Skip to main content
Log in

Joint Congruency as an Indication for Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

Long-term results of periacetabular osteotomy for advanced-stage osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip are reportedly unsatisfactory compared with results for early-stage osteoarthritis. Other preoperative information that can be used to determine indications for periacetabular osteotomy is therefore important to avoid performing osteotomy in young patients with advanced-stage osteoarthritis who would not likely achieve substantial benefit. We retrospectively reviewed 47 patients (49 hips) with advanced-stage osteoarthritis who underwent rotational acetabular osteotomy (RAO) using preoperative congruency in abduction. The minimum postoperative followup was 8 years (mean, 12.3 years; range, 8–20 years) and mean age at surgery was 43.1 years (range, 30–59 years). At followup, osteoarthritic stage was improved in 12 hips, unchanged in 24 hips, and had progressed in 13 hips. Preoperative joint congruency in abduction was good in 13 hips, poor in 32 hips, and narrowed in four hips. Patients with better congruency in abduction had better results. We believe osteoarthritis with good congruency in abduction preoperatively remains a good indication for RAO even in advanced stages of disease.

Level of Evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2A–D
Fig. 3A–D

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Clohisy JC, Nunley RM, Curry MC, Schoenecker PL. Periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of acetabular dysplasia associated with major aspherical femoral head deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1417–1423.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Eppright RH. Dial osteotomy of the acetabulum in the treatment of dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975;57:1172.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ganz R, Klaue K, Vinh TS, Mast JW. A new periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasias: technique and preliminary results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;232:26–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hasegawa Y, Iwata H, Mizuno M, Genda E, Sato S, Miura T. The natural course of osteoarthritis of the hip due to subluxation or acetabular dysplasia. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1992;111:187–191.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hasegawa Y, Masui T, Yamaguchi J, Kawabe K, Suzuki S. Factors leading to osteoarthritis after eccentric rotational acetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:207–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Heyman CH, Herndon CH. Legg-Perthes disease: a method for the measurement of the roentgenographic result. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1950;32:767–768.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ito H, Matsuno T, Minami A. Rotational acetabular osteotomy through an Ollier lateral u approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;459:200–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kanai H, Takatori Y, Umeyama T, Nakamura S, Morimoto S, Ninomiya S. Rotational acetabular osteotomy for the treatment of dysplastic hips with end-stage osteoarthrosis: a biological alternative to total hip arthroplasty? Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999;119:376–379.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kralj M, Mavcic B, Antolic V, Iglic A, Kralj-Iglic V. The Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: clinical, radiographic and mechanical 7–15-year follow-up of 26 hips. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:833–840.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsui M, Masuhara K, Nakata K, Nishii T, Sugano N, Ochi T. Early deterioration after modified rotational acetabular osteotomy for the dysplastic hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1997;79:220–224.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayo KA, Trumble SJ, Mast JW. Results of periacetabular osteotomy in patients with previous surgery for hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:73–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Merle d’Aubigne R, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954;36:451–475.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nakamura S, Ninomiya S, Takatori Y, Morimoto S, Umeyama T. Long-term outcome of rotational acetabular osteotomy: 145 hips followed for 10–23 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69:259–265.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ninomiya S, Tagawa H. Rotational acetabular osteotomy for the dysplastic hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1984;66:430–436.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Nozawa M, Shitoto K, Matsuda K, Maezawa K, Kurosawa H. Rotational acetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia: a follow-up for more than ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002;84:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Okano K, Enomoto H, Osaki M, Shindo H. Rotational acetabular osteotomy for advanced osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90:23–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Peters CL, Erickson JA, Hines JL. Early results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy: the learning curve at an academic medical center. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1920–1926.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schramm M, Hohmann D, Radespiel-Troger M, Pitto RP. Treatment of the dysplastic acetabulum with Wagner spherical osteotomy: a study of patients followed for a minimum of twenty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:808–814.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Schramm M, Pitto RP, Bar K, Meyer M, Rohm E, Hohmann D. Prophylaxis of secondary osteoarthrosis with spherical osteotomy in residual acetabular dysplasia: analysis of predictive factors of success. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999;119:418–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sharp IK. Acetabular dysplasia: the acetabular angle. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1961;43:268–272.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shimogaki K, Yasunaga Y, Ochi M. A histological study of articular cartilage after rotational acetabular osteotomy for hip dysplasia. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:1019–1023.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Siebenrock KA, Scholl E, Lottenbach M, Ganz R. Bernese periacetabular osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999;363:9–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Steel HH. Triple osteotomy of the innominate bone. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1973;55:343–350.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Takatori Y, Ninomiya S, Nakamura S, Morimoto S, Moro T, Nagai I. Long-term results of rotational acetabular osteotomy in young patients with advanced osteoarthrosis of the hip. J Orthop Sci. 2000;5:336–341.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Takatori Y, Ninomiya S, Nakamura S, Morimoto S, Moro T, Nagai I, Mabuchi A. Long-term results of rotational acetabular osteotomy in patients with slight narrowing of the joint space on preoperative radiographic findings. J Orthop Sci. 2001;6:137–140.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Trousdale RT, Cabanela ME. Lessons learned after more than 250 periacetabular osteotomies. Acta Orthop Scand. 2003;74:119–126.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. von Rosen S. Diagnosis and treatment of congenital dislocation of the hip joint in the new-born. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1962;44:284–291.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trousdale RT, Ekkernkamp A, Ganz R, Wallrichs SL. Periacetabular and intertrochanteric osteotomy for the treatment of osteoarthrosis in dysplastic hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77:73–85.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetabula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint: with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand. 1939;58:28–38.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Yasunaga Y, Ikuta Y, Kanazawa T, Takahashi K, Hisatome T. The state of the articular cartilage at the time of surgery as an indication for rotational acetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1001–1004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Yasunaga Y, Ochi M, Terayama H, Tanaka R, Yamasaki T, Ishii Y. Rotational acetabular osteotomy for advanced osteoarthritis secondary to dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:1915–1919.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yasunaga Y, Takahashi K, Ochi M, Ikuta Y, Hisatome T, Nakashiro J, Yamamoto S. Rotational acetabular osteotomy in patients forty-six years of age or older: comparison with younger patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:266–272.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Katsuro Iwasaki, Dr. Kenji Yamada, and Dr. Katsuro Takahashi for assistance and advice concerning RAO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kunihiko Okano MD, PhD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research.

About this article

Cite this article

Okano, K., Enomoto, H., Osaki, M. et al. Joint Congruency as an Indication for Rotational Acetabular Osteotomy. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 894–900 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0443-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0443-9

Keywords

Navigation