Skip to main content
Log in

Natural ways are better: Adolescents and the ‘anti-obesity’ gene

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical research with young people in Finland, Germany, Spain and Britain was carried out as part of the BIOCULT project funded by the European Union. The project focused on their attitudes to biotechnology and, in particular, the formation of arguments about risk and safety. This paper looks at the responses of 14–18 year olds to a story about the so called anti-obesity gene, in the form of advice to a friend who is taking it. The majority advised against taking it with some differences by gender and country. Most reservations were on grounds of safety and the feeling that ‘natural’ ways to lose weight are better: A minority questioned the idea of striving for a ‘perfect’ body. The types of arguments used by the young people reveal underlying perspectives on the place of human beings in the world and whether they have a right to manipulate nature and their own bodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References and notes

  1. Macer, D. (1990) Shaping Genes, Eubios Ethics Institute

  2. Lyon, E. & Breakwell, G.M. (1994) Factors predicting environmental concern and indifference in 13–16 year olds. Environment and Behaviour 26 (2):223–238, p. 237.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society, Towards a new modernity, Sage Publications, London, p.21

    Google Scholar 

  4. ibid.,, p.22.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lemkow, L. (1993) Public Attitudes to Genetic Engineering: Some European Perspectives, The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin, Ireland; Young, K. (1991) Shades of Green, in: Jowell, R., Brook, L. & Taylor, B. (eds.) British Social Attitudes 8th Report 1991/1992, Dartmouth Publishing, England; Witherspoon, S. (1994) The Greening of Britain: romance and rationality, in: Jowell, R., Curtice, J., Brook, L. & Ahrendt, D. (eds.) British Social Attitudes 11th Report, pp.107–138.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mellor, M. (1992) Breaking the Boundaries, Towards a feminist green socialism, Virago Press, London, p.163.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eurobarometer 35.1 (1991) Biotechnology, INRA for the Commission of the European Communities.

  8. STOA (1992) Bioethics in Europe, Directorate General for Research, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lemkow (1993) op. cit., p. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bunton, R. & Burrows, S. (1995) Consumption and health in the ‘epidemiological’ clinic of late modern medicine, in: Bunton, R., Nettleton, S. & Burrows, R. (eds.) (1995) The sociology of health promotion, Routledge, London, chap. 16, p. 212.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Freund, P.S. & McGuire, M.B. (1991) Health, Illness and the Social Body, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA, p. 48.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goffman, E. (1968) Stigma. Notes on the management of spoiled identity. Penguin, London; Scheff, T.J. (1966) Being mentally ill. A sociological theory, Aldine Publishing. New York, chap. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  13. These figures were based on the young person’s reporting of fathers’ occupation (see reference 9).

  14. O’Brien M. (1995) Health and lifestyle. A critical mess? Notes on the dedifferentiation of health, in: Bunton, Nettleton and Burrows (1995) op. cit., chap. 15.

  15. Foucault, M. (1990) The History of Sexuality, Vol. 1, Vintage Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Marie Levitt is a sociologist with research interests in attitudes and values in relation to biotechnology, health and religion.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levitt, M. Natural ways are better: Adolescents and the ‘anti-obesity’ gene. SCI ENG ETHICS 3, 305–315 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0037-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-997-0037-z

Keywords

Navigation