Abstract
This paper describes the theory of the actor-network, a body of theoretical and empirical writing which treats social relations, including power and organization, as network effects. The theory is distinctive because it insists that networks are materially heterogeneous and argues that society and organization would not exist if they were simply social. Agents, texts, devices, architectures are all generated in, form part of, and are essential to, the networks of the social. And in the first instance, all should be analyzed in the same terms. Accordingly, in this view, the task of sociology is to characterize the ways in which materials join together to generate themselves and reproduce institutional and organizational patterns in the networks of the social.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akrich, M. (1989a). De la position relative des localites: Systemes electriques et reseaux socio-politiques.Cahiers Centre d'Etudes l'Emploi 32, 117–166.
Akrich, M. (1989b). La construction d'un systeme socio-technique: Esquisse pour une anthropologie des techniques.Anthropol. Soc. 13, 31–54.
Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Beniger, J. R. (1986).The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Bourdieu, P. (1989).Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Routledge, London.
Bowker, G. (1988). Pictures from the Subsoil, 1939. In Fyfe, G., and Law, J. (eds.),Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Routledge, London.
Bowker, G. (1992). What's in a patent? In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Braudel, F. (1975).The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II (in two volumes), Fontana, London.
Callon, M. (1980). Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not. The socio-logic of translation. In Knorr-Cetina, K. D., Krohn, R., and Whitley, R. D. (eds.),The Social Process of Scientific Investigation: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation; domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (ed.),Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making; The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. J. (eds.),The Social Construction of Technological Systems, New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and Irreversibility. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.
Callon, M., and Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In Knorr-Cetina, K. D., and Cicourel, A. V. (eds.),Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward and Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston, Mass.
Callon, M., Law, J., and Rip, A. (eds.) (1986).Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, Macmillan, London.
Cambrosio, A.,et al. (1990). Representing biotechnology: An ethnography of Quebec science policy.Soc. Stud. Sci. 20, 195–227.
Chandler, A. D. (1977).The Visible Hand; the Managerial Revolution in American Business, Belknap, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Eisenstein, E. L. (1980).The Printing Press as an Agent of Change; Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Elias, N. (1978).The History of Manners, Blackwell, Oxford.
Foucault, M. (1979).Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Foucault, M. (1981).The History of Sexuality; Volume 1, An Introduction, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
Giddens, A. (1984).The Constitution of Society, Polity, Cambridge.
Goffman, E. (1968).Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
Goody, J. (1977).The Domestication of the Savage Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Hennion, A. (1985). Esthetique populaire ou theatralite theorique? Le peuple, le sociologue et le producteur a succes. InEsthetiques du Peuple, La Decouverte, Paris.
Hennion, A. (1989). An intermediary between production and consumption: The producer of popular music.Sci. Technol. Human Values 14, 400–424.
Hennion, A. (1990). De l'etude des medias a l'analyse de la mediation: Esquisse d'un problematique.MediasPouvoirs 20, 39–45.
Hennion, A., and Meadel, C. (1986). Programming music: Radio as mediator.Media, Culture Soc. 8, Sage, London.
Hennion, A., and Meadel, C. (1989). The artisans of desire: The mediation of advertising between product and consumer.Sociol. Theory 7, 191–209.
Hughes, T. P. (1983).Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
Ivins, W. M. (1975).On the Rationalization of Sight, Da Capo, New York.
Latour, B. (1985). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In Knorr-Cetina, K. D., and Mulkay, M. J. (eds.),Science Observed. Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, London, Sage.
Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In Law, J. (ed.),Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Latour, B. (1987).Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.
Latour, B. (1988a).The Pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Latour, B. (1988b).The Prince for machines as well as for machinations. In Elliott, B. (ed.),Technology and Social Process, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In Lynch, M., and Woolgar, S. (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Latour, B. (1991a).Nous N'Avons Jamais Été Modernes: Essai d'Anthropologie Symmetrique, Decouverte, Paris.
Latour, B. (1991b). Technology is society made durable. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.
Latour, B. (1992a). Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Latour, B. (1992b).Aramis ou l'amour des techniques, La Decouverte, Paris.
Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1979).Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage, Beverly Hills; reprinted, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986.
Law, J. (1986a). On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation, and the Portuguese route to India. In Law, J. (ed.),Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.
Law, J. (1986b). On power and its tactics: a view from the sociology of science.Sociol. Rev. 34, 1–38.
Law, J. (1987). Technology, closure and heterogeneous engineering: The case of the Portuguese expansion. In Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. J. (eds.).The Social Construction of Technological Systems, New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Law, J. (1991a). Power, discretion and strategy. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.
Law, J. (1991b). Monsters, machines and sociotechnical relations. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.
Law, J. (1992a). The Olympus 320 engine. A case study in design, autonomy and organisational control.Technol. Cult, forthcoming.
Law, J. (1992b).Modernity, Myth, and Materialism, Blackwell, Oxford, forthcoming.
Law, J., and Bijker, W. (1992). Technology, stability and social theory. In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Law, J., and Callon, M. (1988). Engineering and sociology in a military aircraft project: A network analysis of technological change.Soc. Prob. 35, 284–297.
Law, J., and Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Ong, W. J. (1982).Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, Routledge, London.
Rip, A. (1986). Mobilising resources through texts. In Callon, M., Law, J., and Rip, A. (eds.).Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, Macmillan, London.
Star, S. L. (1990a). What difference does it make where the mind is? Some questions for the history of neuropsychiatry.J. Neurol. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2, 436–443.
Star, S. L. (1990b). Layered space, formal representations and long-distance control: The politics of information.Fundamenta Sci. 10, 125–155.
Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technologies and the phenomenology of standards. On being allergic to onions. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.
Star, S. L. (1992). The skin, the skull and the self: Towards a sociology of the brain. In Harrington, A. (ed.),So Human a Brain: Knowledge and Values in the Neurosciences, Birkhauser, Boston, Mass.
Star, S. L., and Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.Soc. Stud. Sci. 19, 387–420.
Thompson, J. B. (1990).Ideology and Modern Culture, Polity, Cambridge.
Turkle, S. (1984).The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, Simon and Schuster, New York.
Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus,109, 121–136.
Woolgar, S. (1992). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Law, J. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5, 379–393 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830