ABSTRACT
Medical malpractice reform is both necessary and desirable, yet certain types of reform are clearly preferable to others. We argue that “traditional” tort reform remedies such as stringent damage caps not only fail to address the root causes of negligence and the adverse effects that fear of suit can have on physicians, but also fail to address the needs of patients. Physicians ought to view themselves as professionals who are dedicated to putting patients’ interests ahead of their own. Professionally responsible malpractice reform should therefore be at least as patient-centered as it is physician-centered. Examples of more professionally responsible malpractice reform exist where institutions take a pro-active approach to identification, investigation, and remediation of possible malpractice. Such programs should be implemented more generally, and state laws enacted to facilitate them.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Hermer LD, Brody H. Defensive medicine, cost containment, and reform, J Gen Intern Med 2010; 25(5):470-3.
Medical professionalism project. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians' charter. Lancet 2002;359(9305):520-2.
Shapiro RS, Simpson DE, Lawrence SL, et al. A survey of sued and nonsued physicians and suing patients. Arch. Int. Med. 1989; 149(10):2190-96.
Charles SC, Wilbert JR, Franke KJ. Sued and nonsued physicians’ self-reported reactions to malpractice litigation. Am. J. Psychiatry 1985; 142: 437-440.
Martin CA, Wilson JF, Fiebelman ND 3d, Gurley DN, Miller TW. Physicians' psychologic reactions to malpractice litigation. South Med J 1991; Nov;84(11):1300-4.
Bredfelt RC, Ripani A Jr., Cuddeback GL. Emotional response to malpractice suits: should residents be prepared? Fam Med 1987;19(6):465-7.
McQuade JS. The medical malpractice crisis—reflections on the alleged causes and proposed cures: discussion paper. J R Soc Med 1991;84:408–11.
U.S. Congress, Office of Technology Assessment. Defensive medicine and medical malpractice. 1994. Available at biotech.law.lsu.edu/policy/9405.pdf. Accessed December 27, 2010.
Passmore K, Leung W-C. Defensive practice among psychiatrists: a questionnaire survey. Postgraduate Medical Journal 2002;78:671-673.
Summerton N. Positive and negative factors in defensive medicine: a questionnaire study of general practitioners. BMJ 1995; 310:27-29.
Chawla A, Gunderman RB. Defensive medicine: prevalence, implications, and recommendations. Acad Radiol 2008; 15:948–949.
Dubay L, Kaestner R, Waidmann T. The impact of malpractice fears on cesarean section rates. J Health Econ 1999;18: 491–522.
Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage, WM et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 2005;293(21):2609-17.
Sloan FA, Shadle JH. Is there empirical evidence for “Defensive medicine”? A reassessment. J Health Econ 2009;28:481-91.
Grepperud S. Medical errors: responsibility and informal penalties. Harvard Health Pol Rev 2004;5(1):89-95.
Mello MM, Brennan TA. Deterrence of medical errors: theory and evidence for malpractice reform. Tex L Rev 2002;80:1595-1637.
Massachusetts Medical Society. Investigation of defensive medicine in Massachusetts. 2008. Available at: http://www.massmed.org/AM/Template.cfm?Section=News_and_Publications2&CONTENTID=27797&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm. Accessed Dec. 27, 2010.
Studdert DM, Mello MM, Sage, WM et al. Defensive medicine among high-risk specialist physicians in a volatile malpractice environment. JAMA 2005;293(21):2609-17.
Mehlman MJ. Malpractice reforms: are they fair? Clin Perinatol 2005; 32:235-249.
Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS, eds. To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1999.
Sloan FA, Mergenhagen PM, Bovbjerg RR. Effects of tort reform on the value of closed malpractice claims: a microanalysis. J Health Pol Policy L 1989;14(4):663-89.
Baker T. The medical malpractice myth. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press; 2005:45-58.
Black BS, Silver C, Hyman DA, Sage WM. Stability not crisis: Medical malpractice claim outcomes in Texas: 1988-2002. J Emp L Studies 2005;2:207-59.
Carrier ER, Reschovsky JD, Mello MM et al. Physicians’ fears of malpractice lawsuits are not assuaged by tort reforms. Health Aff 2010;29(9):1585-92.
Mello MM, Chandra A, Gawande AA, et al. National costs of the medical liability system. Health Aff 2010;29(9):1569-75.
Smith-Bindman R, McCullough CE, Ding A, Quale C, Chu PW. Diagnostic imaging rates for head injury in the ED and states’ medical malpractice tort reforms. Am J Emerg Med 2010; July 12 (epub).
Mello MM, Gallagher TH. Malpractice reform—opportunities for leadership by health care institutions and liability insurers. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:1353-56.
Anderson S. Liability claims and costs before and after implementation of a medical error disclosure program. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:213-221.
Kraman SS, Hamm G. Risk management: Extreme honesty may be the best policy. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:963-67.
Mastroianni AC, Mello MM, Sommer S, Hardy M, Gallagher TH. The flaws in state ‘apology’ and ‘disclosure’ laws dilute their intended impact on malpractice suits. Health Aff 2010;29(9):1611-19.
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical liability reform and patient safety: demonstration grants. Available at http://www.ahrq.gov/qual/liability/demogrants.htm. Accessed Dec. 27, 2010.
Campbell EG, Regan S, Gruen RL, et al. Professionalism in medicine: results of a national survey of physicians. Ann Internal Med 2007;147(11):795-802.
Rabow MW, Wrubel J, Remen RN. Promise of professionalism: personal mission statements among a national cohort of medical students. Ann Fam Med 2009;7(4):336-42.
Conflicts of Interest
None disclosed.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brody, H., Hermer, L.D. Professionally Responsible Malpractice Reform. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 806–809 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1635-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1635-7