Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A comparative study between transbuccal and extra-oral approaches in treatment of mandibular fractures

  • Comparative Study
  • Published:
Journal of Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and objectives

Mandibular angle fractures continue to be a common type of facial injury. The objectives in treatment are to effect rapid healing by anatomic reduction and fixation and to restore function and appearance with minimal disability and complications.

Traditionally, when open techniques are utilised, the extra-oral approach is performed through a skin incision concealed in the submandibular crease. However, patients develop unsightly scars and there is a risk of injury to the marginal mandibular nerve.

In comparison, the trans-oral approach, performed through an oral mucosal incision, results in minimal external scarring or injury to the marginal mandibular nerve and allows direct visualisation and confirmation of the desired occlusion during the placement of the miniplates. The basic aim of the study was to provide a treatment for the mandibular fractures which results in minimal scarring and fulfills all the functional needs of the patient.

Study design

Patients coming to KLES PK Hospital and MRC with mandibular angle fractures requiring open reduction and internal fixation admitted under OMFS were taken for the study. The sample size of the study was 15. In one group, the patients were treated by extra-oral approach and the other group by transbuccal approach.

In patients treated by transbuccal approach, special armamentarium consisting of trocar, cannula, and cheek retractor were used; and in both the groups, semirigid fixation was done using two miniplates with around a distance of 1cm.

Results

Total of 15 patients were treated, 10 with transbuccal approach and 5 with submandibular approach. It has been found that both techniques fulfill the functional requirements of the patients. Patients treated with submandibular approach developed obvious unsightly scars, whereas transbuccal approach results in minimal scarring.

Conclusion

The results associated with clinical observations suggest that transbuccal approach is a superior and less time consuming approach than extraoral approach, but it requires special instruments, lots of skill by the operating surgeon in using the armamentarium, and a skilled assistant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kroon FH, Mathisson M, Cordey JR, Rahn BA (1991) The use of miniplates in mandibular fractures — An in vitro study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 19(5): 199–204

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Choi BH, Yoo JH, Kim KN, Kang HS (1995) Stability testing of a two miniplates fixation technique for mandibular angle fractures. An in vitro study. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 23(2): 122–125

    Google Scholar 

  3. Toma VS, Mathog RH, Toma RS, Meleca RJ (2003) Transoral versus extra-oral reduction of mandible fractures: A comparison of complication rates and other factors. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 128(2): 215–219

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dierks EJ (1987) Transoral approach to fractures of the mandible. Laryngoscope 97(1): 4–6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Shira RB (1954) Open reduction of mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg (Chic) 12(2): 95–111

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wagner WF, Neal DC, Alpert B (1979) Morbidity associated with extra-oral open reduction of mandibular fractures. J Oral Surg 37(2): 97–100

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wittenberg JM, Mukherjee DP, Smith BR, Kruse RN (1997) Biomechanical evaluation of new fixation devices for mandibular angle fractures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 26(1): 68–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lizuka T, Lindqvist C, Hallikainen D, Paukku P (1991) Infection after rigid internal fixation of mandibular fractures a clinical and radiological study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 49(6): 585–593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Tams J, van Loon JP, Rozema FR, Otten E, Bos RR (1996) Three dimensional study of loads across the freacture for different fracture sites of the mandible. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 34(5): 400–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berg S, Pape HD (1992) Teeth in the fracture line. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 21(3): 145–146

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chuong R, Donoff RB (1985) Intra-oral open reduction of mandibular fractures. Int J Oral Surg 14(1): 22–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tejraj P. Kale.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kale, T.P., Baliga, S.D., Ahuja, N. et al. A comparative study between transbuccal and extra-oral approaches in treatment of mandibular fractures. J. Maxillofac. Oral Surg. 9, 9–12 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-010-0026-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12663-010-0026-7

Keywords

Navigation