Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Patient Navigation to Increase Mammography Screening Among Inner City Women

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Lower mammography screening rates among minority and low income women contribute to increased morbidity and mortality from breast cancer.

Objective

To evaluate the effect of a patient navigation intervention on adherence rates to biennial screening mammography among women engaged in primary care at an inner-city academic medical center.

Design

Quality improvement intervention with a concurrent control group, conducted from February to November of 2008.

Study Subjects

All women in a hospital-based primary care practice aged 51–70 years. Subjects were randomized at the level of their primary care provider, such that half of the patients in the practice received the intervention, while the other half received usual care.

Interventions

Intervention subjects whose last mammogram was >18 months prior received a combination of telephone calls and reminder letters from patient navigators trained to identify barriers to care. Navigators were integrated into primary care teams and interacted directly with patients, providers, and radiology to coordinate care. Navigators utilized an electronic report to track subjects. Adherence rates to biennial mammography were assessed in intervention and control groups at baseline and post-intervention.

Key Results

A total of 3,895 women were randomized to intervention (n = 1,817) and control (n = 2,078) groups. Mean age was 60, 71% were racial/ethnic minorities, 23% were non-English speaking, and 63% had public or no health insurance. At baseline, there was no difference in mammography adherence between the control and intervention groups (78%, respectively, p = 0.55). After the 9-month intervention, mammogram adherence was higher in the intervention group compared with the control group (87% vs. 76%, respectively, p < 0.001). Except among Hispanic women who demonstrated high rates in both the intervention and control groups (85% and 83%, respectively), all racial/ethnic and insurance groups demonstrated higher adherence in the intervention group.

Conclusions

Patient navigation improves biennial mammography rates for inner city, low income, minority populations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. National Cancer Institute. Breast Cancer. <http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/breast. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Breast Cancer. <http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/statistics/race.htm >. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  3. Kagawa-Singer M, Dadia AV, Yu MC, Surbone A. Cancer, culture, and health disparities: time to chart a new course? CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(1):12–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hershman D, McBride R, Jacobson JS, et al. Racial disparities in treatment and survival among women with early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(27):6639–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Harper S, Lynch J, Meersman SC, Breen N, Davis WW, Reichman MC. Trends in area-socioeconomic and race-ethnic disparities in breast cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, screening, mortality, and survival among women ages 50 years and over (1987–2005). Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2009;18(1):121–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Lurie N, et al. Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(8):541–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System summary data quality reports. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services. <www.cdc.gov/brfss/technical_infodata/quality.htm>. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  8. Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mammography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2002;11(1):59–71.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wells KJ, Battaglia TA, Dudley DJ, et al. Patient navigation: state of the art or is it science? Cancer. 2008;113(8):1999–2010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Battaglia TA, Roloff K, Posner MA, Freund KM. Improving follow-up to abnormal breast cancer screening in an urban population. A patient navigation intervention. Cancer. 2007;109(2 Suppl):359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ell K, Vourlekis B, Lee PJ, Xie B. Patient navigation and case management following an abnormal mammogram: a randomized clinical trial. Prev Med. 2007;44(1):26–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Psooy BJ, Schreuer D, Borgaonkar J, Caines JS. Patient navigation: improving timeliness in the diagnosis of breast abnormalities. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2004;55(3):145–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrante JM, Chen PH, Kim S. The effect of patient navigation on time to diagnosis, anxiety, and satisfaction in urban minority women with abnormal mammograms: a randomized controlled trial. J Urban Health. 2008;85(1):114–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lobb R, Allen JD, Emmons KM, Ayanian JZ. Timely care after an abnormal mammogram among low-income women in a public breast cancer screening program. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(6):521–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Dignan MB, Burhansstipanov L, Hariton J, et al. A comparison of two Native American Navigator formats: face-to-face and telephone. Cancer Control. 2005;12(Suppl 2):28–33.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paskett E, Tatum C, Rushing J, et al. Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006;98(17):1226–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Han HR, Lee H, Kim MT, Kim KB. Tailored lay health worker intervention improves breast cancer screening outcomes in non-adherent Korean-American women. Health Educ Res. 2009;24(2):318–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. HEDIS. Technical Specifications, Vol. 2. Washington, D.C: National Committee for Quality Assurance; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Calhoun EA, Whitley EM, Esparza A, et al. A National Patient Navigator Training Program. Health Promot Pract. 2008. doi:10.1177/1524839908323521. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  20. Central Massachusetts Area Health Education Center: Outreach Worker Training Institute. <http://cmahec.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=46&Itemid=59>. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  21. Ward MD, Rieve JA. The role of case management in disease management. In: Todd WE, Nash E, eds. Disease management: A Systems Approach to Improving Patient Outcomes. Chicago, IL: American Hospital Publishing; 1997:235–59.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Laiteerapong N, Sherman BJ, Kim K, Freund K. Validation of racial categorization in a hospital administrative database. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20(Suppl 1):130.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Health Connector Facts and Figures, March 2009. Commonwealth Connector. <http://www.mahealthconnector.org/portal/site/connector/menuitem.d7b34e88a23468a2dbef6f47d7468a0c?fiShown=default>. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program Fact Sheet 2004/2005. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40(5):373–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA. Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45(6):613–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Brooks D, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2010: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and issues in cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(2):99–119.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. David MM, Ko L, Prudent N, Green EH, Posner MA, Freund KM. Mammography use. J Natl Med Assoc. 2005;97(2):253–61.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Palmer RC, Fernandez ME, Tortolero-Luna G, Gonzales A, Mullen DP. Acculturation and mammography screening among Hispanic women living in farmworker communities. Cancer Control. 2005;12(Suppl 2):21–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zambrana RE, Breen N, Fox SA, Gutierrez-Mohamed ML. Use of cancer screening practices by Hispanic women: analyses by subgroup. Prev Med. 1999;29(6 Pt 1):466–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. National Committee for Quality Assurance. Physician Practice Connections–Patient-Centered Medical Home (PPC-PCMH). <http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/631/Default.aspx>. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  32. Fisher ES. Building a medical neighborhood for the medical home. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(12):1202–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Understanding the Patient-Centered Medical Home. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians, 2010. <http://www.acponline.org/advocacy/where_we_stand/medical_home/. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  34. Joint Principles of the Patient-Centered Medical Home Released by Organizations Representing More Than 300,000 Physicians. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians, 2007. <http://www.acponline.org/pressroom/pcmh.htm. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  35. Screening for breast cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):716–26

  36. Qaseem A, Snow V, Sherif K, Aronson M, Weiss KB, Owens DK. Screening mammography for women 40 to 49 years of age: a clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2007;146(7):511–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. The American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Responds to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force’s Breast Cancer Guidelines. <http://www.acog.org/acog_districts/dist_notice.cfm?recno=13&bulletin=3160. Accessed September 13, 2010.

  38. Steinbrook R. Health Care and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(11):1057–1060.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Regulations and Guidance. <http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/community/healthit_hhs_gov_regulations_and_%20guidance/1496>. Accessed September 13, 2010.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Funded by the Avon Foundation Safety Net Grant. The study would like to acknowledge the contributions of Faber Alvis, Mariuca Tuxbury, and Arlene Ash, PhD. This study was presented as an oral presentation at the 32nd annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine conference in Miami in May 2009.

Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Christine E. Phillips MD

    Present address: Women’s Health Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Women’s Health Interdisciplinary Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Women’s Health Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, and Women’s Health Interdisciplinary Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA

    Jessica D. Rothstein BA, Kristine Beaver MPH, Bonnie J. Sherman PhD, Karen M. Freund MD, MPH & Tracy A. Battaglia MD, MPH

Authors
  1. Christine E. Phillips MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jessica D. Rothstein BA
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kristine Beaver MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bonnie J. Sherman PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Karen M. Freund MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tracy A. Battaglia MD, MPH
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine E. Phillips MD.

Electronic Supplementary Materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 30 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Phillips, C.E., Rothstein, J.D., Beaver, K. et al. Patient Navigation to Increase Mammography Screening Among Inner City Women. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 123–129 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1527-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-010-1527-2

Key Words

Search

Navigation