Skip to main content
Log in

Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To explore colorectal cancer (CRC) screening knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and preferences among urban African Americans as a prelude to the development of culturally appropriate interventions to improve screening for this group.

DESIGN: Qualitative focus group study with assessment of CRC screening preferences.

SETTING: Community health center serving low-income African Americans.

PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-five self-identified African Americans over 40 years of age.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Transcripts were analyzed using an iterative coding process with consensus and triangulation on final thematic findings. Six major themes were identified: (1) Hope—a positive attitude toward screening, (2) Mistrust—distrust that the system or providers put patients first, (3) Fear—fear of cancer, the system, and of CRC screening procedures, (4) Fatalism—the belief that screening and treatment may be futile and surgery causes spread of cancer, (5) Accuracy—a preference for the most thorough and accurate test for CRC, and (6) Knowledge—lack of CRC knowledge and a desire for more information. The Fear and Knowledge themes were most frequently noted in transcript theme counts. The Hope and Accuracy themes were crucial moderators of the influence of all barriers. The largest number of participants preferred either colonoscopy (33%) or home fecal occult blood testing (26%).

CONCLUSIONS: Low-income African Americans are optimistic and hopeful about early CRC detection and believe that thorough and accurate CRC screening is valuable. Lack of CRC knowledge and fear are major barriers to screening for this population along with mistrust, and fatalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lag R, Eisner MP, Kosary CL, et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1973–1999. Bethesda, Md: National Cancer Institute; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cancer Facts and Figures—2002. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2002.

  3. Winawer SJ, Fletcher RH, Miller L. et al. Colorectal cancer screening: clinical guidelines and rationale. Gastroenterology. 1997;112:594–642.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota colon cancer control study. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:1365–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mandel JS, Church TR, Ederer F, Bond JH. Colorectal cancer mortality: effectiveness of biennial screening for fecal occult blood. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:434–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mandel JS, Church TR, Bond JH, et al. The effect of fecal occult-blood screening on the incidence of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1603–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Selby JV, Friedman GD, Quesenberry CP, Jr., Weiss NS. A case-control study of screening sigmoidoscopy and mortality from colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:653–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Atkin WS, Hart A, Edwards R, et al. Uptake, yield of neoplasia, and adverse effects of flexible sigmoidoscopy screening. Gut. 1998;42:560–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Newcomb PA, Norfleet RG, Storer BE, Surawicz TS, Marcus PM. Screening sigmoidoscopy and colorectal cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1992;84:1572–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. Colonoscopic polypectomy and the incidence of colorectal cancer. Gut. 2001;48:753–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Ho MN, et al. Prevention of colorectal cancer by colonoscopic polypectomy. The National Polyp Study Workgroup. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:1977–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Muller AD, Sonnenberg A. Prevention of colorectal cancer by flexible endoscopy and polypectomy. A case-control study of 32,702 veterans. Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:904–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, von Eschenbach AC, et al. American cancer society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2002;52:8–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pignone M, Rich M, Teutsch SM, Berg AO, Lohr KN. Screening for colorectal cancer in adults at average risk: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:132–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Coughlin SS, Thompson TD, Seeff L, Richards T, Stallings F. Breast, cervical, and colorectal carcinoma screening in a demographically defined region of the southern U.S.. Cancer. 2002;92:2211–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Holmes-Rovner M, Williams GA, Hoppough S, Quillan L, Butler R, Given CW. Colorectal cancer screening barriers in persons with low income. Cancer Pract. 2002;10:240–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nadel MR, Blackman DK, Shapiro JA, Seeff LC. Are people being screened for colorectal cancer as recommended? Results from the National Health Interview Survey. Prev Med. 2002;35:199–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Breen N, Wagener DK, Brown ML, Davis WW, Ballard-Barbash R. Progress in cancer screening over a decade: results of cancer screening from the 1987, 1992, and 1998 National Health Interview Surveys. J Natl Cancer Inst. Nov 21 2001;93:1704–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1999. Survey Data. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington, DC: United States Department of Health and Human Services; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Beeker C, Kraft JM, Southwell BG, Jorgensen CM. Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: qualitative research findings and implications for intervention. J Community Health. 2000;25:263–78.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Brenes GA, Paskett ED. Predictors of stage of adoption for colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med. 2000;31:410–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Paskett ED, Rushing J, D’Agostino R, Jr., Tatum C, Velez R. Cancer screening behaviors of low-income women: the impact of race. Womens Health. 1997;3:203–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Parker SL, Davis KJ, Wingo PA, Ries LA, Heath CW, Jr. Cancer statistics by race and ethnicity. CA Cancer J Clin. 1998;48:31–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Freeman HP, Alshafie TA. Colorectal carcinoma in poor blacks. Cancer. 2002;94:2327–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Mandelblatt J, Andrews H, Kao R, Wallace R, Kerner J. The late-stage diagnosis of colorectal cancer: demographic and socioeconomic factors. Am J Public Health. 1996;86:1794–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bejes C, Marvel MK. Attempting the improbable: offering colorectal cancer screening to all appropriate patients. Fam Pract Res J. 1992;12:83–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Myers RE, Ross EA, Wolf TA, Balshem A, Jepson C, Millner L. Behavioral interventions to increase adherence in colorectal cancer screening. Med Care. 1991;29:1039–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Arveux P, Durand G, Milan C, et al. Views of a general population on mass screening for colorectal cancer: the burgundy study. Prev Med. 1992;21:574–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Hunter W, Farmer A, Mant D, Verne J, Northover J, Fitzpatrick R. The effect of self-administered faecal occult blood tests on compliance with screening for colorectal cancer: results of a survey of those invited. Fam Pract. 1991;8:367–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Powe BD. Fatalism among elderly African Americans. Effects on colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Nurs. 1995;18:385–92.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Hoogewerf PE, Hislop TG, Morrison BJ, Burns SD, Sizto R. Health belief and compliance with screening for fecal occult blood. Soc Sci Med. 1990;30:721–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vernon SW, Acquavella JF, Yarborough CM, Hughes JI, Thar WE. Reasons for participation and nonparticipation in a colorectal cancer screening program for a cohort of high risk polypropylene workers. J Occup Med. 1990;32:46–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Vernon SW, Gilstrap EL, Jackson GL, Hughes JI. An intervention to increase participation in a work site cancer screening program. Health Values. 1992;16:3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  34. James AS, Campbell MK, Hudson MA. Perceived barriers and benefits to colon cancer screening among African Americans in North Carolina: how does perception relate to screening behavior? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002;11:529–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lipkus IM, Lyna PR, Rimer BK. Colorectal cancer risk perceptions and screening intentions in a minority population. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:492–500.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Lipkus IM, Rimer BK, Lyna PR, Pradhan AA, Conaway M, Woods-Powell CT. Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center. J Community Health. 1996;21:409–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Doukas DJ, Fetters MD, Coyne JC, McCullough LB. How men view genetic testing for prostate cancer risk: findings from focus groups. Clin Genet. 2000;58:169–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. McFall SL, Hamm RM. Interpretation of prostate cancer screening events and outcomes: a focus group study. Patient Educ Couns. 2003;49:207–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Phillips JM, Cohen MZ, Moses G. Breast cancer screening and African American women: fear, fatalism, and silence. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1999;26:561–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Bailey EJ, Erwin DO, Belin P. Using cultural beliefs and patterns to improve mammography utilization among African-American women: the witness project. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:136–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Brouse CH, Basch CE, Wolf RL, Shmukler C, Neugut AI, Shea S. Barriers to colorectal cancer screening with fecal occult blood testing in a predominantly minority urban population: a qualitative study. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:1268–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Holmes-Rovner M, Williams GA, Hoppough S, Quillan L, Butler R, Given CW. Colorectal cancer screening barriers in persons with low income. Cancer Pract. 2002;10:240–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Willms DG, Best JA, Taylor DW, et al. A systematic approach for using qualitative methods in primary prevention research. Med Anthropol Q. 1990;4:391–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Pope C, Mays N. Qualitative methods in health and health services research. In: Mays N, Pope C, eds. Qualitative Research in Health Care. London: BMJ; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Basch CE. Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education. Health Educ Q. 1987;14:411–48.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320:50–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Educ Q. 1984;11:1–47.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Miles M, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Data Anaysis: A Source Book of New Methods. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Books; 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Price JH. Perceptions of colorectal cancer in a socioeconomically disadvantaged population. J Community Health. 1993;18:347–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Bowen D, Hickman KM, Powers D. Importance of psychological variables in understanding risk perceptions and breast cancer screening of African American women. Womens Health. 1997;3:227–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Crump SR, Mayberry RM, Taylor BD, Barefield KP, Thomas PE. Factors related to noncompliance with screening mammogram appointments among low-income African-American women. J Natl Med Assoc. 2000;92:237–46.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Zhu S-H, Tedeschi GJ, Anderson CM, Pierce JP. Telephone counseling for smoking cessation: whats in a call? J Couns Dev. 1996;75:93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Kinney AY, Emery G, Dudley WN, Croyle RT. Screening behaviors among African American women at high risk for breast cancer: do beliefs about god matter? Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002;29:835–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Allen Greiner MD, MPH.

Additional information

The authors have no conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, to declare for this article or this research.

See editorial by Walsh, p. 1068

This study was supported by a Mentored-Clinician Scientist Career Development Award from the University of Kansas Medical Center Research Institute and an American Cancer Society Career Development Award for Primary Care Clinicians (CCCDA-02-223-01), K.A.G.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Greiner, K.A., Born, W., Nollen, N. et al. Knowledge and perceptions of colorectal cancer screening among urban African Americans. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 977–983 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-005-0244-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-005-0244-8

Key Words

Navigation