Skip to main content
Log in

Liver stiffness measurement in the risk assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with chronic hepatitis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hepatology International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Backgroud/aims

The risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) increased with progression of hepatic fibrosis as assessed by liver stiffness measurement (LSM). This study used LSM to assess the risk of HCC presence in patients with chronic hepatitis.

Methods

The patients with liver tumor or chronic hepatitis indicated for biopsy were prospectively enrolled. LSM was performed on the same day as biopsy. The diagnostic performances of clinical parameters and LSM in predicting HCC presence were compared with the areas under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROC). The risk of HCC presence was assessed with stratum-specific likelihood ratios (SSLR). The cut-off values and its diagnostic validity were calculated for LSM.

Results

A total of 435 patients, including 106 HCC and 329 chronic hepatitis, were enrolled. The AUROC in predicting HCC presence was 0.736, 0.733, 0.594, 0.579 and 0.532 for LSM, alpha-fetoprotein, platelet count, total bilirubin, and aspartate aminotransferase–platelet ratio index, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed liver stiffness was an independent factor for HCC presence (odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.09). SSLR for HCC presence by liver stiffness was 0.43 (95% CI 0.32–0.57) in <12 kPa, 1.28 (0.89–1.84) in 12–24 kPa, and 5.94 (3.77–9.35) in >24 kPa. With 12 and 24 kPa as the cut-offs in predicting HCC presence, the sensitivity was 69.8 and 41.5%, respectively. The specificity was 69.6 and 92.7%, respectively.

Conclusions

LSM identified the risk group for HCC presence in chronic hepatitis patients and had high specificity in the prediction of HCC with the cut-off of 24 kPa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benvegnu L, Gios M, Boccato S, et al. Natural history of compensated viral cirrhosis: a prospective study on the incidence and hierarchy of major complications. Gut 2004;53:744–749

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fattovich G, Stroffolini T, Zagni I, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis: incidence and risk factors. Gastroenterology 2004;127:S35–S50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshida H, Shiratori Y, Moriyama M, et al. Interferon therapy reduces the risk for hepatocellular carcinoma: national surveillance program of cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan. IHIT Study Group. Inhibition of Hepatocarcinogenesis by Interferon Therapy. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:174–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bravo AA, Sheth SG, Chopra S. Liver biopsy. N Engl J Med 2001;344:495–500

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Regev A, Berho M, Jeffers LJ, et al. Sampling error and inter-observer variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection. Am J Gastroenterol 2002;97:2614–2618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bedossa P, Dalgere D, Paradis V. Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Hepatology 2003;38:1449–1457

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Piccinino F, Sagnelli E, Pasquale G, et al. Complications following percutaneous liver biopsy: a multicentre retrospective study on 68276 biopsies. J Hepatol 1986;2:165–173

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Foucher J, Chanteloup E, Vergniol J, et al. Diagnosis of cirrhosis by transient elastography (FibroScan): a prospective study. Gut 2006;55:403–408

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fraquelli M, Rigamonti C, Casazza G, et al. Reproducibility of transient elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic liver disease. Gut 2007;56:968–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ganne-Carrie N, Ziol M, de Ledinghen V, et al. Accuracy of liver stiffness measurement for the diagnosis of cirrhosis in patients with chronic liver diseases. Hepatology 2006;44:1511–1517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Ultrasound Med Biol 2003;29:1705–1713

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang JH, Changchien CS, Hung CH, et al. FibroScan and ultrasonography in the prediction of hepatic fibrosis in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. J Gastroenterol 2009;44:439–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Masuzaki R, Tateishi R, Yoshida H, et al. Risk assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis C patients by transient elastography. J Clin Gastroenterol 2008;42:839–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29–36

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983;148:839–843

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Peirce JC, Cornell RG. Integrating stratum-specific likelihood ratios with the analysis of ROC curves. Med Decis Making 1993;13:141–151

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Furukawa TA, Goldberg DP, Rabe-Hesketh S, et al. Stratum specific likelihood ratios of two versions of the general health questionnaire. Psychol Med 2001;31:519–529

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Friedrich-Rust M, Ong MF, Martens S, et al. Performance of transient elastography for the staging of liver fibrosis: a meta-analysis. Gastroenterology 2008;134:960–974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Castéra L, Le Bail B, Roudot-Thoraval F, et al. Early detection in routine clinical practice of cirrhosis and oesophageal varices in chronic hepatitis C: comparison of transient elastography (FibroScan) with standard laboratory tests and non-invasive scores. J Hepatol 2009;50:59–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Szabó E, Páska C, Kaposi Novák P, et al. Similarities and differences in hepatitis B and C virus induced hepatocarcinogenesis. Pathol Oncol Res 2004;10:5–11

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gurtsevitch VE. Human oncogenic viruses: hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and their role in hepatocarcinogenesis. Biochemistry (Mosc). 2008;73:504–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sagir A, Erhardt A, Schmitt M, et al. Transient elastography is unreliable for detection of cirrhosis in patients with acute liver damage. Hepatology 2008;47:592–595

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nahon P, Kettaneha A, Lemoine M, et al. Liver stiffness measurement in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009;21:214–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Masuzaki R, Tateishi R, Yoshida H, et al. Prospective risk assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma development in patients with chronic hepatitis C by transient elastography. Hepatology 2009;49:1954–1961

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Del Poggio P, Colombo S. Is transient elastography a useful tool for screening liver disease? World J Gastroenterol 2009;15:1409–1414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bruix J, Sherman M, Practice guidelines committee, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2005;42:1208–1236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kudo M, Okanoue T, Japan Society of Hepatology. Management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: consensus-based clinical practice manual proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology. Oncology 2007;72:S2–S15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu SN, Wang JH, Liu SL, et al. Thrombocytopenia as a surrogate for cirrhosis and a marker for the identification of patients at high-risk for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 2006;107:2212–2222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sinn DH, Paik SW, Kang P, et al. Disease progression and the risk factor analysis for chronic hepatitis C. Liver Int 2008;28:1363–1369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by a grant from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (CMRP G850141) to Sheng-Nan Lu. The authors thank C.Y. Lin for her excellent assistance in statistics and C.L. Li for her secretarial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing-Houng Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kuo, YH., Lu, SN., Hung, CH. et al. Liver stiffness measurement in the risk assessment of hepatocellular carcinoma for patients with chronic hepatitis. Hepatol Int 4, 700–706 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-010-9223-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-010-9223-1

Keywords

Navigation