Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development of a Safety Net Medical Home Scale for Clinics

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Existing tools to measure patient-centered medical home (PCMH) adoption are not designed for research evaluation in safety-net clinics.

Objective

Develop a scale to measure PCMH adoption in safety-net clinics.

Research Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Subjects

Sixty-five clinics in five states.

Main Measures

Fifty-two-item Safety Net Medical Home Scale (SNMHS). The total score ranges from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) and is an average of multiple subscales (0–100): Access and Communication, Patient Tracking and Registry, Care Management, Test and Referral Tracking, Quality Improvement, and External Coordination. The scale was tested for internal consistency reliability and tested for convergent validity using The Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC) and the Patient-Centered Medical Home Assessment (PCMH-A). The scale was applied to centers in the sample. In addition, linear regression models were used to measure the association between clinic characteristics and medical home adoption.

Results

The SNMHS had high internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.84). The SNMHS score correlated moderately with the ACIC score (r = 0.64, p < 0.0001) and the PCMH-A (r = 0.56, p < 0.001). The mean SNMHS score was 61 ± SD 13. Among the subscales, External Coordination (66 ± 16) and Access and Communication (65 ± 14) had the highest mean scores, while Quality Improvement (55 ± 17) and Care Management (55 ± 16) had lower mean scores. Clinic characteristics positively associated with total SNMHS score were having more providers (β 15.8 95% CI 8.1–23.4 >8 provider FTEs compared to <4 FTEs) and participation in financial incentive programs (β 8.4 95% 1.6–15.3).

Conclusion

The SNMHS demonstrated reliability and convergent validity for measuring PCMH adoption in safety-net clinics. Some clinics have significant PCMH adoption. However, room for improvement exists in most domains, especially for clinics with fewer providers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Rosenthal TC. The medical home: growing evidence to support a new approach to primary care. J Am Board Fam Med. 2008;21(5):427–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. HRSA. 2009 National Total Summary Data. http://bphc.hrsa.gov/healthcenterdatastatistics/nationaldata/2009/2009nattotsumdata.html. Accessed June 5, 2011.

  3. Adashi EY, Geiger HJ, Fine MD. Health care reform and primary care–the growing importance of the community health center. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2047–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Federally Qualified Health Center Advanced Primary Care Practice Demonstration. http://www.cms.gov/demoprojectsevalrpts/md/itemdetail.asp?itemid=CMS1230557. Accessed June 5, 2011.

  5. Reid RJ, Fishman PA, Yu O, et al. Patient-centered medical home demonstration: a prospective, quasi-experimental, before and after evaluation. Am J Manag Care. 2009;15(9):e71–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nutting PA, Crabtree BF, Stewart EE, et al. Effect of facilitation on practice outcomes in the National Demonstration Project model of the patient-centered medical home. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(Suppl 1):S33–44. S92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stange KC, Nutting PA, Miller WL, et al. Defining and measuring the patient-centered medical home. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):601–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Berenson RA, Hammons T, Gans DN, et al. A house is not a home: keeping patients at the center of practice redesign. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(5):1219–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flottemesch TJ, Fontaine P, Asche SE, Solberg LI. Relationship of clinic medical home scores to health care costs. J Ambul Care Manage. 2011;34(1):78–89.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Solberg LI, Asche SE, Fontaine P, Flottemesch TJ, Pawlson LG, Scholle SH. Relationship of clinic medical home scores to quality and patient experience. J Ambul Care Manage. 2011;34(1):57–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. National Committee for Quality Assurance Physician Practice Connection-Research. Obtained by e-mail from Sarah Scholle PhD 3/9/2011.

  12. Patient Centered Medical Home Assessment. http://www.qhmedicalhome.org/safety-net/upload/PCHM-A_SNMHI_092710.pdf.

  13. Doty M, Abrams M, Hernandez S, Stemikis K, Beal A. Enhancing the capacity of community health centers to achieve high performance: findings from the 2009 Commonwealth Fund National Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers May 27, 2010.

  14. Coleman K, Phillips K. Providing underserved patients with medical homes: assessing the readiness of safety-net health centers. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2010;85:1.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Calvo A, Rainsford B, Bezold C. Comprehensive Health Homes: Using the Expanded Care Model of the HRSA Health Disparities Collaboratives. Am J Public Health. In press

  16. The Safety Net Medical Home Initiative. http://www.qhmedicalhome.org/safety-net/index.cfm.

  17. Change Concepts for Practice Transformation. Accessed June 5, 2011. http://www.qhmedicalhome.org/safety-net/change-concepts.cfm.

  18. National Qualty ForumTM-Endorsed Definition And Framework For Measuring Care Coordination 2006.

  19. DesRoches CM, Campbell EG, Rao SR, et al. Electronic health records in ambulatory care–a national survey of physicians. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(1):50–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shields AE, Shin P, Leu MG, et al. Adoption of health information technology in community health centers: results of a national survey. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(5):1373–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. The Commonwealth Fund 2009 Survey of Health Clinics Involved in the Safety Net Medical Home Initiative. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/Innovations/Tools/2011/~/media/Files/Innovations/CMWF_SurveyFinal722.pdf.

  22. National Committee for Quality Assurance: Physician Practice Connections-Patient-Centered Medical Home Standard and Guidelines. Washington, DC. 2008.

  23. National Committee for Quality Assurance: Standards for the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) 2011. http://www.ncqa.org/Portals/0/Programs/Recognition/2011PCMHbrochure_web.pdf.

  24. Safety Net Medical Home Scale (SNMHS) with Exact Questions and Scoring Algorithm. http://www.commonwealthfund.org/Content/Innovations/Tools/2011/~/media/Files/Innovations/Safety%20Net%20Medical%20Home%20ScaleFinal722.pdf.

  25. Sidorov JE. The patient-centered medical home for chronic illness: is it ready for prime time? Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(5):1231–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonomi AE, Wagner EH, Glasgow RE, VonKorff M. Assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC): a practical tool to measure quality improvement. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(3):791–820.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Cook NL, Hicks LS, O'Malley AJ, Keegan T, Guadagnoli E, Landon BE. Access to specialty care and medical services in community health centers. Health Aff (Millwood). 2007;26(5):1459–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. HRSA. Health Resources and Services Administration: Health Center Program. http://bphc.hrsa.gov/about/. Accessed June 5, 2011.

  29. Doty M, Abrams M, Hernandez S, Stemikis K, Beal A. Enhancing the capacity of community health centers to achieve high performance: findings from the 2009 Commonwealth Fund National Survey of Federally Qualified Health Centers May 27, 2010 2010.

  30. Friedberg MW, Coltin KL, Safran DG, Dresser M, Schneider EC. Medical home capabilities of primary care practices that serve sociodemographically vulnerable neighborhoods. Arch Intern Med. 2010;170(11):938–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rittenhouse DR, Casalino LP, Gillies RR, Shortell SM, Lau B. Measuring the medical home infrastructure in large medical groups. Health Aff (Millwood). 2008;27(5):1246–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Friedberg MW, Safran DG, Coltin KL, Dresser M, Schneider EC. Readiness for the Patient-Centered Medical Home: structural capabilities of Massachusetts primary care practices. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(2):162–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Goldberg DG, Kuzel AJ. Elements of the patient-centered medical home in family practices in Virginia. Ann Fam Med. 2009;7(4):301–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ferrante JM, Balasuramanian BA, Hudson SV, Crabtree BF. Principles of the patient-centered medical home and preventive services delivery. Ann Fam Med. 2010;8(2):108–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Abrams M, Schor EL, Schoenbaum S. How physician practices could share personnel and resources to support medical homes. Health Aff (Millwood). 2010;29(6):1194–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Landon BE, Gill JM, Antonelli RC, Rich EC. Using evidence to inform policy: developing a policy-relevant research agenda for the patient-centered medical home. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):581–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rittenhouse DR, Thom DH, Schmittdiel JA. Developing a policy-relevant research agenda for the patient-centered medical home: a focus on outcomes. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25(6):593–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Contributors

The authors thank Qualis Health and the MacColl Institute for Healthcare Innovation at the Group Health Research Institute for sharing the following data that was collected from clinics: the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care, PCMH-A, and the clinic demographics. The authors also thank David Stevens, MD, Director for Quality at the National Association of Community Health Centers for his review of the manuscript, and Kenneth Rasinski, PhD, for his advice and guidance on scale development.

Funders

This project was supported by the Commonwealth Fund, a national, private foundation based in New York City that supports independent research on health care issues and makes grants to improve health care practice and policy. The views presented here are those of the author and not necessarily those of The Commonwealth Fund, its directors, officers, or staff. Dr. Birnberg is supported by a Postdoctoral Fellowship in Health Services Research AHRQ T32- 5T32 HS00084-12. Dr. Chin is supported by a Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24 DK071933) and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Diabetes Research and Training Center (P60 DK20595).

Prior Presentations

Dr. Birnberg has presented this material at the Society of General Internal Medicine Annual Meeting Minneapolis, MN, April 2010 and Phoenix, AZ, May 2011.

Conflict of Interest

Dr. Birnberg reports acting as a consultant for Engaged Health Solutions LLC, a worksite wellness company. Dr. Huang reports acting as a consultant for the National Changing Diabetes Program of Novo Nordisk in 2008. Marshall Chin is the principal Investigator (Multiple PI with Monica Peek, MD, MPH) for Improving Diabetes Care and Outcomes on the South Side of Chicago, funded by the Merck Company Foundation ($1,818,179). The Merck Company Foundation, is a US-based, private charitable foundation. Established in 1957 by Merck & Co., Inc., a global research-driven pharmaceutical company, the Foundation is funded entirely by the company and is Merck's chief source of funding support to qualified non-profit, charitable organizations. The mission of the Foundation is to support organizations and innovative programs that: expand access to medicines, vaccines, and quality health care; build capacity in the biomedical and health sciences; promote environments that encourage innovation, economic growth, and development in a fair and ethical context; and support communities where Merck has a major presence. Since its inception, The Merck Company Foundation has contributed more than US$420 million to support important initiatives that address societal needs and are consistent with Merck's overall mission to enhance the health and well-being of people around the world. All other authors report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan M. Birnberg MD.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 92kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Birnberg, J.M., Drum, M.L., Huang, E.S. et al. Development of a Safety Net Medical Home Scale for Clinics. J GEN INTERN MED 26, 1418–1425 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1767-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1767-9

KEY WORDS

Navigation