Abstract
Context
In primary, acute-care visits, patients frequently present with more than 1 concern. Various visit factors prevent additional concerns from being articulated and addressed.
Objective
To test an intervention to reduce patients’ unmet concerns.
Design
Cross-sectional comparison of 2 experimental questions, with videotaping of office visits and pre and postvisit surveys.
Setting
Twenty outpatient offices of community-based physicians equally divided between Los Angeles County and a midsized town in Pennsylvania.
Participants
A volunteer sample of 20 family physicians (participation rate = 80%) and 224 patients approached consecutively within physicians (participation rate = 73%; approximately 11 participating for each enrolled physician) seeking care for an acute condition.
Intervention
After seeing 4 nonintervention patients, physicians were randomly assigned to solicit additional concerns by asking 1 of the following 2 questions after patients presented their chief concern: “Is there anything else you want to address in the visit today?” (ANY condition) and “Is there something else you want to address in the visit today?” (SOME condition).
Main Outcome Measures
Patients’ unmet concerns: concerns listed on previsit surveys but not addressed during visits, visit time, unanticipated concerns: concerns that were addressed during the visit but not listed on previsit surveys.
Results
Relative to nonintervention cases, the implemented SOME intervention eliminated 78% of unmet concerns (odds ratio (OR) = .154, p = .001). The ANY intervention could not be significantly distinguished from the control condition (p = .122). Neither intervention affected visit length, or patients’; expression of unanticipated concerns not listed in previsit surveys.
Conclusions
Patients’ unmet concerns can be dramatically reduced by a simple inquiry framed in the SOME form. Both the learning and implementation of the intervention require very little time.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Stewart M, Brown J, Levenstein J, McCracken E, McWhinney IR. The patient-centered clinical method, 3: changes in residents’ performance over two months of training. Fam Prac. 1986;3:164–7.
Kaplan SH, Gandek B, Greenfield S, Rogers W, Ware JE. Patient and visit characteristics related to physicians’ participatory decision making style: results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Medical Care. 1995;33:1176–87.
Beckman H, Frankel R. The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Ann Intern Med. 1984;101:692–6.
Marvel MK, Epstein RM, Flowers K, Beckman HB. Soliciting the patient’s agenda: Have we improved? JAMA. 1999;281(3):283–7.
Callahan E, Stange K, Zyzanski S, Goodwin M, Flocke S, Bertakis K. Physician-elder interaction in community family practice. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004;17(1):19–25.
White J, Levinson W, Roter D. “Oh, by the way ...”: the closing moments of the medical visit. J Gen Intern Med. 1994;9(1):24–8.
White JC, Rosson C, Christensen J, Hart R, Levinson W. Wrapping things up: a qualitative analysis of the closing moments of the medical visit. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:155–65.
Lipkin M, Putnam S, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education And Research. New York: Springer; 1995.
Cohen-Cole SA. The medical interview: The three function approach. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1991.
Lang F, McCord RS. Agenda setting in the patient-physician relationship. JAMA. 1999;282:942.
Lipkin M, Frankel R, Beckman H, Charon R, Fein O. Performing the interview. In: Lipkin M, Putnam S, Lazare A, eds. The Medical Interview: Clinical Care, Education and Research. New York: Springer; 1995:65–82.
Seidel HM, Ball JW, Dains JE, Benedict GW. Mosby’s guide to physical examination. 3rd edn. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1995.
Swartz MH. Textbook of Physical Diagnosis: History and Examination. 4th edn. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders; 1998.
Schuman H, Presser S. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Questions Form, Wording and Context. Orlando FL: Academic; 1981.
Wellman FL. The Art of Cross-Examination. New York: Touchstone; 1997.
Loftus E. Eyewitness Testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.
Clayman S, Heritage J. The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002.
Boyd E, Heritage J. Taking the patient’s medical history: questioning during comprehensive history taking. In: Heritage J, Maynard D, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
Bolinger D. Interrogative Structures of American English. University, Alabama: University of Alabama Press; 1957.
Borkin A. Polarity items in questions. Chicago Linguistic Society. 1971;7:53–62.
Horn LR. Some Aspects of Negation. In: Greenberg JH, Ferguson CA, Moravscik EA, eds. Universals of Human Language, Vol.4: Syntax. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press; 1978:127–210.
Graubard BI, Korn EL. Predictive margins with survey data. Biometrics. 1999;55(2):652–9.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley; 1989.
StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 9.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation; 2005.
Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56:645–6.
White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica. 1980;48:817–30.
Williams RL. A note on robust variance estimation for cluster-correlated data. Biometrics. 2000;56:645–6.
Cegala D, Broz L. Physician communication skills training: a review of theoretical backgrounds, objectives and skills. Med Educ. 2002;36:1004–6.
Ihler E. Patient-physician communication. JAMA. 2003;289:92.
Baile W, Lenzi R, Kudelka A, et al. Improving physician-patient communication in cancer care: outcome of a workshop for oncologists. J Cancer Educ. 1997;12:166–73.
Stein T, Kwan J. Thriving in a busy practice: physician-patient communication training. J Eff Clin Prac. 1999;2:63–70.
Joos SK, Hickam DH, Gordon GH, Baker LH. Effects of a physician communication intervention on patient care outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11(3):147–55.
Street RL, Gordon HS, Ward MM, Krupat E, Kravitz RL. Patient participation in medical consultations: why some patients are more involved than others. Medical Care. 2005;43(10):960–9.
Cassell E. Talking with Patients, Volume 2: Clinical Technique. Cambridge MA: MIT; 1985.
Heritage J, Maynard DW, eds. Communication in Medical Care: Interactions between Primary Care Physicians and Patients. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2006.
Stivers T. Prescribing Under Pressure: Parent-Physician Conversations and Antibiotics. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Acknowledgments
Funding for this project was provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Grant no. R01 HS13343.
The authors wish to thank Jerome Hoffman MD for his assistance with the training video, and Iris Halldorsdottir, Erika Lamoureaux and Seung-Hee Lee for their assistance in data analysis. Marc Elliott is supported in part by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC U48/DP000056). The contents of the publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
John Heritage had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Conflicts of Interest
No author has a potential or actual financial conflict of interest regarding the research reported in this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heritage, J., Robinson, J.D., Elliott, M.N. et al. Reducing Patients’ Unmet Concerns in Primary Care: the Difference One Word Can Make. J GEN INTERN MED 22, 1429–1433 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0279-0