Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Case for Synergy Between a Usual Source of Care and Health Insurance Coverage

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In 2010, the United States (US) passed health insurance reforms aimed at expanding coverage to the uninsured. Yet, disparities persist in access to health care services, even among the insured.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the separate and combined association between having health insurance and/or a usual source of care (USC) and self-reported receipt of health care services.

DESIGN/SETTING

Two-tailed, chi-square analyses and logistic regression models were used to analyze nationally representative pooled 2002–2007 data from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS).

PARTICIPANTS

US adults (≥18 years of age) in the MEPS population who had at least one health care visit and who needed any care, tests, or treatment in the past year (n = 62,067).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We assessed the likelihood of an adult reporting unmet medical needs; unmet prescription needs; a problem getting care, tests, or treatment; and delayed care based on whether each individual had health insurance, a USC, both, or neither one.

KEY RESULTS

Among adults who reported a doctor visit and a need for services in the past year, having both health insurance and a USC was associated with the lowest percentage of unmet medical needs, problems and delays in getting care while having neither one was associated with the highest unmet medical needs, problems and delays in care. After adjusting for potentially confounding covariates (age, race, ethnicity, employment, geographic residence, education, household income as a percent of federal poverty level, health status, and marital status ), compared with insured adults who also had a USC, insured adults without a USC were more likely to have problems getting care, tests or treatment (adjusted relative risk [aRR] 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.18–1.37); and also had a higher likelihood of experiencing a delay in urgent care (aRR 1.12; 95% CI 1.05–1.20).

CONCLUSIONS

Amidst ongoing health care reform, these findings suggest the important role that both health insurance coverage and a usual source of care may play in facilitating individuals’ access to care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hadley J. Sicker and poorer: the consequences of being uninsured. Med Care Res Rev. 2003;60(2 Suppl):3S–75S.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaiser Family Foundation. Barriers to Health Care Among Nonelderly Adults, by Insurance Status, 2008 http://www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/1420-10.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2011.

  3. Institute of Medicine. America’s Uninsured Crisis: Consequences for Health and Healthcare, February 2009. http://www.iom.edu/∼/media/Files/Report%20Files/2009/Americas-Uninsured-Crisis-Consequences-for-Health-and-Health-Care/Americas%20Uninsured%206%20pager%20FINAL%20for%20web.ashx. January 26, 2011.

  4. Hoffman C, Schoen C, Rowland D, Davis K. Gaps in health coverage among working-age Americans and the consequences. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2001;12(3):272–89.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaiser Family Foundation. Language, Other Barriers Play Role in Quality of Care Differences Between Privately, Publicly Insured Patients, Sept. 2008. http://dailyreports.kff.org/Daily-Reports/2008/September/24/dr00054642.aspx. Accessed January 26, 2011.

  6. Smith DB, Feng Z, Fennell ML, Zinn JS, Mor V. Separate and unequal: racial segregation and disparities in quality across U.S. nursing homes. Health Aff. 2007;26(5):1448–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Donelan K, DesRoches CM, Schoen C. Inadequate health insurance: costs and consequences. Medgenmed [Computer File]: Medscape General Medicine. 2000;2(3):E37.

  8. DeVoe J, Baez A, Angier H, Krois L, Edlund C, Carney P. Insurance + access does not equal health care: typology of barriers to health care access for low-income families. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5(6):511–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shi LY. The convergence of vulnerable characteristics and health insurance in the US. Social Science & Medicine. 2001;53(4):519–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McCormick D, Woolhandler S, Bose-Kolanu A, Germann A, Bor DH, Himmelstein DU. U.S. physicians' views on financing options to expand health insurance coverage: a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(4):526–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen RA, Bloom B, Simpson G, Parsons PE. Access to health care. Part 3: Older adults. Vital & Health Statistics - Series 10: Data From the National Health Survey. July 1997(198):1–32.

  12. Starfield B. Access, primary care, and medical home: rights of passage. Med Care. 2008;46(10):1015–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Long SK, Masi PB. Access and affordability: an update on health reform in Massachusetts. Health Aff. 2009;28(4):w578–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brown E. Children’s Usual Source of Care: United States, 2002. MEPS Statistical Brief #78. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2005.

  15. Hoilette L, Clark S, Gebremariam A, et al. Usual source of care and unmet needs among vulnerable children: 1998–2006. Pediatrics. 2009;123(2):e214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. No Usual Source of Health Care Among Adults (NHIS report). http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/health_policy/adults_no_source_health_care.htm. Accessed January 26, 2011.

  17. Weiss E, Haslanger K, Cantor J. Accessibility of primary care services in safety net clinics in New York City. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(8):1240–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robert L. Phillips J, Dodoo MS, Petterson S, et al. What Influences Medical Student & Resident Choices: Robert Graham Center; 2009.

  19. Rosenthal MB, Li Z, Milstein A. Do patients continue to see physicians who are removed from a PPO network? Am J Manage Care. 2009;15(10):713–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Short AC, Mays GP, Lake TK. Provider network instability: implications for choice, costs and continuity of care. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2001;39:1–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. DeVoe J, Fryer G, Phillips R, Green L. Receipt of preventive care among adults: insurance status and usual source of care. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:786–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Allred N, Wooten K, Kong Y. The association of health insurance and continuous primary care in the medical home on vaccination coverage for 19- to 35-month-old children. Pediatrics. 2007;119(Suppl 1):S4–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bindman AB, Grumbach K, Osmond D, Vranizan K, Stewart AL. Primary care and receipt of preventive services. J Gen Intern Med. 1996;11:269–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sox CM, Swartz K, Burstin HR, Brennan TA. Insurance or a regular physician: Which is the most powerful predictor of health care? Am J Public Health. 1998;88(3):364–70.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. DeVoe JE, Petering R, Krois L. A usual source of care: supplement or substitute for health insurance among low-income children? Medical Care. 2008.

  26. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. MEPS HC-089: 2004 Full Year Consolidated Data File. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/download_data/pufs/h89/h89doc.pdf. Accessed January 26, 2011.

  27. Cohen J, Monheit A, Beauregard K, et al. The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: a national health information resource. Inquiry. 1996;Winter:373–89.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Aday LA, Andersen R. A framework for the study of access to medical care. Health Services Research. 1974;9:208–20.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Andersen R. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? J Health Soc Behav. 1995;36:1–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Davidson PL, Andersen RM, Wyn R, et al. A framework for evaluating safety-net and other community-level factors on access for low-income populations. Inquiry. 2004;41(1):21–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang J, Yu K. What’s the relative risk? A method of correcting the odds ratio in cohort studies of common outcomes. J Am Med Assoc. 1998;280:1690–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. McWilliams JM. Health consequences of uninsurance among adults in the United States: recent evidence and implications. Milbank Q. 2009;87(2):443–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. McWilliams JM, Meara E, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ. Use of health services by previously uninsured Medicare beneficiaries. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(2):143–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. McWilliams JM, Meara E, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ. Health of previously uninsured adults after acquiring Medicare coverage. J Am Med Assoc. 2007;298(24):2886–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. McWilliams JM, Meara E, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ. Intensity of health services and costs of care for previously uninsured Medicare beneficiaries. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:67–8.

    Google Scholar 

  36. McWilliams, JM, Zaslavsky, AM, Meara, E, Ayanian, JZ. Impact of Medicare Coverage on Basic Clinical Services for Previously Uninsured Adults. JAMA. 2003;290:757–764

    Google Scholar 

  37. McWilliams JM, Meara E, Zaslavsky AM, Ayanian JZ. Differences in Control of Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes by Race, Ethnicity, and Education: U. S. Trends From 1999 to 2006 and Effects of Medicare Coverage. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150(8):505–W590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Zuckerman S, McFeeters J, Cunningham P, Nichols L. Changes in Medicaid physician fees, 1998–2003: implications for physician participation. Health Affairs. 2004 Suppl W4:374–84.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wilson J. Massachusetts health care reform is a pioneer effort, but complications remain. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(6):489–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Starfield B. Insurance and the US health care system. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(4):418–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Gold R, DeVoe J, Shah A, Chauvie S. Insurance continuity and receipt of diabetes preventive care in Oregon's CHCs. Med Care. 2008;47(4):431–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Starfield B, Shi L. The medical home, access to care, and insurance: a review of evidence. Pediatrics. 2004;2004(113: Suppl):1493–8.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Palfrey JS, Sofis LA, Davidson EJ, Liu JH, Freeman L, Ganz ML. The Pediatric Alliance for Coordinated Care: Evaluation of a medical home model. Pediatrics. 2004;113(5):1507–16.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Rittenhouse DR, Shortell SM. The Patient-Centered Medical Home: Will It Stand the Test of Health Reform? J Am Med Assoc. 2009;301:2038–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Nutting PA, Miller WL, Crabtree BF, Jaen CR, Stewart EE, Stange KC. Initial Lessons From the First National Demonstration Project on Practice Transformation to a Patient-Centered Medical Home. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7:254–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Goroll AH, Berenson RA, Schoenbaum SC, Gardner LB. Fundamental reform of payment for adult primary care: comprehensive payment for comprehensive care. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22(3):410–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Merrell K, Berenson RA. Structuring payment for medical homes. Health Aff. 2010;29:852–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Wu WN, Bliss G, Bliss EB, Green LA. Practice profile. A direct primary care medical home: the Qliance experience. Health Aff. 2010;29(5):959–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Berenson RA, Rich EC. How to buy a medical home? Policy options and practical questions. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:619–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stange KC, Nutting PA, Miller WL, et al. Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):601–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Pham HH. Good neighbors: how will the patient-centered medical home relate to the rest of the health-care delivery system? J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):630–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bitton A, Martin C, Landon BE. A nationwide survey of patient centered medical home demonstration projects. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):584–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Rosenthal TC. The Medical Home: Growing Evidence to Support a New Approach to Primary Care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21:427–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hauer KE, Durning SJ, Kernan WN, et al. Factors Associated With Medical Students' Career Choices Regarding Internal Medicine. J Am Med Assoc. 2008;300(10):1154–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. DeVoe JE, Graham A, Krois L, Smith J, Fairbrother GL. "Mind the gap" in children's health insurance coverage: does the length of a child’s coverage gap matter? Ambul Pediatr. 2008;8(2):129–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. DeVoe J, Saultz J, Tillotson C, Krois L. A medical home versus temporary housing: the importance of a stable usual source of care among low-income children. Pediatrics. 2009;124:1363–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Smith M, Bartell J. Changes in usual source of care and perceptions of health care access, quality, and use. Med Care. 2004;42(10):975–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Phillips RL, Dodoo MS, Green LA, et al. Usual source of care: an important source of variation in health care spending. Health Aff. 2009;28(2):567–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We also wish to acknowledge the thousands of individuals who participated in the MEPS.

Funding Sources

This project was directly supported by grants 1 K08 HS16181 and 1 R01 HS018569 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the Oregon Health & Science University Department of Medicine. This publication received indirect support, from the Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute (OCTRI), grant number UL1 RR024140 from the National Center for Research Resources (NCRR), a component of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and NIH Roadmap for Medical Research.

These funding agencies had no involvement in the design and conduct of the study; analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. AHRQ collects and manages the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey.

Presentations

An abstract with similar findings was presented at the North American Primary Care Research Group Annual Meeting in Seattle, Washington, November 2010.

Conflicts of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer E. DeVoe MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

DeVoe, J.E., Tillotson, C.J., Lesko, S.E. et al. The Case for Synergy Between a Usual Source of Care and Health Insurance Coverage. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 1059–1066 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1666-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1666-0

KEY WORDS

Navigation