, C. S., Sivanathan, N., Narayanan, J., Ganegoda, D. B., Bauer, M., Bodenhausen, G. V., et al. (2011). Retribution and emotional regulation: The effects of time delay in angry economic interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. J., Zhang, B. Y., Zhou, Z. X., He, Q. Q., Zheng, X. D., Cressman, R., et al. (2009). Costly punishment does not always increase cooperation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 17448–17451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, E., & Houser, D. (2005). Emotion expression in human punishment behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 102, 7398–7401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T. (1986). The provision of a sanctioning system as a public good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 110–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., Horita, Y., Takagishi, H., Shinada, M., Tanida, S., & Cook, K. S. (2009). The private rejection of unfair offers and emotional commitment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 106, 11520–11523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto, S., & Takimoto, A. (2012). Social Justice Research (forthcoming).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University College London, Gower St, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

    Nichola J. Raihani

  2. Harvard University, Boston, MA, USA

    Katherine McAuliffe

Authors
  1. Nichola J. Raihani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katherine McAuliffe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nichola J. Raihani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raihani, N.J., McAuliffe, K. Does Inequity Aversion Motivate Punishment? Cleaner Fish as a Model System. Soc Just Res 25, 213–231 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0157-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-012-0157-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation