Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Open versus Two Forms of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

There have been technologic advances in the methods for repairing torn rotator cuffs. We compared the clinical and structural outcomes of three different forms of rotator cuff repair with up to 24 months’ followup. We wished to assess how surgical technique affected clinical outcomes and see how these correlated to repair integrity. Three cohorts of patients had repair of a symptomatic rotator cuff tear using (1) an open technique (n = 49); (2) arthroscopic knotted (n = 53); or (3) arthroscopic knotless (n = 57) by one surgeon. Standardized patient- and examiner-determined outcomes were obtained preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 and 6 months, and 2 years postoperatively. Ultrasound studies were performed with a validated protocol at 6 months and 2 years postsurgery. Clinical outcomes were similar with the exception that the arthroscopic groups had, on average, 20% better American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores than the open group at 6 months and 2 years. Retear correlated with tear size and operation time and occurred more frequently after open repair (39%) than after arthroscopic knotted (25%) and arthroscopic knotless (16%) repair. An intact cuff on ultrasound corresponded to better results for supraspinatus strength, patient outcomes, and rotator cuff functional ability.

Level of Evidence: Level III, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1A–D
Fig. 2A–C
Fig. 3A–B
Fig. 4A–C

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson K, Boothby M, Aschenbrener D, van Holsbeeck M. Outcome and structural integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using 2 rows of fixation: minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1899–1905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop J, Klepps S, Lo IK, Bird J, Gladstone JN, Flatow EL. Cuff integrity after arthroscopic versus open rotator cuff repair: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006;15:290–299.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boileau P, Brassart N, Watkinson DJ, Carles M, Hatzidakis AM, Krishnan SG. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the supraspinatus: does the tendon really heal? J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1229–1240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bryant L, Shnier R, Bryant C, Murrell GA. A comparison of clinical estimation, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and arthroscopy in determining the size of rotator cuff tears. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:219–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Calvert PT, Packer NP, Stoker DJ, Bayley JI, Kessel L. Arthrography of the shoulder after operative repair of the torn rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986;68:147–150.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cummins CA, Murrell GA. Mode of failure for rotator cuff repair with suture anchors identified at revision surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12:128–133.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fealy S, Adler RS, Drakos MC, Kelly AM, Allen AA, Cordasco FA, Warren RF, O’Brien SJ. Patterns of vascular and anatomical response after rotator cuff repair. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:120–127.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fealy S, Kingham TP, Altchek DW. Mini-open rotator cuff repair using a two-row fixation technique: outcomes analysis in patients with small, moderate, and large rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2002;18:665–670.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Franceschi F, Ruzzini L, Longo UG, Martina FM, Zobel BB, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Equivalent clinical results of arthroscopic single-row and double-row suture anchor repair for rotator cuff tears: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35:1254–1260.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fuchs B, Gilbart MK, Hodler J, Gerber C. Clinical and structural results of open repair of an isolated one-tendon tear of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:309–316.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, Middleton WD, Yamaguchi K. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86:219–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Galatz LM, Griggs S, Cameron BD, Iannotti JP. Prospective longitudinal analysis of postoperative shoulder function: a ten-year follow-up study of full-thickness rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83:1052–1056.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gartsman GM, Hammerman SM. Full-thickness tears: arthroscopic repair. Orthop Clin North Am. 1997;28:83–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gartsman GM, Khan M, Hammerman SM. Arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:832–840.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hashimoto T, Nobuhara K, Hamada T. Pathologic evidence of degeneration as a primary cause of rotator cuff tear. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;415:111–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hayes K, Ginn KA, Walton JR, Szomor ZL, Murrell GA. A randomised clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of physiotherapy after rotator cuff repair. Aust J Physiother. 2004;50:77–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZR, Murrell GA. Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. Aust J Physiother. 2001;47:289–294.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZL, Murrell GA. Reliability of 3 methods for assessing shoulder strength. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:33–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ide J, Maeda S, Takagi K. A comparison of arthroscopic and open rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1090–1098.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C, Switzerland Z. Clinical outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:304–314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jost B, Zumstein M, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C. Long-term outcome after structural failure of rotator cuff repairs. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:472–479.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Klepps S, Bishop J, Lin J, Cahlon O, Strauss A, Hayes P, Flatow EL. Prospective evaluation of the effect of rotator cuff integrity on the outcome of open rotator cuff repairs. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1716–1722.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lafosse L, Brozska R, Toussaint B, Gobezie R. The outcome and structural integrity of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with use of the double-row suture anchor technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:1533–1541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Liem D, Bartl C, Lichtenberg S, Magosch P, Habermeyer P. Clinical outcome and tendon integrity of arthroscopic versus mini-open supraspinatus tendon repair: a magnetic resonance imaging-controlled matched-pair analysis. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:514–521.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. L’Insalata JC, Warren RF, Cohen SB, Altchek DW, Peterson MG. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79:738–748.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Matthews TJ, Hand GC, Rees JL, Athanasou NA, Carr AJ. Pathology of the torn rotator cuff tendon: reduction in potential for repair as tear size increases. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:489–495.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Murray TF Jr, Lajtai G, Mileski RM, Snyder SJ. Arthroscopic repair of medium to large full-thickness rotator cuff tears: outcome at 2- to 6-year follow-up. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11:19–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nho SJ, Yadav H, Pensak M, Dodson CC, Good CR, MacGillivray JD. Biomechanical fixation in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:94–102, 102 e101.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Osbahr DC, Murrell GA. The rotator cuff functional index. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:956–960.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park MC, Tibone JE, ElAttrache NS, Ahmad CS, Jun BJ, Lee TQ. Part II: Biomechanical assessment for a footprint-restoring transosseous-equivalent rotator cuff repair technique compared with a double-row repair technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007;16:469–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ratti C, Murena L, Surace MF, Rolla PR. Clinical and ultrasound results after arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff. Chir Organi Mov. 2005;90:95–104.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Reardon DJ, Maffulli N. Clinical evidence shows no difference between single- and double-row repair for rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:670–673.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sauerbrey AM, Getz CL, Piancastelli M, Iannotti JP, Ramsey ML, Williams GR Jr. Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcome. Arthroscopy. 2005;21:1415–1420.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Tashjian RZ, Levanthal E, Spenciner DB, Green A, Fleming BC. Initial fixation strength of massive rotator cuff tears: in vitro comparison of single-row suture anchor and transosseous tunnel constructs. Arthroscopy. 2007;23:710–716.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tauro JC. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: analysis of technique and results at 2- and 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 1998;14:45–51.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Teefey SA, Hasan SA, Middleton WD, Patel M, Wright RW, Yamaguchi K. Ultrasonography of the rotator cuff: a comparison of ultrasonographic and arthroscopic findings in one hundred consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82:498–504.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Verma NN, Dunn W, Adler RS, Cordasco FA, Allen A, MacGillivray J, Craig E, Warren RF, Altchek DW. All-arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a retrospective review with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy. 2006;22:587–594.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Wolf EM, Pennington WT, Agrawal V. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: 4- to 10-year results. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:5–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yamaguchi K, Levine WN, Marra G, Galatz LM, Klepps S, Flatow EL. Transitioning to arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: the pros and cons. Instr Course Lect. 2003;52:81–92.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Youm T, Murray DH, Kubiak EN, Rokito AS, Zuckerman JD. Arthroscopic versus mini-open rotator cuff repair: a comparison of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:455–459.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank SN Jeanette Marshall and SN Belinda Bosley for assistance with clinical examination and data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George A. C. Murrell MBBS, DPhil, MD.

Additional information

One or more of the authors have received funding from Mitek Australia (GACM) and ArthroCare Australia/United Kingdom (GACM, NLM).

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation and that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent for participation in the study was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Millar, N.L., Wu, X., Tantau, R. et al. Open versus Two Forms of Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467, 966–978 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0706-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0706-0

Keywords

Navigation