Skip to main content
Log in

Robotic surgery in thoracic cancer

  • Short review
  • Published:
memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

PURPOSE: Recently introduced robotic surgical systems were developed to overcome the limitations of conventional minimally invasive surgery. We analyzed the impact of the da Vinci surgical robot on general (non-cardiac) thoracic oncologic surgery, especially for pulmonary lobectomy in NSCLC patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed by accessing the MEDLINE database for entries on robotic surgery for thoracic cancer. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The da Vinci robotic system is currently the only commercially available robotic surgical system. There is no role for the robot in pulmonary metastasectomy. Several retrospective analyses and case series prove safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted lobectomy for early-stage NSCLC. Strictly spoken, however, this is a hybrid procedure of robotic and conventional thoracoscopic surgical techniques. For no oncologic long-term follow-up data are available by now, an oncologic valuation of the robotic approach is not appropriate yet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Thomas P, Doddoli C, Yena S, et al. VATS is an adequate oncological operation for stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 21: 1094–1099, 2002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Roviaro GC, Varoli F, Vergani C, et al. State of the art in thoracospic surgery: a personal experience of 2000 videothoracoscopic procedures and an overview of the literature. Surg Endosc, 16: 881–892, 2002

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nagahiro I, Andou A, Aoe M, et al. Pulmonary function, postoperative pain, and serum cytokine level after lobectomy: a comparison of VATS and conventional procedure. Ann Thorac Surg, 72: 362–365, 2001

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Forster R, Storck M, Schafer JR, et al. Thoracoscopy versus thoracotomy: a prospective comparison of trauma and quality of life. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 387: 32–36, 2002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dieter RA Jr, Kuzycz GB. Complications and contraindications of thoracoscopy. Int Surg, 82: 232–239, 1997

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cadiere GB, Himpens J, Vertruyen M, et al. Nissen fundoplication done by remotely controlled robotic technique. Ann Chir, 53: 137–141, 1999

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shennib H, Bastawisy A, McLoughlin J, et al. Robotic computer-assisted telemanipulation enhances coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 117: 310–313, 1999

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid T. Robotic surgery. Eur Surg, 3: 155–157, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Carballo M, Maish MS, Jaroszewski DE. Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) as a safe alternative for the resection of pulmonary metastases: a retrospective cohort study. J Cardiothorac Surg, 24: 13, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Erhunmwunsee L, D'Amico TA. Surgical management of pulmonary metastases. Ann Thorac Surg, 88: 2052–2060, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin F, Bodner J, Wykypiel H, et al. Initial experience with robotic lung lobectomy: report of two different approaches. Surg Endosc, 2010. in press

  • Ninan M, Dylewski MR. Total port-access robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy without utility thoracotomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2010. [Epub ahead of print]

  • Veronesi G, Galetta D, Dipeng PM, et al. Four-arm robotic lobectomy for the treatment of early-stage lung cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2009. [Epub ahead of print]

  • Gharagozloo F, Margolis M, Tempesta B, et al. Robot-assisted lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer: report of 100 consecutive cases. Ann Thorac Surg, 88: 380–384, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Park BJ, Flores RM, Rusch VW. Robotic assistance for video-assisted thoracic surgical lobectomy: technique and initial results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 131: 54–59, 2006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JA, Ginsburg ME, Sonett JR, et al. Thoracoscopic lobectomy using robotic technology. Heart Surg Forum, 6: E167–E169, 2003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ashton RC Jr, Connery CP, Swistel DG, et al. Robot-assisted lobectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 126: 292–293, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dolezel J, Vlcek P. Robot-assisted pulmonary lobectomy. Bratisl Lek Listy, 109: 251–253, 2008

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braumann C, Jacobi CA, Menenakos C, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic and thoracoscopic surgery with the da Vinci system: a 4-year experience in a single institution. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 18: 260–266, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bodner J, Wykypiel H, Wetscher G, et al. First experiences with the da Vinci operating robot in thoracic surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 25: 844–851, 2004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Ruiz A, Smedira NG, Loop FD, Hahn JF, Miller JH, Steiner CP, Gagner M. Robotic surgical instruments for dexterity enhancement in thoracoscopic coronary artery bypass graft. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 7: 277–283, 1997

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Bodner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bodner, J., Schmid, T., Wykypiel, H. et al. Robotic surgery in thoracic cancer. memo 3, 103–105 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-010-0216-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12254-010-0216-5

Keywords

Navigation