Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of a Gun Dealer's Change in Sales Practices on the Supply of Guns to Criminals

  • Published:
Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Licensed gun dealers are a major conduit for gun trafficking. Prior to May 1999, a single gun store sold more than half of the guns recovered from criminals in Milwaukee, WI, shortly following retail sale. On May 10, 1999, the store stopped selling small, inexpensive handguns popular with criminals, often called “Saturday night specials.” The purpose of this study was to estimate the effect of this gun store's changed sales practices on criminals' acquisition of new guns. We used an interrupted time-series design with comparisons to test for changes in the number of guns that police recovered from criminals within a year of retail sale following the gun dealer's new sales policy. The dealer's changed sales policy was associated with a 96% decrease in recently sold, small, inexpensive handguns use in crime in Milwaukee, a 73% decrease in crime guns recently sold by this dealer, and a 44% decrease in the flow of all new, trafficked guns to criminals in Milwaukee. The findings demonstrate the substantial impact that a single gun store's sales practices can have on the supply of new guns to criminals. Proposed anti-gun-trafficking efforts in other cities could benefit from targeting problem retail outlets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. National Center for Injury Prevention and Control. Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System (WISQARS): Fatal and Non-Fatal Injury Reports. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia. Available at:http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/wisqars/ Accessed February 8, 2006.

  2. Decker S, Pennell S. Arrestees and Guns: Monitoring the Illegal Firearms Market. National Institute of Justice Research Preview. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of Justice; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Marks A. New York turns up heat on gun dealers. Christ Sci Monit. February 16, 2006; A3.

  4. Levenson M. Menino launches national anti-gun-violence initiative. Boston Globe. January 26, 2006; B4.

  5. Spielman F. Daley takes another shot at gun-control legislation. The Chicago Sun Times. January 5, 2006; A8.

  6. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Following the Gun: Enforcing Federal Laws Against Firearms Traffickers. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of the Treasury; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sorenson SB, Vittes KA. Buying a handgun for someone else: firearm dealers' willingness to sell. Inj Prev. 2003;9:147–150.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Commerce in Firearms in the United States. Washington, District of Columbia: U.S. Department of the Treasury; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wintemute GJ, Cook PJ, Wright MA. Risk factors among handgun retailers for frequent and disproportionate sales of guns used in violent and firearm related crimes. Inj Prev. 2005;11:357–363.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wintemute GJ, Parham CA, Wright MA, Beaumont JJ, Drake CM. Weapons of choice: previous criminal history, later criminal activity, and firearm preference among legally authorized young adult purchasers of handguns. J Trauma. 1998;44:155–160.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vernick JS, Webster DW, Hepburn LM. Effects of Maryland's law banning Saturday night special handguns on crime guns. Inj Prev. 1999;5:259–263.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Webster DW, Vernick JS, Hepburn LM. Effects of Maryland's law banning Saturday night special handguns on homicides. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;155:406–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McBride J. Local store leads U.S. in ‘crime guns.’ Milwaukee Journal Sentinel May 9, 1999. Available at:http://www.jsonline.com/news/may99/0509gun.asp.

  14. Gun shop pulls ‘Saturday night specials’ from shelves. Associated Press State and Local Newswire. May 11, 1999.

  15. Cook TD, Campbell DT. Quasi-Experimentation: Design and Analysis Issues for Field Settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Crime Gun Trace Reports (2000): National Report. Washington, District of Columbia: Department of the Treasury; July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cook PJ, Braga AA. Comprehensive firearms tracing: strategic and investigative uses of new data on firearms markets. Ariz Law Rev. 2001;43:277–309.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pierce GL, Braga AA, Koper C, McDevitt J, Carlson D, Roth J, Saiz A, et al. The Characteristics and Dynamics of Crime Gun Markets: Implications for Supply-Side Focused Enforcement Strategies. Final report prepared for the National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, District of Columbia, September 2003.

  19. Braga AA, Pierce GL. Disrupting illegal firearms markets in Boston: the effects of Operation Ceasefire on the supply of new handguns to criminals. Criminol Public Policy. 2005;4:717–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Webster DW. Cracking down on corrupt gun dealers in Chicago: Effects on the illicit gun market. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Public Health Association, San Francisco, November 2003.

  21. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. Crime Gun Trace Analysis Reports: The Illegal Youth Firearms Market in 27 Communities. Washington, District of Columbia: Department of the Treasury; February 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wintemute GJ. Ring of Fire: The Gun Makers of Southern California. Violence Prevention Research Program, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California; 1994.

  23. Wei WWS. Time Series Analysis: Univariate and Multivariate Methods. New York: Addison-Wesley; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Durbin J, Watson GS. Testing for serial correlation in least-squares regression: part I. Biometrika. 1950;37:409–428.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Durbin J, Watson GS. Testing for serial correlation in least-squares regression: part II. Biometrika. 1951;38:159–178.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welsch RE. Regression Diagnostics: Identification of Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: Wiley; 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jacobs JB. Can Gun Control Work? New York: Oxford University Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Webster DW, Freed LH, Frattaroli S, Wilson MH. How delinquent youth acquire guns: initial versus most recent gun acquisitions. J Urban Health. 2002;79:60–69.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cook PJ, Ludwig J, Venkatesh S, Braga AA. Underground gun markets. Working paper No. 11737, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, November 2005.

  30. Cook PJ, Molliconi S, Cole TB. Regulating gun markets. J Crim Law Criminol. 1995;86:59–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cook PJ, Ludwig J. Principles for effective gun policy. Fordham Law Rev. 2004;73:589–613.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Webster DW, Vernick JS, Hepburn LM. Relationship between licensing, registration and other gun sales laws and the source state of crime guns. Inj Prev. 2001;7:184–189.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pierce GL. Impact of illegal gun markets on use of guns in crime. Presented at the American Society of Criminology Annual Meeting, Toronto, November 17, 2005.

  34. Kotler P, Levy S. Demarketing, yes demarketing. Harvard Bus Rev. 1971;49(4):74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Bradford KD, Gundlach GT, Wilkie WL. Countermarketing and the courts: the case of marketing channels and firearms diversion. J Public Policy Mark. 2005;24:284–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gun store operator facing 7 charges. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. November 20, 1998; 6.

  37. Lewis RK, Paine-Andrews A, Fawcett SB, Francisco VT, Richter KP, Copple B, Copple JE. Evaluating the effects of a community coalition's efforts to reduce illegal sales of alcohol and tobacco products to minors. J Commun Health. 1996;21:429–436.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Rigotti NA, DiFranza JR, Chang Y, Tisdale T, Kemp B, Singer DE. The effect of enforcing tobacco-sales laws on adolescents' access to tobacco and smoking behavior. New Engl J Med. 1997;337:1044–1051.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Grube JW. Preventing the sales of alcohol to minors: results from a community trial. Addiction. 1997;92(suppl. 2):S251–S260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Scribner RA, Chohen DA. The effect of enforcement on merchant compliance with the minimum legal drinking age law. J Drug Issues. 2001;31:857–866.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Enhanced enforcement of laws to prevent alcohol sales to underage persons—New Hampshire, 1999–2004. Morb Mort Wkly Rep. 2004;53:452–454.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by grants from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, The Overbrook Foundation, and The Joyce Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. Webster.

Additional information

Webster, Vernick, and Bulzacchelli are with the Center for Gun Policy and Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Rm. 593, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Webster, D.W., Vernick, J.S. & Bulzacchelli, M.T. Effects of a Gun Dealer's Change in Sales Practices on the Supply of Guns to Criminals. JURH 83, 778–787 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9073-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-006-9073-2

Keywords

Navigation