Abstract
Introduction: A fundamental purpose of neurocritical care is the management of secondary brain injury. This is often accomplished by monitoring and managing individual patient parameters including physiological vital signs. Yet, the ability to record physiological data exceeds our ability to fully integrate it into patient care. We propose that advances in monitoring must be accompanied by advances in methods of high-frequency, multivariate data analysis that integrate the multiple processes occurring in critically ill patients.
Methods: We describe initial work in the emerging field of physiological informatics in critical care medicine. We analyzed data on 23 patients with brain injury from our Neurotrauma and Critical Care Database, which contains more than 20 physiological parameters recorded automatically at one-minute intervals via bedside monitors connected to standard personal computers. We performed exploratory data analysis, studied two patient cases in detail, and implemented a data-driven classification approach using hierarchical clustering.
Results: In this study, we present challenges and opportunities for high-frequency multimodal monitoring to quantitatively detect secondary brain insults, and develop clustering methodology to construct multivariate physiological data “profiles” to classify patients for diagnosis and treatment.
Conclusions: Recording of many physiological variables across multiple patients is feasible and can lead to new clinical insights. Computational and analytical methods previously used primarily for basic science may have clinical relevance and can potentially be adapted to provide physicians with improved ability to integrate complex information for decision making in neurocritical care.
(Neurocrit. Care 2007;06:1–8)
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Czosnyka M, Pickard JD. (2004) Monitoring and interpretation of in tracranial pressure. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 75: 813–821
Kett-White R, Hutchinson PJ, Czosnyka M, Boniface S, Pickard JD, Kirkpatrick PJ. (2002) Multi-modal monitoring of acute brain injury. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg 27:87–134
Czosnyka M, Whitehouse H, Smielewski P, Kirkpatrick P, Guazzo EP, Pickard JD.(1994). Computer supported multimodal bed-side monitoring for neuro intensive care. Int J Clin Monit Comput 11:223–232
Struchen MA, Hannay HJ, Contant CF, Robertson CS (2001). The relation between acute physiological variables and outcome on the Glasgow Outcome Scale and Disability Rating Scale following severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 18:115–125
Kapetanovic IM, Rosenfeld S. (2004). Overview of commonly used bioinformatics methods and their applications. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1020:10–21
Kim JH (2002). Bioinformatics and genomic medicine. Genet Med 4(6 Suppl):62–65
Goldstein B, McNames J, McDonald BA, et al. (2003). Physiologic data acquisition system and database for the study of disease dynamics in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 31: 433–441
Nelson DW, Bellander BM, Maccallum RM, et al. (2004). Cerebral microdialysis of patients with severe traumatic brain injuryexhibits highly individualistic patterns as visualized by cluster analysis with self-organizing maps. Crit Care Med 32:02428–2436
Baker SP, O‘Neill B, Haddon W Jr, Long WB. (1974) The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma 14:187–196
Jones PA, Minns RA, Lo TY, Andrews PJ, Taylor GS, Ali S (2003). Graphical display of variability and inter-relationships of pressure signals in children with traumatic brain injury. Physiol Meas;24:201–211
Marwitz JH, Cifu DX, Englander J, High WM Jr. (2001). A multi-center analysis of rehospitalizations five years after brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 16:307–317
Burnett DM, Silver TM, Kolakowsky-Hayner SA, Cifu DX (2000) Functional outcome for African Americans and Hispanics treated at a traumatic brain injury model systems centre. Brain Inj 14:713–718
Cifu DX, Keyser-Marcus L, Lopez E, et al (1997). Acute predictors of successful return to work 1 year after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:125–131
Cifu DX, Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Rosenthal M, Englander J, High W. (1996) Functional outcomes of older adults with traumatic brain injury: a prospective, multicenter analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77:883–888
Stuss DT, Binns MA, Carruth FG, et al (2000) Prediction of recovery of continuous memory after traumatic brain injury. Neurology 54:1337–1344
Andrews PJ, Sleeman DH, Statham PF, et al. (2002) Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression. J Neurosurg 97: 326–336
Temkin NR, Holubkov R, Machamer JE, Winn HR, Dikmen SS (1995) Classification and regression trees (CART) for prediction of function at 1 year following head trauma. J Neurosurg 82:764–771
Kentala E, Viikki K, Pyykko I, Juhola M (2000) Production of diagnostic rules from a neurotologic database with decision trees. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 109:170–176
Herskovits EH, Gerring JP (2003) Application of a data-mining method based on Bayesian networks to lesion-deficit analysis. Neuroimage 19:1664–1673
Salvador R, Suckling J, Coleman MR, Pickard JD, Menon D, Bullmore E (2005) Neurophysiological architecture of functional magnetic resonance images of human brain. Cereb Cortex 15:1332–1342
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sorani, M.D., Hemphill, J.C., Morabito, D. et al. New Approaches to Physiological Informatics in Neurocritical Care. Neurocrit Care 7, 45–52 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-007-0043-7
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-007-0043-7