Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sexual Mixing Patterns and Partner Characteristics of Black MSM in Massachusetts at Increased Risk for HIV Infection and Transmission

Journal of Urban Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Black men who have sex with men (MSM) are at increased risk for HIV infection in the United States compared to other MSM. The aim of this study was to investigate Black MSM’s sexual mixing patterns and partner characteristics in relation to sexual risk taking, as a possible explanation for this observed increase in HIV incidence. Between January and July 2008, 197 Black MSM were recruited via modified respondent-driven sampling and completed optional pretest and post-test HIV serological testing, counseling, and a demographic, behavioral, and psychosocial assessment battery. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression procedures were used to examine predictors of risky sex across partner types. Overall, 18% of the sample was HIV-infected; 50% reported unprotected intercourse with men, 30% with women, and 5% with transgender partners. Fifty-three percent identified as bisexual or straight, although all reported oral or anal sex with another man in the prior 12 months. Significant predictors of engaging in at least one episode of: (1) serodiscordant unprotected anal sex (UAS) with a male partner in the past 12 months: individuals at risk for social isolation (AOR = 4.23; p = 0.03), those with unstable housing (AOR = 4.19; p = 0.03), and those who used poppers at least weekly during sex (AOR = 5.90; p = 0.05); (2) UAS and/or unprotected vaginal intercourse with a female partner in the past 12 months: those with unstable housing (AOR = 4.85; p = 0.04), those who used cocaine at least weekly during sex (AOR = 16.78; p = 0.006), being HIV-infected (AOR = 0.07; p = 0.02), and feeling social norms favor condom use (AOR = 0.60; p = 0.05); (3) UAS with the participants’ most recent nonmain male sex partner: use of alcohol and drugs during last sex by participant (AOR = 4.04; p = 0.01), having sex with a Hispanic/Latino male (AOR = 2.71; p = 0.04) or a Black male (AOR = 0.50; p = 0.05) compared to a White male, and lower education (AOR = 1.31; p = 0.02). Findings suggest that sexual risk behaviors of Black MSM differ across partner type and by the characteristics of their sexual networks and that this subpopulation of MSM are at high risk for HIV acquisition and transmission. Effective prevention strategies need to address the distinct sexual and behavioral risk patterns presented by different sexual partnerships reported by Black MSM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, 2006. vol. 18, Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  2. U.S. Census Bureau. State and county quickfacts; 2006. Accessed on: October 1, 2008. Available at: http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html.

  3. Beatty LA, Wheeler D, Gaiter J. HIV prevention research for African Americans: current and future directions. J Black Psychol. 2004; 30: 40–58. doi:10.1177/0095798403259245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fullilove RE. African Americans, Health Disparities and HIV/AIDS: Recommendations for Confronting the Epidemic in Black America. New York, NY: National Minority AIDS Council; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hall HI, Byers RH, Ling Q, Espinoza L. Racial/ethnic and age disparities in HIV prevalence and disease progression among men who have sex with men in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2007; 97(6): 1060–1066. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2006.087551.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mays VM, Cochran SD, Zamudio A. HIV prevention research: are we meeting the needs of African American men who have sex with men? J Black Psychol. 2004; 30(1): 78–105. doi:10.1177/0095798403260265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Heckman TG, Kelly JA, Bogart LM, Kalichman SC, Rompa DJ. HIV risk differences between African-American and white men who have sex with men. J Natl Med Assoc. 1999; 91: 92–100.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Institute of Medicine. Hidden Epidemic: Confronting Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Malebranche DJ, Peterson JL, Fullilove RE, Stackhouse RW. Race and sexual identity: perceptions about medical culture and healthcare among black men who have sex with men. J Natl Med Assoc. 2004; 96(1): 97–107.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Millett GA, Peterson JL, Wolitski RJ, Stall R. Greater risk for HIV infection of black men who have sex with men: a critical literature review. Am J Public Health. 2006; 96: 1007–1019. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2005.066720.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Peterson JL, Coates TJ, Catania JA, et al. High-risk sexual behavior and condom use among gay and bisexual African-American men. Am J Public Health. 1992; 82: 1490–1494. doi:10.2105/AJPH.82.11.1490.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Millett GA, Flores SA, Peterson JL, Bakeman R. Explaining disparities in HIV infection among black and white men who have sex with men: a meta-analysis of HIV risk behaviors. AIDS. 2007; 21: 2083–2091. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282e9a64b.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bingham TA, Harawa NT, Johnson DF, Secura GM, MacKellar DA, Valleroy LA. The effect of partner characteristics on HIV infection among African American men who have sex with men in the Young Men’s Survey, Los Angeles, 1999–2000. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003; 15: 39–53. doi:10.1521/aeap.15.1.5.39.23613.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harawa NT, Greenland S, Bingham TA, et al. Associations of race/ethnicity with HIV prevalence and HIV-related behaviors among young men who have sex with men in 7 urban centers in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2004; 35: 526–536. doi:10.1097/00126334-200404150-00011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koblin BA, Husnik MJ, Colfax G, et al. Risk factors for HIV infection among men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2006; 20: 731–939. doi:10.1097/01.aids.0000216374.61442.55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malebranche DJ. Black men who have sex with men and the HIV epidemic: next steps for public health. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93(6): 862–865. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.6.862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sifakis F, Hylton JB, Flynn C, et al. Racial disparities in HIV incidence among young men who have sex with men: the Baltimore young men’s survey. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2007; 46: 343–348. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e31815724cc.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ford K. Social differences in partners of American adults: association with condom use and sexually transmitted infections. Can J Hum Sex. 2003; 12(3/4): 129–135.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Havanon N, Bennett A, Knodel J. Sexual networking in provincial Thailand. Stud Fam Plann. 1993; 24: 1–17. doi:10.2307/2939210.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Morris M, Zavisca J, Dean L. Social and sexual networks: their role in the spread of HIV/AIDS among young gay men. AIDS Educ Prev. 1995; 7: 24–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Service S, Blower SM. HIV transmission in sexual networks: an empirical analysis. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995; 260: 237–244. doi:10.1098/rspb.1995.0086.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Laumann EO, Youm Y. Racial/ethnic group differences in the prevalence of sexually transmitted diseases in the United States: a network explanation. Sex Transm Dis. 1999; 26(5): 250–261. doi:10.1097/00007435-199905000-00003.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Choi KH, Operanio D, Gregorich SE, Han L. Age and race mixing patterns of sexual partnerships among Asian men who have sex with men: implications for HIV transmission and prevention. AIDS Educ Prev. 2003; 15: 53–65. doi:10.1521/aeap.15.1.5.53.23609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Berry M, Raymond HF, MacFarland W. Same race and older partner selection may explain higher HIV prevalence among black men who have sex with men. AIDS. 2007; 21(17): 2349–2350. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e3282f12f41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling: a new approach to the study of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 1997; 44: 174–199. doi:10.1525/sp.1997.44.2.03x0221m.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mayer KH, Mimiaga MJ, VanDerwarker R, Goldhammer H, Bradford JB. Fenway Community Health’s model of integrated community-based LGBT care, education, and research. In: Meyer IH, Northridge ME, eds. The Health of Sexual Minorities. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, LLC; 2007: 693–715.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Mimiaga MJ, Goldhammer H, Belanoff C, Tetu AM, Mayer KH. Men who have sex with men: perceptions about sexual risk, HIV and sexually transmitted disease testing, and provider communication. Sex Transm Dis. 2007; 34: 113–119. doi:10.1097/01.olq.0000225327.13214.bf.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mimiaga MJ, Reisner SL, Tetu AM, et al. Psychosocial and behavioral predictors of partner notification after HIV and STI exposure and infection among MSM. AIDS Behav. In press.

  29. Heckathorn DD. Respondent-driven sampling II: deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Soc Probl. 2002; 49: 11–34. doi:10.1525/sp.2002.49.1.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Sanchez T, Finlayson T, Drake A, et al. Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) risk, prevention, and testing behaviors—United States, National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System: men who have sex with men, November 2003–April 2005. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2006; 55: 1–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984; 252: 1905–1907. doi:10.1001/jama.252.14.1905.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Knowlton R, McCusker J, Stoddard A, et al. The use of the CAGE questionnaire in a cohort of homosexually active men. J Stud Alcohol. 1994; 55: 692–694.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mayfield D, McLeod G, Hall P. The CAGE questionnaire: validation of a new alcoholism screening instrument. Am J Psychiatry. 1974; 131: 1121–1123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977; 1: 385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CES-D Scale. Bethesda, MD: Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Health; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lubben J, Blozik E, Gillmann G, et al. Performance of an abbreviated version of the Lubben social network scale among three European community-dwelling older adult populations. Gerontologist. 2006; 46: 503–513.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, Farley GK. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 2008; 52: 30–41. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zimet GD, Powell SS, Farley GK, Werkman S, Berkoff KA. Psychometric characteristics of the multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess. 1990; 55: 610–617. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa5503&4_17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Van de Ven P, Crawford J, Kippax S, et al. A scale of optimism–skepticism in the context of HIV treatments. AIDS Care. 2000;12:171–176. doi:10.1080/09540120050001841.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Catania JA, Coates TJ, Kegeles S. A test of the AIDS risk reduction model: psychosocial correlates of condom use in the AMEN Cohort Survey. Health Psychol. 1994; 13(6): 548–555. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.13.6.548.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Carey MP, Schroder KE. Development and psychometric evaluation of the brief HIV knowledge questionnaire. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002; 14(2): 172–182. doi:10.1521/aeap.14.2.172.23902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Jaworski BC, Carey MP. Development and psychometric evaluation of a self-administered questionnaire to measure knowledge of sexually transmitted diseases. AIDS Behav. 2007; 11(4): 557–574. doi:10.1007/s10461-006-9168-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. SAS Institute Inc. SAS® Version 9.1.3. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Afifi AA, Clark V, May S. Computer-Aided Multivariate Analysis. 4th edn. New York: Chapman and Hall; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Stall R, Mills TC, Williamson J, et al. Association of co-occurring psychosocial health problems and increased vulnerability to HIV/AIDS among urban men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health. 2003; 93: 939–942. doi:10.2105/AJPH.93.6.939.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Stall R, Paul JP, Greenwood G, et al. Alcohol use, drug use, and alcohol-related problems among men who have sex with men: the Urban Men’s Health Study. Addiction. 2001; 96: 1589–1601. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961115896.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Darbes LA, Lewis MA. HIV-specific social support predicts less sexual risk behavior in gay male couples. Health Psychol. 2005; 24(6): 617–622. doi:10.1037/0278-6133.24.6.617.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. O’Donnell L, Agronick G, San Doval, et al. Ethnic and gay community attachments and sexual risk behaviors among urban Latino young men who have sex with men. AIDS Educ Prev. 2002; 14(6): 457071. doi:10.1521/aeap.14.8.457.24109.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Peterson JL, Rothenberg R, Kraft JM, Beeker C, Trotter R. Perceived condom norms and HIV risks among social and sexual networks of young African American men who have sex with men. Health Educ Res. 2008; 24: 119–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Peterson JL, Folkman S, Bakeman R. Stress, coping, HIV status, psychosocial resources, and depressive mood in African American gay, bisexual, and heterosexual men. Am J Community Psychol. 1996; 24(4): 461–487. doi:10.1007/BF02506793.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Crosby RA, DiClemente RJ, Wingwood GM, et al. HIV/STD-protective benefits of living with mothers in perceived supportive families: a study of high-risk African American female teens. Prev Med. 2001; 33(3): 175–178. doi:10.1006/pmed.2001.0868.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Ennett ST, Bailey SL, Federman E. Social network characteristics associated with risky behaviors among runaway and homeless youth. J Health Soc Behav. 1999; 40: 63–78. doi:10.2307/2676379.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Gore-Felton C, Koopman C, Turner-Cobb JM, Duran R, Israelski D, Spiegel D. The influence of social support, coping and mood on sexual risk behavior among HIV-positive men and women. J Health Psychol. 2002; 7(6): 713–722. doi:10.1177/1359105302007006874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Heckman TG, Kelly JA, Somlai AM. Predictors of continued high-risk sexual behavior in a community sample of persons living with HIV/AIDS. AIDS Behav. 1998; 2(2): 127–135. doi:10.1023/A:1022194829791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Henrich CC, Brookmeyer KA, Shrier LA, Shahar G. Supportive relationships and sexual risk behavior in adolescence: an ecological–transactional approach. J Pediatr Psychol. 2006; 31(3): 286–297. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsj024.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. St. Lawrence JS, Brasfield TL, Jefferson KW, et al. Social support as a factor in African-American adolescents’ sexual risk behavior. J Adolesc Res. 1994; 9(3): 292–310. doi:10.1177/074355489493002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Clements K, Gleghorn A, Garcia D, Katz M, Marx R. A risk profile of street youth in northern California: implications for gender-specific human immunodeficiency virus prevention. J Adolesc Health. 1997; 20: 343–353. doi:10.1016/S1054-139X(97)00033-5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Halcon LL, Lifson AR. Prevalence and predictors of sexual risks among homeless youth. J Youth Adolesc. 2004; 33: 71–80. doi:10.1023/A:1027338514930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rotheram-Borus MJ, Koopman C, Haignere C, Davies M. Reducing HIV sexual risk behaviors among runaway adolescents. JAMA. 1991; 266: 1237–1241. doi:10.1001/jama.266.9.1237.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Rotheram-Borus MJ, Song J, Gwadz M, Lee M, Van Rossem R, Koopman C. Reductions in HIV risk among runaway youth. Prev Sci. 2003; 4: 173–187. doi:10.1023/A:1024697706033.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Diaz RM, Stall RD, Hoff C, Daigle D, Coates TJ. HIV risk among Latino gay men in the Southwestern United States. AIDS Educ Prev. 1996; 8: 415–429.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Hogg RS, Craib KJ, Willoughby B, Sestak B, Montaner JS, Schechter MT. Sociodemographic correlates for risk-taking behaviour among HIV seronegative homosexual men. Can J Public Health. 1993; 84: 423–426.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Hope VD, MacArthur C. Safer sex and social class: findings from a study of men using the ‘gay scene’ in the West Midlands Region of the United Kingdom. AIDS Care. 1998; 10: 81–88.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Janssen M, de Wit J, Stoebbe W, van Griensven F. Educational status and risk of HIV in young gay men. J Health Psychol. 2000; 5: 487–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Janssen M, de Wit J, Hospers HJ, van Griensven F. Educational status and young Dutch gay men’s beliefs about using condoms. AIDS Care. 2001; 13: 41–56. doi:10.1080/09540120020018170.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Kippax S, Crawford J, Rodden P, Noble J. Predictors of unprotected male-to-male anal intercourse with casual partners in a national sample. Aust J Public Health. 1995; 19: 132–138.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Rawstorne P, Fogarty A, Crawford J, et al. Differences between HIV-positive gay men who ‘frequently’, ‘sometimes’ or ‘never’ engage in unprotected anal intercourse with serononconcordant casual partners: positive Health Cohort, Australia. AIDS Care. 2007; 19(4): 514–522. doi:10.1080/09540120701214961.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Grulich A, Prestage GP, Kippax SC, Crawford JM, Van de Ven PG. HIV serostatus of sexual partners of HIV-positive and HIV-negative homosexual men in Sydney. AIDS. 1998; 12: 2508. letter.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Hoff CC, Stall R, Paul J, et al. Differences in sexual behavior among HIV discordant and concordant gay men in primary relationships. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Hum Retrovirol. 1997; 14: 72–78.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Van de Ven P, Rawstorne P, Treloar C, Richters J. HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis Sexually Transmissible Infections in Australia: Annual Report of Behaviour, 2004. Sydney, Australia: National Centre in HIV Social Research, University of New South Wales; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the following individuals who contributed time and energy to this project: Tom Barker, William Graves, Pam McMorrow, Brandon Perkovich, and Ashley Tetu.

This work was funded by the HIV/AIDS Bureau, Massachusetts Department of Public Health. Some of the investigator time on this project was support by grant number R03DA023393 from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (PI: M. Mimiaga). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew J. Mimiaga ScD, MPH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mimiaga, M.J., Reisner, S.L., Cranston, K. et al. Sexual Mixing Patterns and Partner Characteristics of Black MSM in Massachusetts at Increased Risk for HIV Infection and Transmission. J Urban Health 86, 602–623 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9363-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9363-6

Keywords

Navigation