Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Antihypertensive Medication Adherence, Ambulatory Visits, and Risk of Stroke and Death

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study seeks to determine whether antihypertensive medication refill adherence, ambulatory visits, and type of antihypertensive medication exposures are associated with decreased stroke and death for community-dwelling hypertensive patients.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included all chronic medication-treated hypertensives enrolled in Tennessee’s Medicaid program (TennCare) for 3–7 years during the period 1994–2000 (n = 49,479). Health care utilization patterns were evaluated using administrative data linked to vital records during a 2-year run-in period and 1- to 5-year follow-up period. Antihypertensive medication refill adherence was calculated using pharmacy records.

RESULTS

Associations with stroke and death were assessed using Cox proportional hazards modeling. Stroke occurred in 619 patients (1.25%) and death in 2,051 (4.15%). Baseline antihypertensive medication refill adherence was associated with decreased multivariate hazards of stroke [hazard ratio (HR) 0.91; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.86–0.97 for 15% increase in adherence]. Adherence in the follow-up period was associated with decreased hazards of stroke (HR 0.92; CI 0.87–0.96) and death (HR 0.93; CI 0.90–0.96). Baseline ambulatory visits were associated with decreased death (HR 0.99; CI 0.98–1.00). Four major classes of antihypertensive agents were associated with mortality reduction. Only thiazide-type diuretic use was associated with decreased stroke (HR 0.89; CI 0.85–0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory visits and antihypertensive medication exposures are associated with reduced mortality. Increasing adherence by one pill per week for a once-a-day regimen reduces the hazard of stroke by 8–9% and death by 7%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Steiner JF, Koepsell TD, Fihn SD, Inui TS. A general method of compliance assessment using centralized pharmacy records. Description and validation. Med Care. 1988;26(8):814–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hess LM, Raebel MA, Conner DA, Malone DC. Measurement of adherence in pharmacy administrative databases: a proposal for standard definitions and preferred measures. Ann Pharmacother. 2006;40(7–8):1280–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bailey JE, Lee MD, Somes GW, Graham RL. Risk factors for antihypertensive medication refill failure by patients under Medicaid managed care. Clin Ther. 1996;18(6):1252–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Choo PW, Rand CS, Inui TS, et al. Validation of patient reports, automated pharmacy records, and pill counts with electronic monitoring of adherence to antihypertensive therapy. Med Care. 1999;37(9):846–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to medication. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(5):487–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sokol MC, McGuigan KA, Verbrugge RR, Epstein RS. Impact of medication adherence on hospitalization risk and healthcare cost. Med Care. 2005;43(6):521–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Weiden PJ, Kozma C, Grogg A, Locklear J. Partial compliance and risk of rehospitalization among California Medicaid patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 2004;55(8):886–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Karve S, Cleves MA, Helm M, Hudson TJ, West DS, Martin BC. An empirical basis for standardizing adherence measures derived from administrative claims data among diabetic patients. Med Care. 2008;46(11):1125–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wetzels GE, Nelemans P, Schouten JS, Prins MH. Facts and fiction of poor compliance as a cause of inadequate blood pressure control: a systematic review. J Hypertens. 2004;22(10):1849–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Richter A, Anton SE, Koch P, Dennett SL. The impact of reducing dose frequency on health outcomes. Clin Ther. 2003;25(8):2307–35. discussion 6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kettani FZ, Dragomir A, Cote R, et al. Impact of a better adherence to antihypertensive agents on cerebrovascular disease for primary prevention. Stroke. 2009;40(1):213–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weinberger M, Oddone EZ, Henderson WG. Does increased access to primary care reduce hospital readmissions? Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Primary Care and Hospital Readmission. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(22):1441–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma J, Stafford RS. Screening, treatment, and control of hypertension in US private physician offices, 2003–2004. Hypertension. 2008;51(5):1275–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb DJ, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending. Part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(4):288–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in moderately hypercholesterolemic, hypertensive patients randomized to pravastatin vs usual care: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT-LLT). JAMA. 2002;288(23):2998–3007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Connor J, Rafter N, Rodgers A. Do fixed-dose combination pills or unit-of-use packaging improve adherence? A systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(12):935–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang J, Wan JY, Bailey JE. Performance of comorbidity measures to predict stroke and death in a community-dwelling, hypertensive Medicaid population. Stroke. 2008;39(7):1938–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ray WA. Policy and program analysis using administrative databases. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(8 Pt 2):712–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rosamond WD, Folsom AR, Chambless LE, et al. Stroke incidence and survival among middle-aged adults: 9-year follow-up of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) cohort. Stroke. 1999;30(4):736–43.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Benesch C, Witter DM Jr, Wilder AL, Duncan PW, Samsa GP, Matchar DB. Inaccuracy of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9-CM) in identifying the diagnosis of ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Neurology. 1997;49(3):660–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Leibson CL, Naessens JM, Brown RD, Whisnant JP. Accuracy of hospital discharge abstracts for identifying stroke. Stroke. 1994;25(12):2348–55.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reker DM, Hamilton BB, Duncan PW, Yeh SC, Rosen A. Stroke: who’s counting what? J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001;38(2):281–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Marini C, Baldassarre M, Russo T, et al. Burden of first-ever ischemic stroke in the oldest old: evidence from a population-based study. Neurology. 2004;62(1):77–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, et al. Seventh report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Hypertension. 2003;42(6):1206–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gil-Nunez AC, Vivancos-Mora J. Blood pressure as a risk factor for stroke and the impact of antihypertensive treatment. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2005;20(Suppl 2):40–52.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Steiner JF, Prochazka AV. The assessment of refill compliance using pharmacy records: methods, validity, and applications. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(1):105–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Allison PD. Survival Analysis Using SAS: A Practical Guide. Cary: SAS Institute, Inc; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  28. SAS Institute. Statistical Analysis System (SAS). In. 9.1 ed. Cary, NC; 2003.

  29. Chapman RH, Benner JS, Petrilla AA, et al. Predictors of adherence with antihypertensive and lipid-lowering therapy. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(10):1147–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhang X, Loberiza FR, Klein JP, Zhang MJ. A SAS macro for estimation of direct adjusted survival curves based on a stratified Cox regression model. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2007;88(2):95–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kaplan EL, Meier P. Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1958;53:457–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Vey N, Blaise D, Stoppa AM, et al. Bone marrow transplantation in 63 adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first complete remission. Bone Marrow Transplant. 1994;14(3):383–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xie J, Liu C. Adjusted Kaplan-Meier estimator and log-rank test with inverse probability of treatment weighting for survival data. Stat Med. 2005;24(20):3089–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Siegel D, Lopez J, Meier J. Antihypertensive medication adherence in the Department of Veterans Affairs. Am J Med. 2007;120(1):26–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Elliott WJ, Plauschinat CA, Skrepnek GH, Gause D. Persistence, adherence, and risk of discontinuation associated with commonly prescribed antihypertensive drug monotherapies. J Am Board Fam Med. 2007;20(1):72–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Therapeutics Initiative: Evidence Based Drug Therapy. Do Statins have a role in primary prevention? In: Therapeutics Letter; 2003.

  37. Ong KL, Cheung BM, Man YB, Lau CP, Lam KS. Prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension among United States adults 1999–2004. Hypertension. 2007;49(1):69–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Gu Q, Burt VL, Paulose-Ram R, Yoon S, Gillum RF. High blood pressure and cardiovascular disease mortality risk among US adults: the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey mortality follow-up study. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18(4):302–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Turnbull F. Effects of different blood-pressure-lowering regimens on major cardiovascular events: results of prospectively-designed overviews of randomised trials. Lancet. 2003;362(9395):1527–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Psaty BM, Lumley T, Furberg CD, et al. Health outcomes associated with various antihypertensive therapies used as first-line agents: a network meta-analysis. JAMA. 2003;289(19):2534–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Beckett NS, Peters R, Fletcher AE, et al. Treatment of hypertension in patients 80 years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(18):1887–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Stroupe KT, Teal EY, Tu W, Weiner M, Murray MD. Association of refill adherence and health care use among adults with hypertension in an urban health care system. Pharmacotherapy. 2006;26(6):779–89.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Thorpe CT, Bryson CL, Maciejewski ML, Bosworth HB. Medication acquisition and self-reported adherence in veterans with hypertension. Med Care. 2009;47(4):474–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the American Heart Association. The authors gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the TennCare Bureau of the State of Tennessee, Catherine Lewis and Deborah Gibson for their substantial editorial assistance, Grant Somes, PhD, and Andy Bush, PhD, for their assistance with the study design and analysis plan, and William Pulsinelli, MD, for contributing his advice and content expertise on the design and implementation of the study.

Conflicts of Interest

Dr. James Bailey has received a grant from Novo Nordisk, Inc., for reporting on diabetes quality of care, 2006–2008.

Jun Tang has been employed by Accredo Health Group, Inc., since 2007.

Dr. William Cushman has consulted for Sanofi-Aventis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, Forest, King Pharmaceuticals, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Roche, Takeda, Sciele, Pharmacopeia, and Gilead. He has received grants from Astra-Zeneca, Sanofi-Aventis, King, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis. He has a grant request pending with GlaxoSmithKline.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James E. Bailey MD, MPH.

Additional information

Data for this study were also used in the following

Poster presentation. Academy Health, Washington DC, June 9, 2008. Bailey JE, Wan JY, Tang J, Ghani MA, Cushman WC. Antihypertensive medication adherence protects community dwelling hypertensive people from strokes and death.

Tang, J, Wan, JY, and Bailey, JE. Performance of comorbidity measures to predict stroke and death in a community-dwelling, hypertensive Medicaid population. Stroke 2008;39:1938–1944.

This research was supported by a grant from the American Heart Association.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bailey, J.E., Wan, J.Y., Tang, J. et al. Antihypertensive Medication Adherence, Ambulatory Visits, and Risk of Stroke and Death. J GEN INTERN MED 25, 495–503 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1240-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-009-1240-1

Key Words

Navigation