Skip to main content
Log in

Patient, Primary Care Physician and Specialist Expectations of Primary Care Physician Involvement in Cancer Care

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In Canada, many health authorities recommend that primary care physicians (PCP) stay involved throughout their patients’ cancer journey to increase continuity of care. Few studies have focused on patient and physician expectations regarding PCP involvement in cancer care.

Objective

To compare lung cancer patient, PCP and specialist expectations regarding PCP involvement in coordination of care, emotional support, information transmission and symptom relief at the different phases of cancer.

Design

Canadian survey of lung cancer patients, PCPs and cancer specialists

Participants

A total of 395 patients completed questionnaires on their expectations regarding their PCP participation in several aspects of care, at different phases of their cancer. Also, 45 specialists and 232 community-based PCP involved in these patients’ care responded to a mail survey on the same aspects of cancer care.

Results

Most specialists did not expect participation of the PCP in coordination of care in the diagnosis and treatment phases (65% and 78% respectively), in contrast with patients (83% and 85%) and PCPs (80% and 59%) (p < 0.0001). At these same phases, the best agreement among the 3 groups was around PCP role in emotional support: 84% and more of all groups had this expectation. PCP participation in symptom relief was another shared expectation, but more unanimously at the treatment phase (p = 0.85). In the advanced phase, most specialists expect a major role of PCP in all aspects of care (from 81% to 97%). Patients and PCP agree with them mainly for emotional support and information transmission.

Conclusion

Lung cancer patient, PCP and specialist expectations regarding PCP role differ with the phase of cancer and the specific aspect of cancer care. There is a need to reach a better agreement among them and to better define PCP role, in order to achieve more collaborative and integrated cancer care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Oeffinger KC, Oeffinger KC, McCabe MS. Models for delivering survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(32):5117–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Norman A, Sisler J, Hack T, Harlos M. Family physicians and cancer care. Palliative Care Patients’ Perspectives. Can Fam Phys. 2001;47:2009–16.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aubin M, Vézina L, Allard P, Bergeron R, Lemieux A-P. Les soins palliatifs: profil de pratique des médecins de famille de la région de Québec. Can Fam Phys. 2001;47:1999–2004.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Anvik T, Holtedahl KA, Mikalsen H. “When patients have cancer, they stop seeing me”- the role of the general practitioner in early follow-up of patients with cancer – a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract. 2006;7:19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sisler JJ, Belle Brown J, Stewart M. Family physicians’ role in cancer care. Can Fam Phys. 2004;50:889–96.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Worster A, Wood ML, McWhinney IR, Bass MJ. Who provides follow-up care for patients with early breast cancer ? Can Fam Phys. 1995;41:1314–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Worster A, Bass MJ, Wood ML. Willingness to follow breast cancer: survey of family physicians. Can Fam Phys. 1996;42:263–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Wood ML, McWilliam C. Cancer in remission: Challenge in collaboration for family physicians and oncologists. Can Fam Phys. 1996;42:899–910.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gouvernement du Canada. Rapport du sous-comité de mise à jour de « de la vie et de la mort » du comité des affaires sociales. Des soins de fin de vie de qualité : chaque canadien et canadienne y a droit. 2000.

  10. Lambert P, Lecomte M. Le citoyen : une personne du début à la fin de sa vie. Association québécoise des soins palliatifs. 2000.

  11. Gouvernement du Québec. Rapport du Comité consultatif sur le cancer. Programme québécois de lutte contre le cancer, pour lutter efficacement contre le cancer, formons équipe. Gouvernement du Québec, 1997.

  12. Bauer J, Leyvraz S. Les liaisons dangereuses: interactions entre médecins de premier recours et oncologues médicaux. Rev med Suisse. 2005;1:1356–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Dworkind M, Shvartzman P, Adler PSJ. Urban family physicians and the care of cancer patients. Can Fam Phys. 1994;40:47–50.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barnes EA, Hanson J, Neumann CM, Nekolaichuk CL, Bruera E. Communication between primary care physicians and radiation oncologists regarding patients with cancer treated with palliative radiotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(15):2902–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Jarrett NJ, Payne SA, Wiles RA. Terminally ill patients’and lay-carers’ perceptions and experiences of community-based services. J Adv Nurs. 1999;48:476–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sangster JF, Gerace TM, Hoddinott SN. Family physicians’ perspective of patient care at the London Regional Cancer Clinic. Can Fam Phys. 1987;33:71–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. McWhinney IR, Hoddinott SN, Bass MJ, Gay K, Shearer R. Role of the family physician in the care of cancer patients. Can Fam Phys. 1990;36:2183–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wood ML. Communication between cancer specialists and family doctors. Can Fam Phys. 1993;39:49–57.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. William PT. The role of the family physician in the management of cancer patients. J Cancer Educ. 1994;9(2):67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Starfield B. Primary Care: Balancing Health Needs, Services, and Technology, Revised ed.. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Donaldson MS, Yordy KD, Lohr KN, Vanselow NA, eds. Primary Care: America’s Health in a New Era. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McWhinney IR, Freeman T. Textbook of Family Medicine. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  23. The College of Family Physicians of Canada. Declaration of Commitment, November 2004.http://www.cfpc.ca/uploadedFiles/Resources/Resource_Items/FAMILY_MEDICINE_IN_CANADA_English.pdf (Accessed June 06, 2011)

  24. Institute of Medicine, National Research Council. In: Adler NE, Page AEK, eds. Cancer Care for the Whole Patient: Meeting Psychosocial Health Needs. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Smith GF, Toonen TR. Primary Care of the Patient with Cancer. Am Fam Phys. 2007;75:1207–14.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cancer Australia. CanNET: Cancer service networks national demonstration program. Canberra: Cancer Australia, 2008. Available at: www.canceraustralia.gov.au/ (Accessed June 06, 2011)

  27. Grunfeld E, Levine MN, Julian JA, et al. Randomized trial of long term follow-up for early-stage breast cancer: a comparison of family physician versus specialist care. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:845–55.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Guadagnoli E, Winer EP, Ayanian JZ. Surveillance testing among survivors of early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:1074–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Snyder CF, Earle CC, Herbert RJ, Neville BA, Blackford A, Frick KD. Trends in follow-up and preventive care for colorectal cancer survivors. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:254–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Del Giudice ME, Grunfeld E, Harvey BJ, Piliotis E, Verna S. Primary Care Physicians’ Views of Routine Follow-Up care of Cancer Survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3338–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cheung WY, Neville BA, Cameron DB, Cook EF, Earle CC. Comparisons of Patient and Physician Expectations for Cancer Survivorhsip Care. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:2489–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Nissen MJ, Beran MS, Lee MW, Mehta SR, Pine DA, Swenson KK. Views of Primary Care Providers on Follow-up of Cancer Patients. Fam Med. 2007;39:477–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gorman DR, Mackinnon H, Storrie M, Wilson GS, Parker S. The general practice perspective on cancer services in Lothian. J Fam Pract. 2000;17:323–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Dagada C, Mathoulin-Pélissier S, Monnereau A, Hoerni B. Management of cancer patients by general practitioners. Results of a survey among 422 physicians in Aquitaine. Presse Médicale. 2003;32(23):1060–5.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Dworkind M, Towers A, Murnaghan D, Guibert R, Iverson D. Communication between family physicians and oncologists: qualitative results of an exploratory study. Cancer prevention and control. 1999;3(2):137–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Johansson B, Glimelius B, Sjoden PO. Home care for elderly cancer patients. More intensive follow-up and home services reduce the need of specialist care. Lakartidningen. 2003;100(17):1524–1526–1529–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hickner J, Kent S, Naragon P, Hunt L. Physicians’ and patients’ views of cancer care by family physicians: A report from the American Academy of Family Physicians National Research Network. Fam Med. 2007;39:126–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Bowling A. Measuring Disease: A review of disease-specific quality of life measurement scales. Buckingham, Philadeplphia: Open University press; 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schag CC, Heinrich RL, Ganz PA. Karnofsky performance status revisited: Reliability, validity and guidelines. J Clin Oncology. 1984;2:187–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Taylor EA, Olver IN, Sivanthan T, Chi M, Purnell C. Observer error in grading performance status in cancer patients. Supportive Care in cancer. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Safran DG, Kosinski M, Alvin R, et al. The primary care assessment survey.Tests of date quality and measurement performance. Medical Care. 1998;36(5):728–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Leiyu S, Starfield B, Jiahong X. Validating the adult primary care assessment tool. Fam Pract. 2001;50(2):161–75.

    Google Scholar 

  43. College of Family Physicians of Canada. 2004 National physician Survey. Available at: http://www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/nps/results/PDF-e/FP/Questionnaire/NPS_FP_questionnaire-04.pdf (Accessed June 06, 2011).

  44. College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Medical Association, Royal college of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada: 2007 National Physician Survey (NPS): National Results by PCP/GP or Other Specialist, Sex, Age and all Physicians. Available at: http://www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/nps/2007_Survey/Results/ENG/National/pdf/Q11/Q11_Core.only.pdf (Accessed June 06, 2011)

  45. College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Medical Association, Royal college of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada: 2007 National Physician Survey (NPS): National Results by PCP/GP or Other Specialist, Sex, Age and all Physicians. Available at: http://www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/nps/2007_Survey/Results/ENG/Provincial/pdf/Prov.to.Can/Q28/Q28bi_combined.pdf (Accessed June 06, 2011)

  46. College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Medical Association, Royal college of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada: 2007 National Physician Survey (NPS): National Results by PCP/GP or Other Specialist, Sex, Age and all Physicians. Available at: http://www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/nps/2007_Survey/Results/ENG/Specialty/pdf/Clinical-Internal/Q11/Q11_Core.only.pdf (Accessed June 06, 2011)

  47. College of Family Physicians of Canada, Canadian Medical Association, Royal college of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada: 2007 National Physician Survey (NPS): National Results by PCP/GP or Other Specialist, Sex, Age and all Physicians. Available at: http://www.nationalphysiciansurvey.ca/nps/2007_Survey/Results/ENG/Specialty/pdf/Surgical/Q11/Q11_Core.only.pdf (Accessed June 06, 2011)

  48. Klabunde CN, Ambs A, Keating NL, et al. The role of primary care physicians in cancer care. J Gen Intern Med. 2009;24(9):1029–36. Epub 2009 Jul 14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Sussman J, Baldwn LM. The interface of primary and oncology specialty care: from diagnosis through primary treatment. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 2010;40:18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Aubin M, Vézina L, Fillion L, et al. Impact of an educational program on pain management in patients with cancer living at home. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2006;33(6):1183–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by an operating grant of the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Grant MOP-68834.

The authors thank Mr Serge Simard, biostatistician, for his advices in data analyses and Mrs Lucie Misson and Danielle Marleau, for their role in patient interviewing and data collection.

Conflict of Interest

None disclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michèle Aubin MD, PhD, CCFP, FCFP.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aubin, M., Vézina, L., Verreault, R. et al. Patient, Primary Care Physician and Specialist Expectations of Primary Care Physician Involvement in Cancer Care. J GEN INTERN MED 27, 8–15 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1777-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1777-7

KEY WORDS

Navigation