Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Developing and Sustaining Quality Improvement Partnerships in the VA: The Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The Veterans Affairs (VA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) seeks to develop partnerships between VA health services researchers and clinical managers, with the goal of designing and evaluating interventions to improve the quality of VA health care.

Methods

In the present report we describe one such initiative aimed at enhancing the continuum of colorectal cancer (CRC) care, including diagnosis, treatment and surveillance–the Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative (C4).

Results

We describe the process and thinking that led to two parallel quality improvement “collaboratives” that addressed (1) CRC screening and diagnostic follow-up and (2) the guideline concordance and timeliness of CRC treatment. Additionally, we discuss ongoing effort to spread lessons learned during the first stages of the project, which initially occurred at only a subset of VA facilities, throughout the VA health care system. The description of this initiative is organized around key questions that must be answered when developing, sustaining and spreading multi-component quality improvement interventions.

Conclusion

We conclude with a discussion of lessons learned that we believe would apply to similar initiatives elsewhere, even if they address different clinical issues in health care settings with different organizational structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Taplin SH, Haggstrom D, Jacobs T, et al. Implementing colorectal cancer screening in community health centers: addressing cancer health disparities through a regional cancer collaborative. Med Care. 2008;46:S74–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McQueen L, Mittman BS, Demakis JG. Overview of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI). J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004;11:339–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stetler CB, Mittman BS, Francis J. Overview of the VA Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI) and QUERI theme articles: QUERI Series. Implement Sci. 2008;3:8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yu W, Cowper D, Berger M, Kuebeler M, Kubal J, Manheim L. Using GIS to profile health-care costs of VA Quality-Enhancement Research Initiative diseases. J Med Syst. 2004;28:271–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. Jama. 2002;288:1775–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology. 2008;134:1570–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Liles E, Beil TL, Fu R. Screening for colorectal cancer: a targeted, updated systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:638–58.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [2009]. Colon Cancer. 1, Translator. 2009-2 vol. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  9. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology [2009]. Rectal Cancer. 2, Translator. 2009-2 vol. Fort Washington, PA: National Comprehensive Cancer Network; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Locker GY, Hamilton S, Harris J, et al. ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:5313–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rex DK, Kahi CJ, Levin B, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after cancer resection: a consensus update by the American Cancer Society and US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006;56:160–7. quiz 185-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cruse H, Winiarek M, Marshburn J, Clark O, Djulbegovic B. Quality and methods of developing practice guidelines. BMC Health Serv Res. 2002;2:1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Conway PH, Clancy C. Comparative-effectiveness research–implications of the Federal Coordinating Council’s report. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:328–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schall MW, Duffy T, Krishnamurthy A, et al. Improving patient access to the Veterans Health Administration’s primary care and specialty clinics. Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004;30:415–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Perlin JB, Kolodner RM, Roswell RH. The Veterans Health Administration: quality, value, accountability, and information as transforming strategies for patient-centered care. Am J Manag Care. 2004;10:828–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lukas CV, Meterko MM, Mohr D, et al. Implementation of a clinical innovation: the case of advanced clinic access in the Department of Veterans Affairs. J Ambul Care Manage. 2008;31:94–108.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hershman D, Hall MJ, Wang X, et al. Timing of adjuvant chemotherapy initiation after surgery for stage III colon cancer. Cancer. 2006;107:2581–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Desch CE, McNiff KK, Schneider EC, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/National Comprehensive Cancer Network Quality Measures. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:3631–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Murray M, Berwick DM. Advanced access: reducing waiting and delays in primary care. Jama. 2003;289:1035–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray M, Bodenheimer T, Rittenhouse D, Grumbach K. Improving timely access to primary care: case studies of the advanced access model. Jama. 2003;289:1042–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wagner EH. Chronic disease management: what will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Eff Clin Pract. 1998;1:2–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. Jama. 2002;288:1909–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Coleman K, Austin BT, Brach C, Wagner EH. Evidence on the chronic care model in the new millennium. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009;28:75–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zapka JG, Taplin SH, Solberg LI, Manos MM. A framework for improving the quality of cancer care: the case of breast and cervical cancer screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2003;12:4–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kilo CM. Improving care through collaboration. Pediatrics. 1999;103:384–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nelson EC, Splaine ME, Batalden PB, Plume SK. Building measurement and data collection into medical practice. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:460–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wingo PA, Howe HL, Thun MJ, et al. A national framework for cancer surveillance in the United States. Cancer Causes Control. 2005;16:151–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Carney PA, Hoffman RM, Lieberman DA, Hornbrook MC, Dietrich AJ, Klabunde CN. Data systems to evaluate colorectal cancer screening practices and outcomes at the population level. Med Care. 2008;46:S132–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson JC, Rungtusanatham M, Schoeder RG. A theory of quality management underlying the Deming management method. Acad Manage Rev. 1994;19:472–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Berwick DM. Developing and testing changes in delivery of care. Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:651–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Powell AA, Gravely AA, Ordin DL, Schlosser JE, Partin MR. Timely follow-up of positive fecal occult blood tests strategies associated with improvement. Am J Prev Med. 2009;37:87–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Von Korff M. Organizing care for patients with chronic illness. Milbank Q. 1996;74:511–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Powell AA, Ordin DL, Provenzale DT, Jackson GL, Bloomfield HE. Process evaluation of the VA Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative (C4). Network Directors Special Poster Session, 25th Annual VA Health Services Research & Development Annual Meeting. Arlington, VA; February 2007.

  34. Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, Hindmarsh M, Schaefer J, Bonomi A. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:64–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative involved teams of dedicated VA employees from 21 facilities participating in the diagnosis improvement collaborative and 28 facilities participating in the treatment improvement collaborative. We thank all of them for their hard work and dedication to improving the care provided to veterans. Work of the C4 collaborative was summarized at the Veterans Affairs Quality Enhancement Research Initiative National Meeting on December 11, 2008, in Phoenix, AZ.

Funding

Funding for quality improvement activities of the Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative (C4) was provided by the VA Office of Quality and Performance and the Office of Systems Redesign. Development of the Cancer Care Quality Measurement System (CCQMS) was funded by the VA Health Services Research and Development Service (HSR&D grant CRT-05-338). Initial funding leading to the development of the CCQMS was provided by the National Cancer Institute (NCI) (V246S-00054, Y1-PC-8218-01, and HHSN261200800504P). Additional funding for C4 measurement activities was funded through core funding of the HSR&D Colorectal Cancer Care Quality Enhancement Research Initiative (QUERI). Dr. Jackson is a VA HSR&D Merit Review Entry Program awardee (MRP 05-312). During part of this work, Dr. Powell was the implementation coordinator for the Colorectal Cancer QUERI. Dr. Haggstrom has a VA HSR&D career development award (CD207016-2). Dr. Povenzale is funded in part by a K-24 career development award from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) (5 K24 DK002926).

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the Department of Veterans Affairs of the United States government.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report. All authors, with the exception of Ms. Parlier (retired), are current employees of the Department of Veterans Affairs. The authors received no compensation apart from their employment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George L. Jackson PhD, MHA.

Additional information

The following individuals have also served on the Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative Planning Committee: Jacki Bebb, BSB/M; Hanna E. Bloomfield, MD, MPH; Cody Couch; Carrie J. DeKorte, PharmD, BCPS, FACHE; Deborah Duncan, MPH, CHES; Jill Edwards, NP; Theresa Hellings, RD; John M. Inadomi, MD; Laura Kochevar, Ph.D.; Odette Levesque, RN, MBA, FACHE ; Irma McCaffrey, BA; Heidi L. Martin, BSN, MPH; RimaAnn O. Nelson, RN, MPH/HAS

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jackson, G.L., Powell, A.A., Ordin, D.L. et al. Developing and Sustaining Quality Improvement Partnerships in the VA: The Colorectal Cancer Care Collaborative. J GEN INTERN MED 25 (Suppl 1), 38–43 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1155-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1155-x

KEY WORDS

Navigation