Skip to main content
Log in

An Efficient Protocol for Ulmus minor Mill. Protoplast Isolation and Culture in Agarose Droplets

  • Original paper
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We describe here an efficient and reproducible protocol for isolation and culture of protoplasts from Ulmus minor. Different sources of donor tissues were tested for protoplast isolation: callus and juvenile leaves from in vitro and greenhouse plants. Several combinations and concentrations of hydrolytic enzymes were used. Comparative tests between Cellulase Onozuka R10 and Cellulase Onozuka RS were made and the last one proved to be more efficient. Both the pectinases used, Macerozyme Onozuka R10 and Pectinase (Sigma®), were efficient in protoplast isolation and there was no need for a more active pectinase. In vitro leaves proved to be the best source for protoplast isolation and produced an average of 3.96 × 107 protoplasts per gram of fresh weigh. Elm mesophyll protoplasts were cultured using the advantageous method of agarose droplets and a modification of the Kao and Michayluk culture medium, using two plating densities (1 × 105 and 2 × 105 protoplasts ml−1). Protoplast division and evolution into colonies and microcalli was promoted in the agarose droplets plated at 2 × 105 protoplasts ml−1. Ten weeks after protoplast culture initiation a plating efficiency of 2.7% was attained and the bigger microcalli, with at least 0.5 mm diameter, were transferred to a solid medium previously used for the production of embryogenic callus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BAP:

Benzylaminopurine

CH:

Casein hydrolysate

CPW:

Inorganic salts of Power and Chapman (1985)

2,4-D:

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid

DED:

Dutch elm disease

DKW:

Driver and Kuniyuki (1984) medium

FDA:

Fluorescein diacetate

IBA:

Indole−3-butyric acid

Kin:

Kinetin

KM8p:

8p Medium from Kao and Michayluk (1975)

MES buffer:

2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic acid

MS:

Murashige and Skoog (1962) medium

PVP-10:

Polyvinylpyrrolidone

References

  • Anthony P, Otoni W, Power JB, Lowe KC, Davey MR (1999) Protoplast isolation, culture and plant regeneration from Passiflora. In: Hall RD (ed) Methods in molecular biology vol. 111, plant cell culture protocols. Humana Press, Totowa, New Jersey, pp 169–181

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Conde P, Loureiro J, Santos C (2004) Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration from leaves of Ulmus minor Mill. Plant Cell Rep 22(9):632–639

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Corredoira E, Vieitez AM, Ballester A (2002) Somatic embryogenesis in elm. Ann Bot 89:637–644

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davey MR, Anthony P, Power JB, Lowe KC (2005) Plant protoplasts: status and biotechnological perspectives. Biotechnol Adv 23:131–171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domir SC, Sticklen MB, Pijut PM, Bolyard MG, Lineberger RD (1993) Micropropagation and regeneration of DED-resistant elms using protoplast and tissue culture techniques. In: Sticklen MB, Sherald JM (eds) Dutch elm disease research, cellular and molecular approaches. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 81–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Dons JJM, Colijn-Hooymans CM (1989) Agarose plating of protoplasts and its applications. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol. 8, plant protoplasts and genetic engineering I. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 50–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorion N, Ben Jouira H, Danthu P, Bigot C (1994) Regeneration of plants from protoplasts of Ulmus species (elms). In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry vol. 29, plant protoplasts and genetic engineering V. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 172–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver JA, Kuniyuki AH (1984) In vitro propagation of paradox walnut rootstock. HortSci 19:507–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn CP (2000) The elms, breeding, conservation and disease management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dodrecht, London, 361 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Dytham C (1999) Choosing and using statistics, a biologist’s guide. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartland KMA, McHugh AT, Crow RM, Garg A, Jill S (2005) 2004 SIVB congress symposium proceeding: biotechnological progress in dealing with dutch elm disease. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 41:364–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartland J, Brasier C, Fenning T, Birch R, Gartland KM (2001) Ri-plasmid mediated transformation and regeneration of Ulmus procera (English elm). Plant Growth Regul 33:123–129

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gartland J, McHugh A, Brasier C, Irvine R, Fenning T, Gartland KM (2000) Regeneration of phenotypically normal English elm (Ulmus procera) plantlets following transformation with an Agrobacterium tumefaciens binary vector. Tree Physiol 20:901–907

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kao KN, Michayluk MR (1975) Nutritional requirements for growth of Vicia hajastana cells and protoplasts at a very low population density in liquid media. Planta 126:105–110

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kirby EG, Campbell MA, Penchel RM (1989) Isolation and culture of protoplasts of forest trees species. In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry, vol. 8, plant protoplasts and genetic engineering I. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 262–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plantarum 15:473–497

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Power JB, Chapman JV (1985) Isolation, culture and genetic manipulation of plant protoplasts. In: Dixon RA (ed) Plant cell culture, a practical approach. IRL Press, Oxford, Washington DC, pp 37–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Smalley EB, Guries RP (2000) Asian elms: sources of disease and insect resistance. In: Dunn CP (ed) The elms, breeding, conservation and disease management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, London, pp 215–230

    Google Scholar 

  • Sticklen MB, Domir SC, Lineberger RD (1986) Shoot regeneration from protoplasts of Ulmus × ‘Pioneer’. Plant Sci 47:29–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sticklen MB, Hajela RK, Bolyard MG, Graham LS, Sherald JL (1994) Genetic transformation in Ulmus species (elms). In: Bajaj YPS (ed) Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry vol. 29, plant protoplasts and genetic engineering V. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 401–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Sticklen MB, Lineberger RD, Domir SC (1985) Isolation and culture of protoplasts of Ulmus × ‘Homestead’. Plant Sci 41:117–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung EC (1995) Structural and developmental patterns in somatic embryogenesis. In: Thorpe TA (ed). In vitro embryogenesis in plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp. 205–247

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Conde.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conde, P., Santos, C. An Efficient Protocol for Ulmus minor Mill. Protoplast Isolation and Culture in Agarose Droplets. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 86, 359–366 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9122-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-006-9122-2

Keywords

Navigation