Abstract
Background
Patient-centered access is a philosophy and a method that supports efforts to redesign health-care delivery systems to deliver higher quality care and to better meet the needs and preferences of patients. Since mid-2000, Group Health Cooperative has pursued an ensemble of strategic initiatives aimed at promoting patient-centered access, referred to as the Access Initiative. In support of this strategy, Group Health has also engaged in enterprise implementation of an electronic medical record and clinical information system that is integrated with their patient Web site, MyGroupHealth.
Objective
To elicit, describe, and characterize providers’ perceptions of the effects of the Access Initiative, an information technology-enabled organizational redesign initiative intended to promote patient-centered access.
Design
Thematic analysis of semi-structured in-depth interviews.
Participants
Twenty-two care providers representing 14 primary care, medical, and surgical specialties at Group Health Cooperative, an integrated health-care system based in Seattle, Washington.
Findings
Analyses of the interview transcripts revealed nine emergent themes, five of which have particular relevance for health-care organizations pursuing patient-centered access: the Access Initiative improved patient satisfaction, improved the quality of encounter-based care, compromised providers’ focus on population health, created additional work for providers, and decreased job satisfaction for primary care providers and some medical specialists.
Conclusions
Providers like that the Access Initiative is mostly good for their patients, but dislike the negative effects on their own quality of life – especially in primary care. These reforms may not be sustainable under current models of organization and financing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Woolf SH. Patient safety is not enough: targeting quality improvements to optimize the health of the population. Ann Intern Med. 2004;143:33–36.
Berry LL, Selders K, Wilder SS. Innovations in access to care: a patient-centered approach. Ann Int Med. 2003;139:568–574.
Berg M. Patient care information systems and health care work: a sociotechnical approach. Int J Med Inform. 1999;55:87–101.
Hartswood M, Proctor R, Rouncefield M, Slack R. Making a case in medical work: implications for the electronic medical record. Comput Support Coop Work. 2003;12:241–266.
Ash JS, Berg M, Coiera E. Some unintended consequences of information technology in healthcare: the nature of patient care information system-related errors. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:104–112.
Scott JT, Rundall TG, Vogt TM, Hsu J. Kaiser Permanente’s experience of implementing an electronic medical record: a qualitative study. BMJ. 2005;331:1313–1316.
Ornstein C. Hospital heeds doctors, suspends use of software: Cedars-Sinai physicians entered prescriptions and other orders in it, but called it unsafe. Los Angeles Times. January 22, 2003:B1.
Ralston JD. Group Health Cooperative’s transformation to patient-centered access. Managed Care Interface. (in press).
Ralston JD, Carrell D, Reid R, Anderson M, Moran M, Hereford J. Patient web services integrated with a shared medical record: patient use and satisfaction. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007;14:798–806.
U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC) website accessed July 25, 2008 http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/software/answr.htm
Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: Developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1758–1772.
Cooper RA, Gretzen TE, McKee HJ, Laud P. Economic and demographic trends signal an impending physician shortage. Health Aff. 2002;21:140–54.
Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Qtrly. 2005;83:457–502.
Garibaldi RA, Popkave C, Bylsma W. Career plans for trainees in internal medicine residency programs. Academic Med. 2005;142:715–724.
Schwartz MD, Basco WT Jr, Grey MR, Elmore JG, Rubenstein A. Rekindling student interest in generalist careers. Ann Intern Med. 2005;142:715–724.
Blue Ribbon Panel of the Society of General Internal Medicine. Redesigning the practice model for general internal medicine. A proposal for coordinated care: a policy monograph of the Society of General Internal Medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:400–409.
American Academy of Family Physicians, American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Physicians, American Osteopathic Association. Joint principles of the patient-centered medical home. February 2007. Website accessed 8/5/08 http://www.medicalhomeinfo.org/Joint%20Statement.pdf
Acknowledgments and Conflicts of Interest
This study was funded by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. All study activities and protocols were reviewed and approved by the Group Health Cooperative Center for Health Studies’ Institutional Review Board. While Mr. Tufano and Dr. Ralston are currently employed by the Group Health Cooperative Center for Health Studies, they retained full independence in the conduct of this research. Dr. Martin reports no potential conflict of interest related to this endeavor.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tufano, J.T., Ralston, J.D. & Martin, D.P. Providers’ Experience with an Organizational Redesign Initiative to Promote Patient-Centered Access: A Qualitative Study. J GEN INTERN MED 23, 1778–1783 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0761-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0761-3