Skip to main content
Log in

Informing Men about Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Education Materials

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Patient education materials can assist patient decision making on prostate cancer screening.

Objective

To explore the effectiveness of presenting health information on prostate cancer screening using video, internet, and written interventions on patient decision making, attitudes, knowledge, and screening interest.

Design

Randomized controlled trial.

Participants

A total of 161 men aged over 45, who had never been screened for prostate cancer, were randomized to receive information on prostate cancer screening.

Measurements

Participants were assessed at baseline and 1-week postintervention for decisional conflict, screening interest, knowledge, anxiety, and decision-making preference.

Results

A total of 156 men were followed-up at 1-week postintervention. There was no statistical, or clinical, difference in mean change in decisional conflict scores between the 3 intervention groups (video vs internet −0.06 [95% CI −0.24 to 0.12]; video vs pamphlet 0.04 [95%CI −0.15 to 0.22]; internet vs pamphlet 0.10 [95%CI −0.09 to 0.28]). There was also no statistically significant difference in mean knowledge, anxiety, decision-making preference, and screening interest between the 3 intervention groups.

Conclusion

Results from this study indicate that there are no clinically significant differences in decisional conflict when men are presented health information on prostate cancer screening via video, written materials, or the internet. Given the equivalence of the 3 methods, other factors need to be considered in deciding which method to use. Health professionals should provide patient health education materials via a method that is most convenient to the patient and their preferred learning style.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Parkin D, Bray F, Devesa S. Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture. Eur J Cancer. 2001;37:S4–S66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Frankel S, Smith G, Donovan J, Neal D. Screening for prostate cancer. Lancet. 2003;361:1122–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ilic D, O’Connor D, Green S, Wilt T. Screening for prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 3, 2006.

  4. Eysenbach G, Jadad A. Evidence-based patient choice and consumer health informatics in the internet age. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3:e19.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Connor A, Rostom A, Fiset V, et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J. 1999;319:731–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. O’Connor A. Decisional conflict scale. 4th Edition, 1999. Available at; http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_DecConflict2006.pdf. Accessed July 4, 2007.

  7. Ilic D, Risbridger G, Green S. The informed man: attitudes and information needs on prostate cancer screening. Journal of Men’s Health and Gender. 2005;2:414–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ziebland S, Chapple A, Dumelow C, Evans J, Prinjha S, Rozmovits L. How the internet affects patients’ experience of cancer: a qualitative study. Br Med J. 2004;328:564–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flood A, Wennberg J, Nease R, Fowler F, Ding J, Hynes L. The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:342–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Frosch D, Kaplan R, Felitti V. Evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16:391–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Frosch D, Kaplan R, Felitti V. A randomised controlled trial comparing internet and video to facilitate patient education for men considering the prostate specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 2003;18:781–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gattellari M, Ward J. Does evidence-based information about screening for prostate cancer enhance consumer decision-making? A randomized controlled trial. J Med Screen. 2003;10:27–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gattellari M, Ward J. A community-based randomized controlled trial of three different educational resources for men about prostate cancer screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2005;57:168–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Partin M, Nelson D, Radosevich D, et al. Randomized trial examining the effect of two prostate cancer screening educational interventions on patient knowledge, preferences and behaviors. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:835–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ruthman J, Ferrans C. Efficacy of a video for teaching patients about prostate cancer screening and treatment. Am J Health Promot. 2004;18:292–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Volk R, Cass A, Spann S. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:333–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schapira M, Van Ruswyk J. The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision—aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. J Fam Pract. 2000;49:418–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Davison J, Kirk P, Degner L, Hassard T. Information and patient participation in screening for prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1999;37:255–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wilt T, Paul J, Murdoch M, Nelson D, Nugent S, Rubins H. Educating men about prostate cancer screening. A randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:278–86.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schapira M, Meade C, Nattinger A. Enhanced decision-making: the use of a videotape decision—aid for patients with prostate cancer. Patient Educ Couns. 1997;30:119–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Tate D, Wing R, Winett R. Using Internet technology to deliver a behavioral weight loss program. JAMA. 2001;285:1172–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Christensen H, Griffiths K, Jorm A. Delivering interventions for depression by using the internet: randomised controlled trial. Br Med J. 2004;328:265–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Scherrer-Bannerman A, Fofonoff D, Minshall D, et al. Web-based education and support for patients on the cardiac surgery waiting list. J Telemed Telecare. 2000;6:s72–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. O’Connor A. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Mak. 1995;15:25–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Marteau T, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventor. Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31:301–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Degner L, Sloan J. Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:941–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Murray E, Davis H, Tai S, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A. Randomized controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on benign prostatic hypertrophy in primary care. Br Med J. 2001;323:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wei L, Zhang J. Analysis of data with imbalance in the baseline outcome variable for randomized clinical trials. Drug Inf J. 2001;35:1201–14.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Scott S, Goldberg M, Mayo N. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:45–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Murray E, Burns J, See Tai S, Lai R, Nazareth I. Interactive health communication applications for people with chronic disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Issue 4, 2005.

Download references

Acknowledgments

A portion of the results from this manuscript was presented at the 2nd Asia-Pacific Forum on Andrology, October 27, 2006, Shanghai, China. This work was funded by internal funding from the Monash Institute of Health Services Research.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dragan Ilic PhD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ilic, D., Egberts, K., McKenzie, J.E. et al. Informing Men about Prostate Cancer Screening: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Patient Education Materials. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 466–471 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0466-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0466-z

KEY WORDS

Navigation