Abstract
BACKGROUND
Breast pain is a common complaint to primary care and breast specialists. Literature recommends imaging to provide reassurance of benign etiology. The effect of imaging on reassurance and subsequent healthcare utilization has not been described.
OBJECTIVE
To determine if initial imaging for breast pain reduces subsequent utilization.
DESIGN
Retrospective cohort study at a hospital-based breast health practice.
PATIENTS
Women referred for breast pain from 2006–2009.
MAIN MEASURES
Imaging ordered at initial provider visit; clinical utilization, defined as the number of follow-up visits, diagnostic imaging studies, and biopsies completed within 12 months following initial visit.
KEY RESULTS
Sixty-percent of women were age 40 or younger, 87% were from racial/ethnic minority groups. Twenty-five percent had imaging ordered at initial visit. Of those who received initial imaging, 75% had normal radiographic findings, yet 98% returned for additional evaluation. In adjusted analyses, women with initial imaging had increased clinical services utilization (OR 25.4, 95% CI: 16.7, 38.6). Women with normal clinical breast exams who received initial imaging exhibited increased odds for subsequent clinical services utilization (OR 23.8, 95% CI: 12.9, 44.0). Six cancers were diagnosed; imaging in the absence of clinical breast exam abnormalities did not result in any cancer identification.
CONCLUSIONS
Initial imaging for women with breast pain increased the odds of subsequent clinical utilization and did not increase reassurance in ruling out malignancy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Millet AV, Dirbas FM. Clinical Management of Breast Pain: A Review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2002;57(7):451–61.
Ganschow P, Norlock F, Jacobs E, Marcus E. Breast health and vommon nreast problems: a practical approach. Philadelphia: American College of Physicians; 2004.
BeLieu R. Mastodynia. Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America. 1994;21(3):461–77.
Ader D, Browne M. Prevalence and impact of cyclic mastalgia in a United States clinic-based sample. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997;177:126–32.
Leinster SJ, Whitehouse GH, Walsh PV. Cyclical mastalgia: Clinical and mammographic observations in a screened population. Br J Surg. 1987;74(3):220–2.
Barton MB, Elmore JG, Fletcher SW. Breast Symptoms among Women Enrolled in a Health Maintenance Organization: Frequency, Evaluation, and Outcome. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130(8):651–7.
Lumachi F, Ermani M, Brandes AA, et al. Breast complaints and risk of breast cancer. Population-based study of 2,879 self-selected women and long-term follow-up. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002;56(2):88–92.
Smith RL, Pruthi S, Fitzpatrick LA. Evaluation and Management of Breast Pain. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004;79(3):353–72.
Duijm LEM, Guit GL, Hendriks JHCL, Zaat JOM, Mali WPTM. Value of breast imaging in women with painful breasts: observational follow up study. Br Med J. 1998;317(7171):1492–5.
Preece P, Baum M, Mansel R, et al. Importance of mastalgia in operable breast cancer. Br Med J (Clinical Research Edition). 1982;284(6325):1299–300.
Tumyan L, Hoyt AC, Bassett LW. Negative predictive value of sonography and mammography in patients with focal breast pain. Breast J. 2005;11(5):333–7.
Morrow M. The evaluation of common breast problems. Am Fam Physician. 2000;61(8):2371–8.
Ader DN, Shriver CD. Cyclical mastalgia: prevalence and impact in an outpatient breast clinic sample. J Am Coll Surg. 1997;185(5):466–70.
Brand IR, Sapherson DA, Brown TS. Breast imaging in women under 35 with symptomatic breast disease. The British Journal of Radiology. 1993;66(785):394–7.
Klimberg V. Etiology and management of breast pain. In: Harris J, Lippman M, Morrow M, Hellman S, eds. Diseases of the Breast, vol. 99-106. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996.
Stone MD, Norton S, Mendez JE, Hirsch E. Positive impact of a breast-health triaging system on breast-care access and physician satisfaction. Am J Surg. 2007;194(4):482–7.
Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC. Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States. Cancer. 2003;97(6):1528–40.
Chang S, Kerlikowske K, Napoles-Springer A, Posner S, Sickles E, PerezStable E. Racial differences in timeliness of follow-up after abnormal screening mammography. Cancer. 1996;78(7):1395–402.
Gwyn K, Bondy ML, Cohen DS, Lund MJ, Liff JM, Flagg EW, et al. Racial differences in diagnosis, treatment, and clinical delays in a population-based study of patients with newly diagnosed breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2004;100(8):1595–604.
Gross CP, Smith BD, Wolf E, Andersen M. Racial disparities in cancer therapy. Cancer. 2008;112(4):900–8.
Shavers VL, Brown ML. Racial and ethnic disparities in the receipt of cancer treatment. J Natl Canc Inst J Natl Canc Inst. 2002;94(5):334–57.
Kerin M, O'Hanlon D, Khalid A, Kent P, McCarthy P, Given H. Mammographic assessment of the symptomatic nonsuspicious breast. Am J Surg. 1997;173(3):181–4.
Hendee WR, Becker GJ, Borgstede JP, et al. Addressing overutilization in medical imaging. Radiology. 2010;257(1):240–5.
Levin DC, Rao VM. Turf wars in radiology: Other causes of overutilization and what can be done about it. J Am Coll Radiol. 2004;1(5):317–21.
McDonald IG, Daly J, Jelinek VM, Panetta F, Gutman JM. Opening Pandora's box: the unpredictability of reassurance by a normal test result. Br Med J. 1996;313(7053):329–32.
Fitzpatrick R. Telling patients there is nothing wrong. Br Med J. 1996;313(7053):311–2.
Screening for breast cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):I–44.
Lutfey KE, Link CL, Marceau LD, et al. Diagnostic certainty as a source of medical practice variation in coronary heart disease: results from a cross-national experiment of clinical decision making. Med Decis Making. 2009;29(5):606–18.
Balsa AI, Seiler N, McGuire TG, Bloche MG. Clinical uncertainty and healthcare disparities. Am J Law Med. 2003;29(207).
Lutfey KE, Link CL, Grant RW, Marceau LD, McKinlay JB. Is certainty more important than diagnosis for understanding race and gender disparities?: An experiment using coronary heart disease and depression case vignettes. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2009;89(3):279–87.
Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, et al. Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Canc Inst J Natl Canc Inst. 1989;81(24):1879–86.
Contributors
The authors thank Timothy C. Heeren, PhD, Boston University School of Public Health, for his input on statistical analyses and data presentation. No compensation was received.
Funding/Support
This publication was made possible by grant 05-2011-023 from the Avon Foundation Safety Net Funding Initiative Grant and grant KG101421 from the Susan G. Komen Foundation.
Role of the Sponsors
The funding organizations were not involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Howard, M.B., Battaglia, T., Prout, M. et al. The Effect of Imaging on the Clinical Management of Breast Pain. J GEN INTERN MED 27, 817–824 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1982-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-011-1982-4