Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Academic Physicians Use Placebos in Clinical Practice and Believe in the Mind–Body Connection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The placebo and the placebo effect are often investigated in the context of clinical trials. Little data exist on the use of placebos in the course of routine health care.

Objective

The aim of this study is to describe a group of academic physicians’ use of placebos and their knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about placebos and the placebo effect.

Design

A 16-question anonymous web-based survey of physicians from Internal Medicine departments of 3 Chicago-area medical schools was used.

Results

There were 231/466 (50%) physicians who responded; of these, 45% reported they had used a placebo in clinical practice. The most common reasons for placebo use were to calm the patient and as supplemental treatment. Physicians did not widely agree on the definition of a placebo and had a variety of explanations for its mechanism of action. Ninety-six percent of the respondents believed that placebos can have therapeutic effects, and up to 40% of the physicians reported that placebos could benefit patients physiologically for certain health problems. Only 12% of the respondents said that placebo use in routine medical care should be categorically prohibited. Regarding “placebo-like” treatment, 48% of respondents reported giving at least 1 type of treatment in a situation where there was no evidence of clinical efficacy.

Conclusion

Nearly half of the respondents use placebos in clinical practice and most believe in the mind–body connection. The results of this study, based on retrospective self-reported behavior, are subject to recall bias and may not be representative of American physicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benedetti F, Amanzio M. The neurobiology of placebo analgesia: from endogenous opioids to cholecystokinin. Prog Neurobiol. 1997;52(2):109–25.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Benson H. Timeless healing: the power and biology of belief. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berger JT. Placebo medication use in patient care: a survey of medical interns. West J Med. 1999;170:93–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brody H. Placebos and the philosophy of medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1980.

  5. Ernst E, Abbot NC. Placebos in clinical practice: results of a survey of nurses. Perfusion. 1997;10:128–30.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goldberg RJ, Leigh H, Quinlan D. The current status of placebo in hospital practice. Gen Hosp Psych. 1979;1(3):196–201.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goodwin JS, Goodwin JM, Vogel AV. Knowledge and use of placebos by house officers and nurses. Ann Intern Med. 1979;91(1):106–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gray G, Flynn P. A survey of placebo use in a general hospital. Gen Hosp Psych. 1981;3(3):199–203.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bok S. Ethical issues in use of placebo in medical practice and clinical trials. In: Guess HA, Kleinman A, Kusek JW, Engel LW, eds. The science of the placebo: toward an interdisciplinary research agenda. London: BMG Books; 2002, pp. 53–74.

  10. Harrington A. “Seeing” the placebo effect: historical legacies and present opportunities. In: Guess HA, Kleinman A, Kusek JW, Engel LW, eds. The science of the placebo: toward an interdisciplinary research agenda. London: BMJ Books; 2002:35–53.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hofling CK. The place of placebos in medical practice. GP. 1955;11(6):103–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hrobjartsson A, Gotzsche PC. Is the placebo powerless? An analysis of clinical trials comparing placebo with no treatment. N Engl J Med. 2001;344(21):1594–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hrobjartsson A, Norup M. The use of placebo interventions in medical practice—a national questionnaire survey of Danish clinicians. Eval Health Prof. 2003;26(2):153–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moerman D. Explanatory mechanisms for placebo effects: cultural influences and the meaning response. In: Guess HA, Kleinman A, Kusek JW, Engel LW, eds. The science of the placebo: toward an interdisciplinary research agenda. London: BMJ Books; 2002:77–108.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Moerman D, Jonas W. Deconstructing the placebo effect and finding the meaning response. Ann Intern Med. 2002;136(6):471–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nitzan U, Lichtenberg P. Questionnaire survey on use of placebo. Br Med J. 2004;329(7472):944–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Perseus web-based survey solutions. Available at http://www.perseus.com.

Further READING

  1. Brown WA. The placebo effect. Sci Am. 1998;278:68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harrington A, eds. The placebo effect: an interdisciplinary exploration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1997.

  3. Kendler KS. A psychiatric dialogue on the mind–body problem. Journal of American Psychiatry. 2001;158(7):989–1000.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lynoe N, Mattsson B, Sandlund M. The attitudes of patients and physicians towards placebo treatment—a comparative study. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36(6):767–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shapiro AK, Struening EL. The use of placebos: A study of ethics and physician attitudes. Psychiatr Med. 1973;4:17–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Thomson RJ, Buchanan WJ. Placebos and general practice: attitudes to, and the use of, the placebo effect. NZ Med J. 1982;95(712):492–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Many thanks to Sinan Kermen, Sandy Cook, Sandy Smith, and Jamie Cohen-Cole for their support.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA

    Rachel Sherman & John Hickner MD, MSc

Authors
  1. Rachel Sherman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. John Hickner MD, MSc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Sherman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sherman, R., Hickner, J. Academic Physicians Use Placebos in Clinical Practice and Believe in the Mind–Body Connection. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 7–10 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0332-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0332-z

KEY WORDS

Search

Navigation