Abstract
Persons named by a patient with tuberculosis (TB) are the focus of traditional TB contact investigations. However, patients who use illicit drugs are often reluctant to name contacts. Between January 2004 and May 2005, 18 isoniazid-resistant TB cases with matching Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotypes (spoligotypes) were reported in Miami; most patients frequented crack houses and did not name potentially infected contacts. We reviewed medical records and reinterviewed patients about contacts and locations frequented to describe transmission patterns and make recommendations to control TB in this population. Observed contacts were not named but were encountered at the same crack houses as the patients. Contacts were evaluated for latent TB infection with a tuberculosis skin test (TST). All 18 patients had pulmonary TB. Twelve (67%) reported crack use and 14 (78%) any illicit drug use. Of the 187 contacts evaluated, 91 (49%) were named, 16 (8%) attended a church reported by a patient, 61 (33%) used a dialysis center reported by a patient, and 19 (10%) were observed contacts at local crack houses. Compared to named contacts, observed contacts were eight times as likely to have positive TST results (relative risk = 7.8; 95% confidence interval = 3.8–16.1). Dialysis center and church contacts had no elevated risk of a positive TST result. Testing observed contacts may provide a higher yield than traditional name-based contact investigations for tuberculosis patients who use illicit drugs or frequent venues characterized by illicit drug use.
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Reported tuberculosis in the United States, 2007. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2008.
Reichman LB, Felton CP, Edsall JR. Drug dependence, a possible new risk factor for tuberculosis disease. Arch Intern Med. 1979; 139(3): 337-339. doi:10.1001/archinte.139.3.337.
Reichler MR, Etkind S, Taylor Z, Castro KG. Tuberculosis contact investigations. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003; 7(12 Suppl 3): S325-S327.
Malakmadze N, González IM, Oemig T, et al. Unsuspected recent transmission of tuberculosis among high-risk groups: implications of universal tuberculosis genotyping in its detection. Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 40(3): 366-373. doi:10.1086/427112.
Oeltmann JE, Oren E, Haddad MB, et al. Tuberculosis outbreak in marijuana users, Seattle, Washington, 2004. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006; 12(7): 1156-1159.
Fitzpatrick LK, Hardacker JA, Heirendt W, et al. A preventable outbreak of tuberculosis investigated through an intricate social network. Clin Infect Dis. 2001; 33(11): 1801-1806. doi:10.1086/323671.
Jereb J, Etkind SC, Joglar OT, Moore M, Taylor Z. Tuberculosis contact investigations: outcomes in selected areas of the United States, 1999. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003; 7(12 Suppl 3): S384-S390.
Sprinson JE, Flood J, Fan CS. Evaluation of tuberculosis contact investigations in California. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2003; 7(12 Suppl 3): S363-S368.
Deiss RG, Rodwell TC, Garfein RS. Tuberculosis and illicit drug use: review and update. Clin Infect Dis. 2009; 48(1): 72-82. doi:10.1086/594126.
Story A, Bothamley G, Hayward A. Crack cocaine and infectious tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008; 14(9): 1466-1469. doi:10.3201/eid1409.070654.
National Tuberculosis Controllers Association, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Guidelines for the investigation of contacts of persons with infectious tuberculosis. Recommendations from the National Tuberculosis Controllers Association and CDC. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2005; 54(RR-15): 1-47.
Acknowledgments
We thank Gail Grant-Burns, Al Forbes, Michael Frazier, Patrick Moonan, Maryam Haddad, Tom Navin, John Jereb, and Jim Cobb for their support during this investigation and review of the manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Asghar, R.J., Patlan, D.E., Miner, M.C. et al. Limited Utility of Name-Based Tuberculosis Contact Investigations among Persons Using Illicit Drugs: Results of an Outbreak Investigation. J Urban Health 86, 776–780 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9378-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-009-9378-z