Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Yale observation scale for prediction of bacteremia in febrile children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the accuracy and reliability of yale observation scale (YOS) predicting bacteremia.

Methods

219 consecutive febrile inpatients aged 3–36 months were the subjects. Before giving antipyretics, rectal temperature was recorded. YOS scores were assessed by 2 independent blinded residents. History, clinical examination and investigations followed. Blood cultures were taken in all children before antibiotics. Point estimates and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for sensitivity, specificity, positive & negative predictive values and likelihood ratios for use of YOS as a diagnostic test in prediction of bacteremia. The best cut off value for a positive YOS test was established by calculating these statistical values separately for a cut off YOS score of 8, 10 and 12 and plotting ROC curve. Reliability of YOS was assessed by the inter-observer agreement through kappa statistics.

Results

Study population (n=219) had 59.36% males and a mean age of 15.24 months. 28.16% subjects had bacteremia. Mean YOS scores were significantly higher in bacteremic children (14.9 vs 8.78 in non-bacteremic, p=0.00001) Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, LR+ and LR− of YOS score >10 to predict bacteremia were 87.93%, 83.78%, 68.00%, 94.66%, 5.42 and 0.14 respectively. Those of YOS score >8 were 96.55%, 65.54%, 52.34%, 97.98%, 2.80 and 0.05 respectively and of a YOS score >12 were 48.28%, 91.22%, 68.29%, 81.82%, 5.5 and 0.5 respectively. ROC curve showed YOS score >10 to be the best cut off for prediction of bacteremia. Area under ROC curve was 0.9001. The chance corrected inter-observer agreement (kappa) was 0.7919.

Conclusion

YOS is a simple, easy to administer, cost-effective and useful test to predict bacteremia in a febrile child aged 3–36 months due to its high sensitivity and reproducibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wright PF, Thompson J, McKee KT, Vaughn WK, Sell SH, Karzon DT. Patterns of illness in the highly febrile young child: epidemiologic, clinical and laboratory correlates. Pediatrics 1981;67:694–700.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. McCarthy PL, Sharpe MR, Spiesel SZ et al. Observation scales to identify serious illness in febrile children. Pediatrics 1982;70: 802–809.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mackowiak PA. Concepts of fever. Arch Int Med 1998;158: 1870–1881.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brayden RM, Daley MF, Brown JM. Ambulatory and community pediatrics. In Hay WW Jr, Hayward AR, Levin MJ, Sondheimer JM eds. Current Pediatric Diagnosis and Treatment, 16th ed. New York; Lange medical books / Mcgraw Hill Medical Publishing Division, 2003:237–238.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson D. Assessing and managing the febrile child. Nurse Pract 1995;20(11 Pt 1):59–60, 68–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Eoff MJ, Joyce B. Temperature measurements in children. Am J Nurs 1981;81:1010–1011.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Torrance JT. Temperature readings of premature infants. Nurs Res 1968;17:312–320.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sr Nancy. Stephanie’s principles and practice of nursing. Vol 1. Nursing Arts Procedures 3rd ed, Indore; NR Publishers, 1995: 118–125.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mayfield ST, Bhatia J, Nalcamura KT, Rios GR, Bell EF. Temperature measurement in term and preterm neonates. J Pediatr 1984;104:271–275.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Altman DG. Practical statistics for medical research. London: Chapman & Hall, 1991; 403–409.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Waskerwitz S, Berkelhamer JE. Outpatient bacteremia: Clinical findings in children under two years with initial temperatures of 39.50C or higher. J Pediatr 1981;99:213–233.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jamuna R, Srinivasan S, Harish BN. Factors predicting occult bacteremia in young children. Indian J Pediatr 2000;67:709–711.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Liu CH, Lehan C, Speer ME et al. Early detection of bacteremia in an outpatient clinic. Pediatrics 1985; 75: 827–831.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Alpern ER, Alessandrini EA, Bell LM, Shaw KN, McGowan KL. Occult bacteremia from a pediatric emergency department: Current prevalence, time to detection, and outcome. Pediatrics 2000; 106: 505–511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bonadio WA. The history and physical assessment of the febrile infant. Pediatr Clin North Am 1998; 45: 65–77.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. McCarthy PL, Jekel JF, Stashwick CA et al. Further definition of history and observation variables in assessing febrile children. Pediatrics 1981; 67: 687–693.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Teach SJ, Fleisher GR. Efficacy of an observation scale in detecting bacteremia in febrile children three to thirty six months of age, treated as outpatients. Occult bacteremia study group. J Pediatr 1995; 126: 877–881.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baker RC, Tiller T, Bausher JC et al. Severity of disease correlated with fever reduction in febrile infants. Pediatrics 1989; 83: 1016–1019.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Baker MD, Avner JR, Bell LM. Failure of infant observation scales in detecting serious illness in febrile, 4- to 8-weekold infants. Pediatrics 1990; 85: 1040–1043.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akash Bang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bang, A., Chaturvedi, P. Yale observation scale for prediction of bacteremia in febrile children. Indian J Pediatr 76, 599–604 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-009-0065-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-009-0065-6

Key words

Navigation