Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impact of Student Ethnicity and Primary Childhood Language on Communication Skill Assessment in a Clinical Performance Examination

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Clinical performance examinations (CPX) with standardized patients (SPs) have become a preferred method to assess communication skills in US medical schools. Little is known about how trainees’ backgrounds impact CPX performance.

Objective

The objective of this paper is to examine the impact of student ethnicity, primary childhood language, and experience of diversity on the communication scores of a high-stakes CPX using SPs.

Design

This research was designed as an observational study.

Participants

The participants of this study were third-year medical students at one US medical school.

Measurements and Main Results

The measurements used in this study were CPX scores from mandatory exam, student demographics and experience with diversity measured by self-report on a survey, and Medical College Admission Test (MCAT) and United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) scores. A total of 135 students participated. Asian and black students scored lower than white students on the communication portion of the CPX by approximately half a standard deviation (Asian, 67.4%; black, 64.4%; white, 69.4%, p < .05). There were no differences by ethnicity on history/physical exam scores. Multivariate analysis controlling for MCAT verbal scores reduced ethnic differences in communication scores (Asian–white mean differences = 1.95, p = 0.02), but Asian–white differences were eliminated only after sequential models included primary childhood language (difference = 0.57, p = 0.6).

Conclusions

Even after controlling for English language knowledge as measured in MCAT verbal scores, speaking a primary childhood language other than English is associated with lower CPX communication scores for Asian students. While poorer communication skills cannot be ruled out, SP exams may contain measurement bias associated with differences in childhood language or culture. Caution is indicated when interpreting CPX communication scores among diverse examinees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Irby DM, Wilkerson L. Educational innovations in academic medicine and environmental trends. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18(5):370–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pena Dolhun E, Munoz C, Grumbach K. Cross-cultural education in U.S. medical schools: development of an assessment tool. Acad Med. 2003;78(6):615–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002;287(2):226–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hauer KE, Hodgson CS, Kerr KM, et al. A national study of medical student clinical skills assessment. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 suppl):25S–9S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Smedley BD, Stith AY, Nelson AR, eds. Unequal treatment: confronting racial and ethnic disparities in health care. Committee on Understanding and Eliminating Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care, Institute of Medicine. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adams D. Cultural competency now law in New Jersey. http://www.amednews.com. 2005.

  7. Williams RG. Have standardized patient examinations stood the test of time and experience? Teach Learn Med. 2004;16(2):215–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wass V, Roberts C, Hoogenboom R, et al. Effect of ethnicity on performance in a final objective structured clinical examination: qualitative and quantitative study. BMJ. 2003;326(7393):800–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Swartz MH, Colliver JA, Robbs RS. The interaction of examinee’s ethnicity and standardized patient’s ethnicity: an extended analysis. Acad Med. 2001;76(10 suppl):96S–8S.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Colliver JA, Swartz MH. Assessing clinical performance with standardized patients. JAMA. 1997;278(9):790–1.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Zanten M, Boulet JR, McKinley DW. Correlates of performance of the ECFMG clinical skills assessment: influences of candidate characteristics on performance. Acad Med. 2003;78(10 suppl):72S–4S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. van Zanten M, Boulet JR, McKinley DW. The influence of ethnicity on patient satisfaction in a standardized patient assessment. Acad Med. 2004;79(10 suppl):15S–7S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Rees C, Sheard C. The relationship between medical students’ attitudes towards communication skills learning and their demographic and education-related characteristics. Med Educ. 2002;36(11):1017–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lang F, McCord R, Harvill L, et al. Communication assessment using the common ground instrument: psychometric properties. Fam Med. 2004;36(3):189–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heine N, Garman K, Wallace P, et al. An analysis of standardised patient checklist errors and their effect on student scores. Med Educ. 2003;37(2):99–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Brennan RL. Generalizability theory. New York: Springer; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yedidia MJ, Gillespie CC, Kachur E, et al. Effect of communications training on medical student performance. JAMA. 2003;290(9):1157–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Donnon T, Paolucci EO, Violato C. The predictive validity of the MCAT for medical school performance and medical board licensing examinations: a meta-analysis of the published research. Acad Med. 2007;82(1):100–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. AAMC. http://www.aamc.org/students/mcat/examineedata/combined01.pdf. Accessed July 2, 2006.

  20. Perloff RM, Bonder B, Ray GB, et al. Doctor–patient communication, cultural competence, and minority health: theoretical and empirical perspectives. Am Behav Sci. 2006;49(6):835–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, et al. Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):907–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saba GW, Wong ST, Schillinger D, et al. Shared decision making and the experience of partnership in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2006;4(1):54–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Henry SG. A piece of my mind. Playing doctor. JAMA. 2005;294(17):2138–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Rose M, Wilkerson L. Widening the lens on standardized patient assessment: what the encounter can reveal about the development of clinical competence. Acad Med. 2001;76(8):856–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Dr. Fernandez’ efforts were supported by NIH K23 RR018324-01. Ms. Wang was partially supported by HRSA grant D54HP03400. We gratefully acknowledge input from the USCF ESCape WIP group and Pat O’Sullivan, Ph.D., and thank Eric Vittinghoff, Ph.D., for statistical advice and Kathleen Kerr for editing.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alicia Fernandez MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernandez, A., Wang, F., Braveman, M. et al. Impact of Student Ethnicity and Primary Childhood Language on Communication Skill Assessment in a Clinical Performance Examination. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 1155–1160 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0250-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0250-0

KEY WORDS

Navigation