Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Social Norms and Beliefs Regarding Sexual Risk and Pregnancy Involvement among Adolescent Males Treated for Dating Violence Perpetration

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study explored perceived sexual norms and behaviors related to sexual risk and pregnancy involvement among adolescent males (ages 13 to 20) participating in programs for perpetrators of dating violence. The purpose of this study was to generate hypotheses regarding the contexts and mechanisms underlying the intersection of adolescent dating violence, sexual risk and pregnancy. Six focus groups were conducted (N = 34 participants). A number of major themes emerged: 1) male norm of multiple partnering, 2) perceived gain of male social status from claims of sexual activity, 3) perception that rape is uncommon combined with belief that girls claiming to be raped are liars, 4) perception that men rationalize rapes to avoid responsibility, 5) condom non-use in the context of rape and sex involving substance use, 6) beliefs that girls lie and manipulate boys in order to become pregnant and trap them into relationships, and 7) male avoidance of responsibility and negative responses to pregnancy. The combination of peer-supported norms of male multiple partnering and adversarial sexual beliefs appear to support increased male sexual risk, lack of accountability for sexual risk, and rationalization of rape and negative responses to pregnancy. Further research focused on the context of male sexual risk and abusive relationship behaviors is needed to inform intervention with young men to promote sexual health and prevent rape, dating violence, and adolescent pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brener N, Lowry R, Kann L, et al. Trends in sexual risk behaviors among high school students—United States, 1991–2001. MMWR. 2002;51:856–859.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CDC. Cases of HIV infection and AIDS in the United States, 2004. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/stats/2004SurveillanceReport.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2005.

  3. CDC. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance, 2004. Available at: http://www. cdc.gov/std/stats/04pdf/2004SurveillanceAll.pdf. Accessed December 10, 2005.

  4. Henshaw SK. Unintended pregnancy in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1998;30(1):24–29,46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Silverman JG, Raj A, Mucci LA, Hathaway JE. Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. JAMA. 2001;286(5):572–579.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Silverman JG, Raj A, Clements K. Dating violence and sexual risk in a representative sample of high school students. Pediatrics. 2004;114(2):e220–e225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Roberts TA, Auinger P, Klein JD. Intimate partner abuse and the reproductive health of sexually active female adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2005;36(5):380–385.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wingood GM, DiClemente RJ, McCree DH, Harrington K, Davies SL. Dating violence and the sexual health of black adolescent females. Pediatrics. 2001;107(5):E72, May.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Decker MR, Silverman JG, Raj A. Dating violence and sexually transmitted disease/HIV testing and diagnosis among adolescent females. Pediatrics. 2005;116(2):e272–e276, Aug.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Campbell JC, Woods AB, Chouaf KL, Parker B. Reproductive health consequences of intimate partner violence. A nursing research review. Clin Nurs Res. 2000;9(3):217–237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Eisenstat SA, Bancroft L. Domestic violence. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(12):886–892.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gazmararian JA, Petersen R, Spitz AM, Goodwin MM, Saltzman LE, Marks JS. Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions. Matern Child Health J. 2000;4(2):79–84, Jun.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hathaway JE, Mucci LA, Silverman JG, Brooks DR, Mathews R, Pavlos CA. Health status and health care use of Massachusetts women reporting partner abuse. Am J Prev Med. 2000;19(4):302–307.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Dunkle KL, Jewkes RK, Brown HC, Gray GE, McIntryre JA, Harlow SD. Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. Lancet. 2004;363(9419):1415–1421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Raj A, Silverman JG, Amaro H. Abused women report greater male partner risk and gender-based risk for HIV: findings from a community-based study with Hispanic women. AIDS Care. 2004;16:519–529.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bauer HM, Gibson P, Hernandez M, Kent C, Klausner J, Bolan G. Intimate partner violence and high-risk sexual behaviors among female patients with sexually transmitted diseases. Sex Transm Dis. 2002;29(7):411–416.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. El Bassel N, Fontdevila J, Gilbert L, Voisin D, Richman BL, Pitchell P. HIV risks of men in methadone maintenance programs who abuse their intimate partners: a forgotten issue. J Subst Abuse. 2001;12(1–2):29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Raj A, Santana MC, LaMarche A, Amaro H, Cranston K, Silverman JG. Perpetration of partner violence associated with sexual risk behaviors among young adult men. Am J Public Health. In press.

  19. Crosby RA, Graham CA, Yarber WL, Sanders SA. If the condom fits, wear it: a qualitative study of young African-American men. Sex Transm Infect. 2004;80:306–309.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Harper GW, Gannon C, Watson SE, Catania JA, Dolcini MM. The role of close friends in African American adolescents' dating and sexual behavior. J Sex Res. 2004;41(4):351–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hoppe MJ, Graham L, Wilsdon A, Wells EA, Nahom D, Morrison DM. Teens speak out about HIV/AIDS: focus group discussions about risk and decision-making. J Adolesc Health. 2004;35(345):e27.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. MacPhail C, Campbell C. “I think condoms are good but, aai, I hate those things”: condom use among adolescents and young people in a Southern African township. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52(11):1613–1627.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Bauman LJ, Berman R. Adolescent relationships and condom use: trust, love and commitment. AIDS Behav. 2005;9(2):211–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. DeVisser R. Delayed application of condoms, withdrawal and negotiation of safer sex among heterosexual young adults. AIDS Care. 2004;16(3):315–322.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaestle CE, Halpern CT. Sexual activity among adolescents in romantic relationships with friends, acquaintances, or strangers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005;159:849–853.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lesser J, Tello J, Koniak_Griffin D, Kappos B, Rhys M. Young Latino fathers' perceptions of paternal role and risk for HIV/AIDS. Hispanic J Behav Sci. 2001;23(3):327–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Robinson N. The use of focus group methodology—with selected examples from sexual health research. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29(4):905–913.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. National Institute of Justice. Batterer intervention: program approaches and criminal justice strategies. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs; 1998.

  29. Pollner M. The effects of interviewer gender in mental health interviews. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1998;186(6):369–373.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lamb ME, Garretson ME. The effects of interviewer gender and child gender on the informativeness of alleged child sexual abuse victims in forensic interviews. Law Hum Behav. 2003;27(2):157–171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Glaser BSA. The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Chicago: Aldine; 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Atlas.ti. The Knowledge Workbench. [computer program]. Version WIN 5.0 (Build 066). Berlin: Scientific Software Development; 1997–2001.

  33. Weitzman EA. Analyzing qualitative data with computer software. Health Serv Res. 1998;34:1241–1263.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nzioka C. Perspectives of adolescent boys on the risks of unwanted pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections: Kenya. Reprod Health Matters. 2001;9(17):108–117.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Varga CA. How gender roles influence sexual and reproductive health among South African adolescents. Stud Fam Plann. 2003;34(3):160–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Poulin C, Graham L. The association between substance use, unplanned sexual intercourse and other sexual behaviours among adolescent students. Addiction. 2001;96:607–621.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Santelli JS, Robin L, Brener ND, Lowry R. Timing of alcohol and other drug use and sexual risk behaviors among unmarried adolescents and young adults. Fam Plann Perspect. 2001;33(5):200–205.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Graves KL, Leigh BC. The relationship of substance use to sexual activity among young adults in the United States. Fam Plann Perspect. 1995;27(1):18–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Lisak D, Miller PM. Repeat rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence Vict. 2002;17(1):73–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Ampofo AA. “When men speak women listen”: gender socialization and young adolescents' attitudes to sexual and reproductive issues. Afr J Reprod Health. 2001;5(3):196–212.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Krulewitch CJ, Roberts DW. Adolescent pregnancy and homicide: findings from the Maryland Office of the Chief Medical Examiner. Child Maltreat. 2003;8(2):122–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interactions between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16:103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Barker GU. Where the boys are: attitudes related to masculinity, fatherhood, and violence toward women among low-income adolescent and young adult males in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Youth Soc. 1997;29(2):166–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research described was supported by grants to J. Silverman from the Division of Reproductive Health/CDC (U36/CCU300430-23) and to E. Miller from the W.T. Grant Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jay G. Silverman PhD.

Additional information

Silverman, Decker, Reed, and Hathaway are with the Harvard School of Public Health, Department of Society, Human Development and Health, Boston, MA, USA; Rothman and Raj are with the Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Boston, MA, USA; Miller is with the Harvard Medical School, Department of Adolescent Medicne, Boston, MA, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Silverman, J.G., Decker, M.R., Reed, E. et al. Social Norms and Beliefs Regarding Sexual Risk and Pregnancy Involvement among Adolescent Males Treated for Dating Violence Perpetration. JURH 83, 723–735 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9056-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9056-3

Keywords

Navigation