Abstract
Bevacizumab is approved for use as first-line therapy in advanced breast cancer according to pivotal ECOG 2,100 trial. Recently, Food and Drug Administration (FDA) voted unanimously against this licensed indication from the product’s labeling. This is because 2 other trials have been conducted (AVADO and RIBBON-1) and both have shown a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival, although of a much smaller magnitude than was seen in E2100 study. After meta-analysing 2-s-line randomized bevacizumab trials that addressed a little bit different populations (a pure second-line population in RIBBON2 and an heavily pretreated [1–2 previous lines] population in Miller trial), we have discovered that overall response rate (relative risk 1.63; 95% CI 1.02–2.62; P = 0.04) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.85; 95% CI 0.73–0.98; P = 0.03) were significantly increased with the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy. Despite both trials, the results are not significant in terms of duration of responses; however, bevacizumab appears not to increase the toxicity of chemotherapy (in particular febrile neutropenia). In conclusion, bevacizumab label in breast cancer could be reconsidered at least for second-line setting where a standard option does not exist, and a real difference in OS is unproven and unnecessary with any regimen in randomized trials.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Miller K, Wang M, Gralow J, et al. Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2666–76.
Miles DW, Chan A, Dirix LY, et al. Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3239–47.
Robert NJ, Dieras V, Glaspy J, et al. RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab (B) for first-line treatment of HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(Suppl):15s. (Abstr 1005).
Johnson JR, Williams G, Pazdur R. End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1404–11.
Miller KD, Chap LI, Holmes FA, Cobleigh MA, Marcom PK, Fehrenbacher L, Dickler M, Overmoyer BA, Reimann JD, Sing AP, Langmuir V, Rugo HS. Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(4):792–9.
Brufsky A, Bondarenko IN, Smirnov V, et al. RIBBON-2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for second-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Program and abstracts of the 32nd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; December 9–13, 2009; San Antonio, Texas. Abstract 42.
Chen HX, Mooney M, Boron M, et al. Phase II multicenter trial of bevacizumab plus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with advanced refractory colorectal cancer: an NCI Treatment Referral Center Trial TRC-0301. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(21):3354–60.
Cortes J, Vahdat L, Blum JL et al. Phase II Study of the Halichondrin B Analog Eribulin Mesylate in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With an Anthracycline, a Taxane, and Capecitabine. J Clin Oncol. 2010. [Epub ahead of print].
Thomas ES, Gomez HL, Li RK, et al. Ixabepilone plus capecitabine for metastatic breast cancer progressing after anthracycline and taxane treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(33):5210–7.
Hortobagyi GN, Gomez HL, Li RK, Chung HC, Fein LE, Chan VF, Jassem J, Lerzo GL, Pivot XB, Hurtado de Mendoza F, Xu B, Vahdat LT, Peck RA, Mukhopadhyay P, Roché HH. Analysis of overall survival from a phase III study of ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine in patients with MBC resistant to anthracyclines and taxanes. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;122(2):409–18.
Sparano JA, Vrdoljak E, Rixe O, Xu B, Manikhas A, Medina C, Da Costa SC, Ro J, Rubio G, Rondinon M, Perez Manga G, Peck R, Poulart V, Conte P. Randomized phase III trial of ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(20):3256–63.
Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N, Shaw H, Desai N, Bhar P, Hawkins M, O’Shaughnessy J. Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(31):7794–803.
Martín M, Ruiz A, Muñoz M, Balil A, García-Mata J, Calvo L, Carrasco E, Mahillo E, Casado A, García-Saenz JA, Escudero MJ, Guillem V, Jara C, Ribelles N, Salas F, Soto C, Morales-Vasquez F, Rodríguez CA, Adrover E, Mel JR. Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial. Gemcitabine plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes: final results of the phase III Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group (GEICAM) trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8(3):219–25.
O’Shaughnessy J, Miles D, Gray RJ, et al. A meta-analysis of overall survival data from three randomized trials of bevacizumab (BV) and first-line chemotherapy as treatment for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:15s. (suppl; abstr 1005).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petrelli, F., Barni, S. Bevacizumab in advanced breast cancer: an opportunity as second-line therapy?. Med Oncol 29, 1–4 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9773-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-010-9773-z