Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Postoperative Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Patients do Not Remember Potential Complications

  • Published:
Obesity Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Background

Despite comprehensive preoperative education, patients may forget important information such as potential complications.

Methods

Patients who had undergone laparoscopic bariatric surgery were surveyed. All patients were asked to write down as many as possible of the potential complications. Preoperatively, patients had been given an educational book, two preoperative educational appointments, a test, and an informed consent discussion and form with clear presentation of complications which may occur.

Results

There were 70 patients in this investigation (75% response rate), with 49 laparoscopic gastric bypass patients (bypass), 18 laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding patients (band), and 3 patients who did not indicate their procedure. Patients listed an average of 5.1 complications. Complications were grouped in 12 categories for each procedure. Percentages reported by patients (bypass vs band) were: Death 34 (69%) vs 13 (72%), Injury to GI tract/leak 14 (29%) vs 5 (28%), Conversion 1 (2%) vs 0 (0%), CV/pulmonary issues 11 (22%) vs 4 (22%), Stenosis/ulcer 6 (12%) vs NA, Band erosion/migration NA vs 9 (50%), Malnutrition 24 (49%) vs 4 (22%), GI symptoms 19 (39%) vs 6 (33%), Infection 15 (31%) vs 10 (56%),Weight regain/inadequate loss 5 (10%) vs 3 (17%), Thromboembolic event 7 (14%) vs 3 (17%), and Hemorrhage 8 (16%) vs 0 (0%).

Conclusions

Many patients forget some of the serious complications after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. This may have important medicolegal consequences especially during malpractice lawsuits. These data underscore the need for continual followup and education in this patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Madan AK, Tichansky DS. Patients postoperatively forgot aspects of preoperative patient education. Obes Surg 2005;15: 1066–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ternovits CA, Tichansky DS, Madan AK. Band versus bypass: randomization and patients’ choices and perceptions. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2006; 2: 6–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Affleck PJ, Waisel DB, Cusick JM et al. Recall of risks following labor epidural analgesia. J Clin Anesth 1998; 10: 141–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Godwin Y. Do they listen? A review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53: 121–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Elfant AB, Korn C, Mendez L et al. Recall of informed consent after endoscopic procedures. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 1–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hutson MM, Blaha D. Patients’ recall of preoperative instruction for informed consent for an operation. J Bone Joint Surg 1991; 73: 160–2.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Priluck IA, Robertson DM, Buettner H. What patients recall of the preoperative discussion after retinal detachment surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1979; 87: 620–3.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pesudovs K, Luscombe CK, Coster DJ. Recall from informed consent counselling for cataract surgery. J Law Med 2006; 13: 496–504.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shurnas PS, Coughlin MJ. Recall of the risks of forefoot surgery after informed consent. Foot Ankle Int 2003; 24: 904–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Krupp W, Spanehl O, Laubach W et al. Informed consent in neurosurgery: patients’ recall of preoperative discussion. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2000; 142: 233–8; discussion 238–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown TF, Massoud E, Bance M. Informed consent in otologic surgery: prospective study of risk recall by patients and impact of written summaries of risk. J Otolaryngol 2003; 32: 368–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Layton S, Korsen J. Informed consent in oral and maxillofacial surgery: a study of the value of written warnings. Br J Oral Maxillofax Surg 1994; 32: 34–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Taddeucci RJ, Madan AK, Tichansky DS. Band vs bypass: Influence of an educational seminar and the surgeon visit on patient preference. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2007 (in press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Minimally Invasive Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA

    Atul K. Madan MD, FACS & David S. Tichansky MD, FACS

  2. Surgical Associates, PC, Lincoln, NE, USA

    Raymond J. Taddeucci MD

  3. Department of Surgery, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, 956 Court Avenue, Room G210, Memphis, TN, 38163, USA

    Atul K. Madan MD, FACS

Authors
  1. Atul K. Madan MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David S. Tichansky MD, FACS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Raymond J. Taddeucci MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atul K. Madan MD, FACS.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Madan, A.K., Tichansky, D.S. & Taddeucci, R.J. Postoperative Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery Patients do Not Remember Potential Complications. OBES SURG 17, 885–888 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9164-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-007-9164-5

Key words

Search

Navigation