Skip to main content
Log in

Liver fibrosis: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL)

  • APASL Guidelines
  • Published:
Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Liver fibrosis is a common pathway leading to cirrhosis, which is the final result of injury to the liver. Accurate assessment of the degree of fibrosis is important clinically, especially when treatments aimed at reversing fibrosis are being evolved. Liver biopsy has been considered to be the “gold standard” to assess fibrosis. However, liver biopsy being invasive and, in many instances, not favored by patients or physicians, alternative approaches to assess liver fibrosis have assumed great importance. Moreover, therapies aimed at reversing the liver fibrosis have also been tried lately with variable results. Till now, there has been no consensus on various clinical, pathological, and radiological aspects of liver fibrosis. The Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver set up a working party on liver fibrosis in 2007, with a mandate to develop consensus guidelines on various aspects of liver fibrosis relevant to disease patterns and clinical practice in the Asia-Pacific region. The process for the development of these consensus guidelines involved the following: review of all available published literature by a core group of experts; proposal of consensus statements by the experts; discussion of the contentious issues; and unanimous approval of the consensus statements after discussion. The Oxford System of evidence-based approach was adopted for developing the consensus statements using the level of evidence from 1 (highest) to 5 (lowest) and grade of recommendation from A (strongest) to D (weakest). The consensus statements are presented in this review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grigorescu M. Noninvasive biochemical markers of liver fibrosis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2006;15:149–159

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Maharaj B, Maharaj RJ, Leary WP, Cooppan RM, Naran AD, Pirie D, et al. Sampling variability and its influence on the diagnostic yield of percutaneous needle biopsy of the liver. Lancet 1986;1:523–525. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(86)90883-4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hølund B, Poulsen H, Schlichting P. Reproducibility of liver biopsy diagnosis in relation to the size of the specimen. Scand J Gastroenterol 1980;15:329–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Colloredo G, Guido M, Sonzogni A, Leandro G. Impact of liver biopsy size on histological evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis: the smaller the sample, the milder the disease. J Hepatol 2003;39:239–244. doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00191-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E, et al. Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 2005;128:1898–1906. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2005.03.084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grizzi F, Russo C, Franceschini B, Di Rocco M, Torri V, Morenghi E, et al. Sampling variability of computer-aided fractal-corrected measures of liver fibrosis in needle biopsy specimens. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:7660–7665

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dioguardi N, Grizzi F, Franceschini B, Bossi P, Russo C. Liver fibrosis and tissue architectural change measurement using fractal-rectified metrics and Hurst’s exponent. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:2187–2194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Skripenova S, Trainer TD, Krawitt EL, Blaszyk H. Variability of grade and stage in simultaneous paired liver biopsies in patients with hepatitis C. J Clin Pathol 2007;60:321–324. doi:10.1136/jcp.2005.036020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Groote J, Desmet VJ, Gedigk P, Korb G, Popper H, Poulsen H, et al. A classification of chronic hepatitis. Lancet 1968;2:626–628. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(68)90710-1

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Knodell RG, Ishak KG, Black WC, Chen TS, Craig R, Kaplowitz N, et al. Formulation and application of a numerical scoring system for assessing histological activity in asymptomatic chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology 1981;1:431–435. doi:10.1002/hep.1840010511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group. Hepatology 1996;24:289–293. doi:10.1002/hep.510240201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishak K, Baptista A, Bianchi L, Callea F, De Groote J, Gudat F, et al. Histological grading and staging of chronic hepatitis. J Hepatol 1995;22:696–699. doi:10.1016/0168-8278(95)80226-6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Westin J, Lagging LM, Wejstål R, Norkrans G, Dhillon AP. Interobserver study of liver histopathology using the Ishak score in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. Liver 1999;19:183–187. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.1999.tb00033.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Matalka II, Al-Jarrah OM, Manasrah TM. Quantitative assessment of liver fibrosis: a novel automated image analysis method. Liver Int 2006;26:1054–1064. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2006.01341.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wai CT, Greenson JK, Fontana RJ, Kalbfleisch JD, Marrero JA, Conjeevaram HS, et al. A simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003;38:518–526. doi:10.1053/jhep.2003.50346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lieber CS, Weiss DG, Morgan TR, Paronetto F. Aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index in patients with alcoholic liver fibrosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:1500–1508. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00610.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Poynard T, Imbert-Bismut F, Munteanu M, Messous D, Myers RP, Thabut D, et al. Overview of the diagnostic value of biochemical markers of liver fibrosis (FibroTest, HCV FibroSure) and necrosis (ActiTest) in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Comp Hepatol 2004;3:8. doi:10.1186/1476-5926-3-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenberg WM. Rating fibrosis progression in chronic liver diseases. J Hepatol 2003;38:357–360. doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(03)00010-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Poordad FF. FIBROSpect II: a potential noninvasive test to assess hepatic fibrosis. Expert Rev Mol Diagn 2004;4:593–537. doi:10.1586/14737159.4.5.593

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel K, Gordon SC, Jacobson I, Hézode C, Oh E, Smith KM, et al. Evaluation of a panel of non-invasive serum markers to differentiate mild from moderate-to-advanced liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C patients. J Hepatol 2004;41:935–942. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2004.08.008

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Adams LA, Bulsara M, Rossi E, DeBoer B, Speers D, George J, et al. Hepascore: an accurate validated predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C infection. Clin Chem 2005;51:1867–1873. doi:10.1373/clinchem.2005.048389

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Calès P, Oberti F, Michalak S, Hubert-Fouchard I, Rousselet MC, Konaté A, et al. A novel panel of blood markers to assess the degree of liver fibrosis. Hepatology 2005;42:1373–1381. doi:10.1002/hep.20935

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Festi D, Capodicasa S, Sandri L, Colaiocco-Ferrante L, Staniscia T, Vitacolonna E, et al. Measurement of hepatic functional mass by means of 13C-methacetin and 13C-phenylalanine breath tests in chronic liver disease: comparison with Child-Pugh score and serum bile acid levels. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:142–148

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Di Campli C, Angelini G, Armuzzi A, Nardo B, Zocco MA, Candelli M, et al. Quantitative evaluation of liver function by the methionine and aminopyrine breath tests in the early stages of liver transplantation. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2003;15:727–732. doi:10.1097/00042737-200307000-00003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Attallah AM, Shiha GE, Omran MM, Zalata KR. A discriminant score based on four routine laboratory blood tests for accurate diagnosis of severe fibrosis and/or liver cirrhosis in Egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatol Res 2006;34:163–169. doi:10.1016/j.hepres.2005.12.004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Iacobellis A, Fusilli S, Mangia A, Clemente R, Festa V, Giacobbe A, et al. Ultrasonographic and biochemical parameters in the non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus chronic hepatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2005;22:769–774. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2005.02633.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fontana RJ, Lok AS. Noninvasive monitoring of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2002;36(5 Suppl 1):S57–S64. doi:10.1053/jhep.2002.36800

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdel-Wahab MF, Esmat G, Farrag A, el-Boraey YA, Strickland GT. Grading of hepatic schistosomiasis by the use of ultrasonography. Am J Trop Med Hyg 1992;46:403–408

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu CH, Lin JW, Tsai FC, Yang PM, Lai MY, Chen JH, et al. Noninvasive tests for the prediction of significant hepatic fibrosis in hepatitis C virus carriers with persistently normal alanine aminotransferases. Liver Int 2006;26:1087–1094. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2006.01355.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Richter J, Correia Dacal AR, Vergetti Siqueira JG, Poggensee G, Mannsmann U, Deelder A, et al. Sonographic prediction of variceal bleeding in patients with liver fibrosis due to Schistosoma mansoni. Trop Med Int Health 1998;3:728–735

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Albrecht T, Blomley MJ, Cosgrove DO, Taylor-Robinson SD, Jayaram V, Eckersley R, et al. Non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic cirrhosis by transit-time analysis of an ultrasound contrast agent. Lancet 1999;353:1579–1583. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)06373-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaneko T, Teshigawara O, Sugimoto H, Hirota M, Inoue S, Takeda S, et al. Signal intensity of the liver parenchyma in microbubble contrast agent in the late liver phase reflects advanced fibrosis of the liver. Liver Int 2005;25:288–293. doi:10.1111/j.1478-3231.2005.01025.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, Yon S, Fournier C, Mal F, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1705–1713. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.07.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Castéra L, Vergniol J, Foucher J, Le Bail B, Chanteloup E, Haaser M, et al. Prospective comparison of transient elastography, Fibrotest, APRI, and liver biopsy for the assessment of fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology 2005;128:343–350. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2004.11.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. de Lédinghen V, Douvin C, Kettaneh A, Ziol M, Roulot D, Marcellin P, et al. Diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis by transient elastography in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2006;41:175–179. doi:10.1097/01.qai.0000194238.15831.c7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Talwalkar JA, Kurtz DM, Schoenleber SJ, West CP, Montori VM. Ultrasound-based transient elastography for the detection of hepatic fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;5:1214–1220. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2007.07.020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Shaheen AA, Wan AF, Myers RP. FibroTest and FibroScan for the prediction of hepatitis C-related fibrosis: a systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2589–2600. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01466.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Samonakis DN, Cholongitas E, Thalheimer U, Kalambokis G, Quaglia A, Triantos CK, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient to assess fibrosis and its progression after liver transplantation for HCV cirrhosis. Liver Transpl 2007;13:1305–1311. doi:10.1002/lt.21227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Vizzutti F, Arena U, Romanelli RG, Rega L, Foschi M, Colagrande S, et al. Liver stiffness measurement predicts severe portal hypertension in patients with HCV-related cirrhosis. Hepatology 2007;45:1290–1297. doi:10.1002/hep.21665

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar A, Sharma P, Sarin SK. Hepatic venous pressure gradient measurement: time to learn!. Indian J Gastroenterol 2008;27:74

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Groszmann R, Vorobioff JD, Gao H. Measurement of portal pressure: when, how, and why to do it. Clin Liver Dis 2006;10:499–512. doi:10.1016/j.cld.2006.08.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Groszmann RJ, Wongcharatrawee S. The hepatic venous pressure gradient: anything worth doing should be done right. Hepatology 2004;39:280–282. doi:10.1002/hep.20062

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Groszmann RJ, Glickman M, Blei AT, Storer E, Conn HO. Wedged and free hepatic venous pressure measured with a balloon catheter. Gastroenterology 1979;76:253–258

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Huet PM, Pomier-Layrargues G. The hepatic venous pressure gradient: “remixed and revisited”. Hepatology 2004;39:295–298. doi:10.1002/hep.20070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Boyer TD. Wedged hepatic vein pressure (WHVP): ready for prime time. Hepatology 2006;43:405–406. doi:10.1002/hep.21118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pinzani M, Gentilini P. Biology of hepatic stellate cells and their possible relevance in the pathogenesis of portal hypertension in cirrhosis. Semin Liver Dis 1999;19:397–410

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Poynard T, Ratziu V, Bedossa P. Appropriateness of liver biopsy. Can J Gastroenterol 2000;14:543–548

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Rincon D, Ripoll C, Lo Iacono O, Salcedo M, Catalina MV, Alvarez E, et al. Antiviral therapy decreases hepatic venous pressure gradient in patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2269–2274. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2006.00743.x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Kumar M, Kumar A, Hissar S, Jain P, Rastogi A, Kumar D, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient as a predictor of fibrosis in chronic liver disease because of hepatitis B virus. Liver Int 2008;28:690–698

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shiratori Y, Imazeki F, Moriyama M, Yano M, Arakawa Y, Yokosuka O, et al. Histologic improvement of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis C who have sustained response to interferon therapy. Ann Intern Med 2000;132(7):517–524

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Veldt BJ, Saracco G, Boyer N, Camma C, Bellobuono A, Hopf U, et al. Long term clinical outcome of chronic hepatitis C patients with sustained virological response to interferon monotherapy. Gut 2004;53:1504–1508. doi:10.1136/gut.2003.038257

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Leandro G, Mangia A, Hui J, Fabris P, Rubbia-Brandt L, Colloredo G, et al. Meta-analysis HCV (on) individual patients’ data Study Group relationship between steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Gastroenterology 2006;130:1636–1642. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Saller R, Meier R, Brignoli R. The use of silymarin in the treatment of liver diseases. Drugs 2001;61:2035–2063. doi:10.2165/00003495-200161140-00003

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Muriel P, Garciapiña T, Perez-Alvarez V, Mourelle M. Silymarin protects against paracetamol-induced lipid peroxidation and liver damage. J Appl Toxicol 1992;12:439–442. doi:10.1002/jat.2550120613

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Hakov’a H, Misúrová E. The effect of silymarin and gamma radiation on nucleic acids in rat organs. J Pharm Pharmacol 1993;45:910–912

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Rambaldi A, Jacobs BP, Gluud C. Milk thistle for alcoholic and/or hepatitis B or C virus liver diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(4):CD003620

  57. Trinchet JC, Coste T, Lévy VG, Vivet F, Duchatelle V, Legendre C, et al. Treatment of alcoholic hepatitis with silymarin A double-blind comparative study in 116 patients. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 1989;13:120–124

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Stickel F, Schuppan D. Herbal medicine in the treatment of liver diseases. Dig Liver Dis 2007;39:293–304. doi:10.1016/j.dld.2006.11.004

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  59. Popper H, Zak FG. Pathologic aspects of cirrhosis. Am J Med 1958;24:593–619. doi:10.1016/0002-9343(58)90298-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Agarwal BL. Cirrhosis of the liver. BMJ 1968;2:561–562

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Anthony PP, Ishak KG, Nayak NC, Poulsen HE, Scheuer PJ, Sobin LH. The morphology of cirrhosis. Recommendations on definition, nomenclature, and classification by a working group sponsored by the World Health Organization. J Clin Pathol 1978;31:395–414. doi:10.1136/jcp.31.5.395

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Huang YH, Shi MN, Zheng WD, Zhang LJ, Chen ZX, Wang XZ. Therapeutic effect of interleukin–10 on CCl4-induced hepatic fibrosis in rats. World J Gastroenterol 2006;12:1386–1391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Wanless IR, Nakashima E, Sherman M. Regression of human cirrhosis. Morphologic features and the genesis of incomplete septal cirrhosis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124:1599–1607

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Popper H, Elias H. Histogenesis of hepatic cirrhosis studied by the three-dimensional approach. Am J Pathol 1955;31:405–441

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Pérez-Tamayo R. Cirrhosis of the liver: a reversible disease? Pathol Annu 1979;14:183–213

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Wang YJ, Lee SD, Hsieh MC, Lin HC, Lee FY, Tsay SH, et al. A double-blind randomized controlled trial of colchicine in patients with hepatitis B virus-related postnecrotic cirrhosis. J Hepatol 1994;21:872–877. doi:10.1016/S0168-8278(94)80252-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Verma S, Gunuwan B, Mendler M, Govindrajan S, Redeker A. Factors predicting relapse and poor outcome in type I autoimmune hepatitis: role of cirrhosis development, patterns of transaminases during remission and plasma cell activity in the liver biopsy. Am J Gastroenterol 2004;99:1510–1516. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2004.30457.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Muddu AK, Guha IN, Elsharkawy AM, Mann DA. Resolving fibrosis in the diseased liver: translating the scientific promise to the clinic. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007;39:695–714. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2006.10.006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gamal Shiha.

Additional information

The members of Jury of the APASL Consensus Development Meeting are given in Appendix 1.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Egyptians: Abdelrhman Elzayadi, Abdelhamid Abaza, Abdelkhalek Hamed, Abdelrhman Zekry, Abueldahab Elsahly, Ahmed Eldorry, Bahaa Abass, Basma Samir, Emad Barakat, Eman Rewisha, Fayza Azzam, Hassan Elshenawy, Inas El-Korimi, Khaled Hemedah, Helmy Abaza, Khaled Zalata, Mazen Naga, Magdy Atta, Mamdouh Gabr, Mohamed Amer Afefy, Mohamed Elateek, Mohamed El-Khashab, Mohamed Sharaf Eldin, Mohsen Maher, Mostafa Elawady, Mostafa Gabr, Omar Haikal, Rasheed Bahgat, Sherif Abdelfattah, Taghreed Gaafar, Tawheed Mowafy, Yousry Taher.

International: Abdelatif Charqawi (Morocco), Abdul-Naser Elzouki (Libya), Ali Elsaid (UAE), Hasnain Ali Shah (Pakistan), Mamun-Al-Mahtab (Bangladesh), Nizar Zein (USA), Salem Awad (UAE).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiha, G., Sarin, S.K., Ibrahim, A.E. et al. Liver fibrosis: consensus recommendations of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). Hepatol Int 3, 323–333 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-008-9114-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-008-9114-x

Keywords

Navigation