Skip to main content
Log in

Sources of U.S. Physician Income: The Contribution of Government Payments to the Specialist–Generalist Income Gap

  • Report
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Physician income varies threefold among specialties. Lower incomes have produced shortages in primary care fields.

Objective

To investigate the impact of government policy on generating income differentials among specialties.

Design and Participants

Cross-sectional analysis of the 2004 MEPS.

Measurements

For outpatient care, total payments made to 27 different types of specialists from five types of payers: Medicare, Medicaid, other government (the Veterans Administration and other state and local programs), private insurance, and out-of-pocket payments. For inpatient care, aggregate (i.e., all-specialty) inpatient physician reimbursement from the five payers.

Results

In 2004, physicians derived 78.6% of their practice income ($149,684 million, 95% CI, $140,784 million—$158,584 million) from outpatient sources and 21.4% of their income ($40,782 million, 95% CI, $36,839 million—$44,724 million) from inpatient sources. Government payers accounted for 32.7% of total physician income. Four specialties derived > 50% of their outpatient income from public sources, including both the lowest and highest paid specialties (geriatrics and hematology/oncology, respectively).

Conclusions

Inter-specialty income differences result, in part, from government decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

References

  1. Campbell RJ, Ramirez AM, Perez K, Roetzheim RG. Cervical cancer rates and the supply of primary care physicians in Florida. Fam Med. 2003;35(1):60–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Franks P, Fiscella K. Primary care physicians and specialists as personal physicians. Health care expenditures and mortality experience. J Fam Pract. 1998;47(2):105–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gulliford MC. Availability of primary care doctors and population health in England: is there an association? J Public Health Med. 2002;24(4):252–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jarman B, Gault S, Alves B, et al. Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data. Br Med J (Clinical Research Ed.). 1999;318(7197):1515–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Malley AS, Forrest CB, Politzer RM, Wulu JT, Shi L. Health center trends, 1994–2001: what do they portend for the federal growth initiative? Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24(2):465–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shi L, Starfield B, Kennedy B, Kawachi I. Income inequality, primary care, and health indicators. J Fam Pract. 1999;48(4):275–84.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Shi L, Macinko J, Starfield B, Politzer R, Wulu J, Xu J. Primary care, social inequalities, and all-cause, heart disease, and cancer mortality in US counties, 1990. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(4):674–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Shi L, Macinko J, Starfield B, Politzer R, Xu J. Primary care, race, and mortality in US states. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(1):65–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baicker K, Chandra A. Medicare spending, the physician workforce, and beneficiaries’ quality of care. Health Affairs. 2004;Suppl Web Exclusives:W184–97.

  10. Mark DH, Gottlieb MS, Zellner BB, Chetty VK, Midtling JE. Medicare costs in urban areas and the supply of primary care physicians. J Fam Pract. 1996;43(1):33–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 2005;83(3):457–502.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Welch WP, Miller ME, Welch HG, Fisher ES, Wennberg JE. Geographic variation in expenditures for physicians' services in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(9):621–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Starfield B, Shi L. Policy relevant determinants of health: an international perspective. Health Policy. 2002;60(3):201–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bodenheimer T. Primary care-will it survive? N Engl J Med. 2006;355(9):861–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Berenson A. Sending back the doctor’s bill. The New York Times 2007 July 29;3.

  16. American College of Physicians. The impending collapse of primary care medicine and its implications in the state of the nation’s health care. A public policy report of the American College of Physicians, Philadelphia: January 30, 2006. Available at http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/events/state_of_healthcare/statehc06_1.pdf Accessed March 31, 2008.

  17. Bodenheimer T, Berenson RA, Rudolf P. The primary care-specialty income gap: why it matters. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(4):301–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Woo B. Primary care-the best job in medicine?. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(9):864–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maxwell S, Zuckerman S, Berenson RA. Use of physicians' services under Medicare's resource-based payments. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(18):1853–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen JW, Monheit AC, Beauregard KM, et al. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national health information resource. Inquiry. 1996;33(4):373–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Medical Group Management Association, Englewood, Colorado, December 2005.

  22. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, et al. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 1: the content, quality, and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(4):273–287.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. OECD Health Data 2004: A Comparative Analysis of 30 Countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development; 2004.

  24. Guyatt G, Devereaux PJ, Lexchin J, et al.. A systematic review of studies comparing health outcomes in Canada and the United States. Open Medicine. 2007;1(1):27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wassenaar JD, Thran SL, eds. Physician Socioeconomic Statistics. 2000–2002 ed. Chicago, Illinois: American Medical Association; 2001.

  26. Ginsburg PB, Berenson RA. Revising Medicare's physician fee schedule-much activity, little change. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(12):1201–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. American Geriatrics Society and Association of Directors of Geriatric Academic Programs (ADGAP). Geriatric Medicine: A Clinical Imperative for an Aging Population. New York; 2007.

  28. Berkman LF, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Maxim D. Shrayer Ph.D. provided constructive comments on earlier drafts of this paper; Melbeth G. Marlang, BA, assisted in manuscript preparation.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen E. Lasser MD, MPH.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 159 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lasser, K.E., Woolhandler, S. & Himmelstein, D.U. Sources of U.S. Physician Income: The Contribution of Government Payments to the Specialist–Generalist Income Gap. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 1477–1481 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0660-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0660-7

Key words

Navigation