Skip to main content
Log in

Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity

  • Papers
  • Published:
Systems practice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes the theory of the actor-network, a body of theoretical and empirical writing which treats social relations, including power and organization, as network effects. The theory is distinctive because it insists that networks are materially heterogeneous and argues that society and organization would not exist if they were simply social. Agents, texts, devices, architectures are all generated in, form part of, and are essential to, the networks of the social. And in the first instance, all should be analyzed in the same terms. Accordingly, in this view, the task of sociology is to characterize the ways in which materials join together to generate themselves and reproduce institutional and organizational patterns in the networks of the social.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akrich, M. (1989a). De la position relative des localites: Systemes electriques et reseaux socio-politiques.Cahiers Centre d'Etudes l'Emploi 32, 117–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akrich, M. (1989b). La construction d'un systeme socio-technique: Esquisse pour une anthropologie des techniques.Anthropol. Soc. 13, 31–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akrich, M. (1992). The description of technical objects. In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beniger, J. R. (1986).The Control Revolution: Technological and Economic Origins of the Information Society, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1989).Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. (1988). Pictures from the Subsoil, 1939. In Fyfe, G., and Law, J. (eds.),Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. (1992). What's in a patent? In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braudel, F. (1975).The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II (in two volumes), Fontana, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1980). Struggles and negotiations to define what is problematic and what is not. The socio-logic of translation. In Knorr-Cetina, K. D., Krohn, R., and Whitley, R. D. (eds.),The Social Process of Scientific Investigation: Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation; domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In Law, J. (ed.),Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1987). Society in the making; The study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. J. (eds.),The Social Construction of Technological Systems, New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and Irreversibility. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., and Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big Leviathan: How actors macrostructure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In Knorr-Cetina, K. D., and Cicourel, A. V. (eds.),Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward and Integration of Micro- and Macro-Sociologies, Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M., Law, J., and Rip, A. (eds.) (1986).Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambrosio, A.,et al. (1990). Representing biotechnology: An ethnography of Quebec science policy.Soc. Stud. Sci. 20, 195–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, A. D. (1977).The Visible Hand; the Managerial Revolution in American Business, Belknap, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstein, E. L. (1980).The Printing Press as an Agent of Change; Communications and Cultural Transformations in Early-Modern Europe, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1978).The History of Manners, Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979).Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1981).The History of Sexuality; Volume 1, An Introduction, Penguin, Harmondsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984).The Constitution of Society, Polity, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1968).Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates, Harmondsworth, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goody, J. (1977).The Domestication of the Savage Mind, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (1985). Esthetique populaire ou theatralite theorique? Le peuple, le sociologue et le producteur a succes. InEsthetiques du Peuple, La Decouverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (1989). An intermediary between production and consumption: The producer of popular music.Sci. Technol. Human Values 14, 400–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A. (1990). De l'etude des medias a l'analyse de la mediation: Esquisse d'un problematique.MediasPouvoirs 20, 39–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A., and Meadel, C. (1986). Programming music: Radio as mediator.Media, Culture Soc. 8, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennion, A., and Meadel, C. (1989). The artisans of desire: The mediation of advertising between product and consumer.Sociol. Theory 7, 191–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T. P. (1983).Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880–1930, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivins, W. M. (1975).On the Rationalization of Sight, Da Capo, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1985). Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In Knorr-Cetina, K. D., and Mulkay, M. J. (eds.),Science Observed. Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, London, Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1986). The powers of association. In Law, J. (ed.),Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1987).Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988a).The Pasteurization of France, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988b).The Prince for machines as well as for machinations. In Elliott, B. (ed.),Technology and Social Process, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In Lynch, M., and Woolgar, S. (eds.),Representation in Scientific Practice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1991a).Nous N'Avons Jamais Été Modernes: Essai d'Anthropologie Symmetrique, Decouverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1991b). Technology is society made durable. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters: Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1992a). Where are the missing masses? Sociology of a few mundane artefacts. In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1992b).Aramis ou l'amour des techniques, La Decouverte, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B., and Woolgar, S. (1979).Laboratory Life: The Social Construction of Scientific Facts, Sage, Beverly Hills; reprinted, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1986a). On the methods of long-distance control: Vessels, navigation, and the Portuguese route to India. In Law, J. (ed.),Power, Action and Belief. A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1986b). On power and its tactics: a view from the sociology of science.Sociol. Rev. 34, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1987). Technology, closure and heterogeneous engineering: The case of the Portuguese expansion. In Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., and Pinch, T. J. (eds.).The Social Construction of Technological Systems, New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1991a). Power, discretion and strategy. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1991b). Monsters, machines and sociotechnical relations. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J. (1992a). The Olympus 320 engine. A case study in design, autonomy and organisational control.Technol. Cult, forthcoming.

  • Law, J. (1992b).Modernity, Myth, and Materialism, Blackwell, Oxford, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., and Bijker, W. (1992). Technology, stability and social theory. In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., and Callon, M. (1988). Engineering and sociology in a military aircraft project: A network analysis of technological change.Soc. Prob. 35, 284–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., and Callon, M. (1992). The life and death of an aircraft: A network analysis of technical change. In Bijker, W. E., and Law, J. (eds.),Shaping Technology-Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, W. J. (1982).Orality and Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A. (1986). Mobilising resources through texts. In Callon, M., Law, J., and Rip, A. (eds.).Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World, Macmillan, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1990a). What difference does it make where the mind is? Some questions for the history of neuropsychiatry.J. Neurol. Clin. Neuropsychol. 2, 436–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1990b). Layered space, formal representations and long-distance control: The politics of information.Fundamenta Sci. 10, 125–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1991). Power, technologies and the phenomenology of standards. On being allergic to onions. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L. (1992). The skin, the skull and the self: Towards a sociology of the brain. In Harrington, A. (ed.),So Human a Brain: Knowledge and Values in the Neurosciences, Birkhauser, Boston, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., and Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39.Soc. Stud. Sci. 19, 387–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. B. (1990).Ideology and Modern Culture, Polity, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkle, S. (1984).The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit, Simon and Schuster, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics?Daedalus,109, 121–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolgar, S. (1992). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In Law, J. (ed.),A Sociology of Monsters. Essays on Power, Technology and Domination, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Law, J. Notes on the theory of the actor-network: Ordering, strategy, and heterogeneity. Systems Practice 5, 379–393 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01059830

Key words

Navigation