Skip to main content
Log in

Erythromycin Resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes and Macrolide Consumption in a Central Italian Region

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background:

The study investigated macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in a central Italian area from 2001 to 2006 and the possible correlation between antibiotic consumption and fluctuations of resistance percentages.

Materials and Methods:

Macrolide and lincosamide susceptibility of 1,419 S. pyogenes isolates was tested by Kirby Bauer method. Macrolide consumption was valuated as defined daily dose/1,000 inhabitants per day (DID), according to the World Health Organization anatomic therapeutic chemical classification. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the association between resistance and use of (1) all macrolides pooled, (2) once daily, (3) twice daily, and (4) three times daily dosage regimens.

Results:

In total, 320 strains (22.6%) were erythromycinresistant, 11.4% with the M phenotype and 11.2% with the MLS phenotype. There was a significant decrease in erythromycin resistance during the study period—from 28.1% in 2001 to 15.6% in 2006 (p < 0.01). No significant correlation was found between erythromycin resistance and local overall macrolide consumption, neither during the same year nor during the previous year. In contrast, a significant correlation was found between resistance rates and oncedaily macrolide use during the preceding 6 months in Siena r = 0.747, p = 0.008).

Conclusion:

The known greater selective effect of longacting agents could establish a pressure outcome, resulting in a specific local epidemiology during a relatively short time gap.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Bisno AL, Stevens DL: Streptococcus pyogenes. In: Mandell GL, Bennet JE, Dolin R (eds) Principles and practice of infectious diseases. Churchill Livingston, New York 2005, pp 2362–2392.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Horn DL, Zabriskie JB: Why have group A streptococci remained susceptible to penicillin? Report on a symposium. Clin Infect Dis 1998; 26: 1341–1345.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tarlow MJ: Macrolides in management of streptococcal pharyngitis/tonsillitis. Pediatr Infect Dis 1997; 16: 444–448.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kaplan EL, Johnson DR: Unexplained reduced microbiological efficacy of intramuscular benzathine penicillin G and oral penicillinV in eradication of group A streptococci in children with acute pharyngitis. Pediatrics 2001; 108: 1180–1186.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lowbury EJ, Hurst L: The sensitivity of staphylococci and other wound bacteria to erythromycin, oleandomycin, and spiramycin. J Clin Pathol 1959; 12: 163–169.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Skinner R, Cundliffe E, Schmidt FJ: Site of action of a ribosomal RNA methylase responsible for resistance to erythromycin and other antibiotics. J Biol Chem 1983; 258: 12702–12706.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Weisblum B: Erythromycin resistance by ribosome modification. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1995; 39: 577–585.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sutcliffe J, Tait-Kamradt A, Wondrack L: Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes resistant to macrolides but sensitive to clindamycin: a common resistance pattern mediated by an efflux system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1996; 40: 1817–1824.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maruyama S, Yoshioka H, Fujita K, Takimoto M, Satake Y: Sensitivity of group A streptococci to antibiotics. Prevalence of resistance to erythromycin in Japan. Am J Dis Child 1979; 133: 1143–1145.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Canton R, Loza E, Morosini MI, Baquero F: Antimicrobial resistance amongst isolates of Streptococcus pyogenes and Staphylococcus aureus in the PROTEKT antimicrobial surveillance programme during 1999-2000. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 50: 9–24.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gattringer R, Sauermann R, Lagler H, Stich K, Buxbaum A, Graninger W, Georgopoulos A: Antimicrobial susceptibility and macrolide resistance genes in Streptococcus pyogenes collected in Austria and Hungary. Inter J Antimicrob Agents 2004; 24: 92–95.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bingen E, Bidet P, Mihaila-Amrouche L, Doit C, Forcet S, Brahimi N, Bouvet A, Cohen R: Emergence of macrolide-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes strains in French children. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 3559–3562.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Alos JI, Aracil B, Oteo J, Gómez-Garcés JL: Spanish Group for the Study of Infection in the Primary Health Care Setting (IAP-SEIMC): Significant increase in the prevalence of erythromycinresistant, clindamycin- and miocaycin-susceptible (M phenotype) Streptococcus pyogenes in Spain. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003; 51: 333–337.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Green M, Martin JM, Barbadora KA, Beall B, Wald ER: Reemergence of macrolide resistance in pharyngeal isolates of group A streptococci in Southwestern Pennsylvania. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2004; 48: 473–476.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Szczypa K, Sadowy E, Izdebski R, Hryniewicz W: A rapid increase in macrolide resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes isolated in Poland during 1996–2002. J Antimicrob Chemother 2004; 54: 828–831.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rondini G, Cocuzza CE, Cianflone M, Lanzafame A, Santini L, Mattina R: Bacteriological and clinical efficacy of various antibiotics used in the treatment of streptococcal pharingitis in Italy. An epidemiological study. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2001; 18: 9–17.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bronzwaer SL, Cars O, Buchholz U, Mölstad S, Goettsch W, Veldhuijzen IK, Kool JL, Sprenger MJ, Degener JE: European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System A European study on the relationship between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance. Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8: 278–282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Albrich W, Monnet DL, Harbarth S: Antibiotic selection pressure and resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus pyogenes. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10: 514–517.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fujita K, Murono K, Yoshikawa M, Murai T: Decline of erythromycin resistance of group A streptococci in Japan. Pediatr Infect Dis 1994; 13: 1075–1078.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Seppälä H, Klaukka T, Vuopio-Varkila J, Muotiala A, Helenius H, Lager K, Huovinen P: The effect of changes in the consumption of macrolide antibiotics on erythromycin resistance in group A streptococci in Finland. N Engl J Med 1997; 337: 441–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garcia-Rey C, Aguilar L, Baquero F, Casal J, Martín JE: Pharmacoepidemiological analysis of provincial differences between consumption of macrolides and rates of erythromycin resistance among Streptococcus pyogenes isolates in Spain. J Clin Microbiol 2002; 40: 2959–2963.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bergman M, Huikko S, Pihlajamäki M, Laippala P, Palva E, Huovinen P, Seppälä H: Finnish Study Group for Antimicrobial Resistance (FiRe Network) Effect of macrolide consumption on erythromycin resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes in Finland in 1997-2001. Clin Infect Dis 2004; 38: 1251–1256.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ruoff KL, Whiley RA, Beighton D: Streptococcus. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH (eds) Manual of clinical microbiology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington D.C. 2003, pp 405–421.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute: Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility test: approved standard. M2-A9. (9th edn.). CLSI, NCCLS, Wayne, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cresti S, Lattanzi M, Zanchi A, Montagnani F, Pollini S, Cellesi C, Rossolini GM: Resistance determinants and clonal diversity in group A streptococci collected during a period of increasing macrolide resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2002; 46: 1816–1822.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology. Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment, 2007.

  27. Coenen S, Ferech M, Malhotra-Kumar S, Hendrickx E, Suetens C, Goossens H: ESAC Project Group European surveillance of antimicrobial consumption (ESAC): outpatient macrolides, lincosamides and streptogramin (MLS) use in Europe. J Antimicrob Chemother 2006; 58: 418–422.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pérez-Trallero E, Marimòn JM, Montes M, Orden B, de Pablos M: Clonal differences among erythromycin-resistant Streptococcus pyogenes in Spain. Emerg Infect Dis 1999; 5: 235–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Weiss K, de Azavedo J, Restieri C, Galarneau LA, Gourdeau M, Harvey P, Paradis JF, Salim K, Low DE: Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of macrolides-resistant group A streptococcus in the province of Quebec, Canada. J Antimicrob Chemother 2001; 47: 345–348.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Baquero F: Evolving resistance patterns of Streptococcus pneumoniae: a link with long-acting macrolide consumption?. J Chemother 1999; 11: 35–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Drusano GL, Craig WA: Relevance of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in the selection of antibiotics for respiratory tract infections. J Chemother 1997; 9: 38–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Montagnani.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Montagnani, F., Stolzuoli, L., Croci, L. et al. Erythromycin Resistance in Streptococcus pyogenes and Macrolide Consumption in a Central Italian Region. Infection 37, 353–357 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-008-8023-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s15010-008-8023-1

Keywords

Navigation