Skip to main content
Log in

A Cambrian micro-lobopodian and the evolution of arthropod locomotion and reproduction

  • Articles
  • Geology
  • Published:
Chinese Science Bulletin

Abstract

The evolutionary success of arthropods, the most abundant and diverse animal group, is mainly based on their segmented body and jointed appendages, features that had evolved most likely already before the Cambrian. The first arthropod-like animals, the lobopodians from the Early Cambrian, were unsclerotized and worm-like, and they had unjointed tubular legs. Here we describe the first three-dimensionally preserved Cambrian lobopodian. The material presented of Orstenotubulus evamuellerae gen. et sp. nov. is the smallest and youngest of a lobopodian known. O. evamuellerae shows strikingly detailed similarities to Recent tardigrades and/or onychophorans in its cellular-structured cuticle and the telescopic spines. It also shows similarities to other, longer known lobopodians, but which are ten times as large as the new form. These similarities include the finely annulated body and legs, which is characteristic also for Recent onychophorans, and paired humps continuing into spines situated dorsally to the leg insertions, a feature lacking in the extant forms. The morphology of O. evamuellerae not only elucidates our knowledge about lobopodians, but also aids in a clearer picture of the early evolution of arthropods. An example is the single ventral gonopore between a limb pair of O. evamuellerae, which indicates that a single gonopore, as developed in onychophorans, tardigrades, pentastomids, myriapods and insects, might represent the plesiomorphic state for Arthropoda, while the paired state in chelicerates and crustaceans was convergently achieved. Concerning life habits, the lateral orientation of the limbs and their anchoring spines of the new lobopodian imply that early arthropods were crawlers rather than walkers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Maas A, Waloszek D, Chen J Y, et al. Phylogeny and life habits of early arthropods—predation in the early Cambrian sea. Prog Nat Sci, 2004, 14: 1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Waloszek D, Chen J Y, Maas A, et al. Early Cambrian arthropods—new insights into arthropod head and structural evolution. Arthr Str Dev, 2005, 34: 189–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Conway Morris S, Whittington H B, Briggs D E G, et al. Atlas of the Burgess Shale. London: The Palaeontological Association, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ramsköld L, Hou X G. New early Cambrian animal and onychophoran affinities of enigmatic metazoans. Nature, 1991, 351: 225–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramsköld L. Homologies in Cambrian Onychophora. Lethaia, 1992, 25: 443–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen J Y, Zhou G Q, Ramsköld, L. A new Early Cambrian onychophoran-like animal, Paucipodia gen. nov., from the Chengjiang fauna, China. Trans R Soc Edinb, Earth Sci, 1994, 85: 275–282

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hou X G, Bergström, J. Cambrian lobopodians—Ancestors of extant onychophorans? Zool J Linn Soc, 1995, 114: 3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Budd G E, Peel J S. A new xenusiid lobopod from the Early Cambrian Sirius Passet fauna of north Greenland. Palaeontology, 1998, 41: 1201–1213

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ramsköld L, Chen J Y. Cambrian lobopodians: morphology and phylogeny. In: Edgecombe G D, ed. Arthropod Fossils and Phylogeny. New York: Columbia University Press, 1998. 107–150

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maas A, Waloszek D. Cambrian derivatives of the early arthropod stem lineage, pentastomids, tardigrades and lobopodians—an ‘Orsten’ perspective. Zool Anz, 2001, 240: 449–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Monge-Nájera J, Hou X G. Disparity, decimation and the Cambrian ‘explosion’: comparison of early Cambrian and present faunal communities with emphasis on velvet worms (Onychophora). Rev Biol Trop, 2002, 48: 333–351

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bergström J, Hou X G. Cambrian Onychophora or xenusians. Zool Anz, 2001, 240: 237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dzik J. Early Cambrian lobopodian sclerites and associated fossils from Kazakhstan. Palaeontology, 2003, 46: 93–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bergström J, Hou X G. Chengjiang arthropods and their bearing on early arthropod evolution. In: Edgecombe G D, ed. Arthropod Fossils and phylogeny. New York: Columbia Univ Press, 1998. 151–184

    Google Scholar 

  15. Whittington H B. The lobopod animal Aysheaia pedunculata Walcott, Middle Cambrian, Burgess Shale, British Columbia. Phil Trans R Soc London, B, 1978, 284: 165–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hou X G, Aldridge R J, Bergström J, et al. The Cambrian fossils of Chengjiang, China—The Flowering of Early Animal Life. Malden: Blackwell, 2004

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu J, Shu D G, Han J, et al. A large xenusiid lobopod with complex appendages from the Lower Cambrian Chengjiang Lagerstätte. Acta Pal Pol, 2006, 51: 215–222

    Google Scholar 

  18. Waloszek D. The ‘Orsten’ window—a three-dimensionally preserved Upper Cambrian meiofauna and its contribution to the understanding of the evolution of Arthropoda. Pal Res, 2003, 7: 71–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mass A, Braun A, Dong X P, et al. The ‘Orsten’—More than a Cambrian Konservat-Lagerstätte yielding exceptional preservation. Palaeoworld, 2006, 15: 266–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Storch V, Ruhberg H. Onychophora. In: Harrison F W, Rice M E, eds. Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates. New York: Wiley, 1993. 11–56

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dzik J, Krumbiegel G. The oldest ‘onychophoran’ Xenusion: a link connecting phyla? Lethaia, 1989, 22: 169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Conway Morris S. A new Metazoan from the Cambrian Burgess Shale of British Columbia. Palaeontology, 1977, 20: 623–640

    Google Scholar 

  23. Liu J, Shu D G, Han J, et al. A rare lobopod with well-preserved eyes from Chengjiang Lagerstätte and its implications for origin of arthropods. Chin Sci Bull, 2004, 49(9): 1063–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kristensen R M. Sense Organs of Two Marine Arthrotardigrades (Heterotardigrada, Tardigrada). Acta Zool, 1981, 62: 27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kristensen R M, Higgins R P. Revision of Styraconyx (Tardigrada: Halechiniscidae), with Description of Two New Species from Disko Bay, West Greenland. Smith Contr Zool, 1984, 391: 1–40

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mayer G. Origin and differentiation of nephridia provide no support for the Articulata. Zoomorphology, 2006, 125: 1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Budd G E. Why are arthropods segmented? Evol Dev, 2001, 3: 332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Walker M H, Tait N N. Studies of embryonic development and the reproductive cycle in ovoviviparous Australian Onychophora (Peripatopsidae). J Zool, 2004, 264: 333–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bertolani R, Grimaldi De Zio S, D’Addabbo Gallo M, et al. Postembryonic development in heterotardigrades. Monitore Zoologico Italiano (N.S.), 1984, 18: 307–320

    Google Scholar 

  30. Walossek D, Müller K J. Upper Cambrian stem-lineage crustaceans and their bearing upon the monophyletic origin of Crustacea and the position of Agnostus. Lethaia, 1990, 23: 409–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Maas.

About this article

Cite this article

Maas, A., Mayer, G., Kristensen, R.M. et al. A Cambrian micro-lobopodian and the evolution of arthropod locomotion and reproduction. Chin. Sci. Bull. 52, 3385–3392 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0515-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0515-3

Key words

Navigation