Skip to main content
Log in

Malignant melanoma incidence in Connecticut (United States): time trends and age-period-cohort modeling by anatomic site

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Cancer Causes & Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined time trends and age-period-cohort patterns in the incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) by gender and anatomic site in Connecticut (United States) between 1950 and 1989, using data from the population-based Connecticut Tumor Registry. A total of 8,249 invasive CMM incident cases were included. Cases were grouped into melanomas of the head and neck, upper limb, lower limb, and trunk. Between 1950 and 1989, rates increased substantially for all sites. The largest relative increases occurred in melanoma of the upper limb for both males and females; the largest absolute increase occurred for melanoma of the trunk in males; and the smallest increase occurred in head and neck melanoma in females. Recent trends for time periods 1970–89 among birth cohorts 1930–69 indicated that the rate of increase of CMM is slowing substantially among males, but not among females. Nevertheless, continued overall increases in CMM incidence are likely in Connecticut in the 1990s in both genders, with a decrease in the male-female ratio. The age-period-cohort patterns were significantly different between the genders and among anatomic sites, suggesting different trends in carcinogenic exposures (mainly ultraviolet radiation from the sun) or etiologic distinctions between males and females and among the sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jensen OM, Bolander AM. Trends in malignant melanoma of the skin.World Health Stat 1980;33: 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Roush GC, Holford TR, Schymura MJ, White C.Cancer Risk and Incidence Trends. The Connecticut Perspective. Washington, DC (US): Hemisphere Publishing, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  3. MacLennan R, Green AC, McLeod GRC, Martin NG. Increasing incidence of cutaneous melanoma in Queensland, Australia.JNCI 1992;84: 1427–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Osterlind A, Engholm G, Jensen OM. Trends in cutaneous malignant melanoma in Denmark 1943–1982 by anatomic sites.APMIS 198896: 953–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thorn M, Bergstrom R, Adami H-O, Ringborg U. Trends in the incidence of malignant melanoma in Sweden, by anatomic site, 1960–1984.Am J Epidemiol 1990;132: 1066–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Magnus K. Habits of sun exposure and risk of malignant melanoma: An analysis of incidence rates in Norway 1955–1977 by cohort, sex, age, and primary tumor site.Cancer 1981;48: 2329–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Houghton A, Flannery J, Viola MV. Malignant melanoma in Connecticut and Denmark.Int J Cancer 1980;25: 95–104.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stevens RG, Moolgavkar SH. Malignant melanoma: dependence of site-specific risk on age.Am J Epidemiol 1984;119: 890–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyle P, Day N, Magnus K. Mathematical modeling of malignant melanoma trends in Norway, 1953–1978.Am J Epidemiol 1983;118: 887–96.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Roush GC, Schymura MJ, Holford TR. Patterns of invasive melanoma in the Connecticut Tumor Registry: Is the long-term increase real?Cancer 1988;61: 2586–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dennis LK, White E, Lee JAH. Recent cohort trends in malignant melanoma by anatomic site in the United States.Cancer Causes Control 1993;4: 93–100.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heston JF, Kelly JAB, Meigs JW, Flannery JT. Forty-five years of cancer incidence in Connecticut 1935–1979.NCI Monogr 1986;70: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization.International Classification of Diseases for Oncology. 1st edn. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  14. International Agency for Research on Cancer and the National Cancer Institute.International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Field Trial Edition. Lyon, France: IARC, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holford TR. Understanding the effects of age, period, and cohort on incidence and mortality rates.Ann Rev Public Health 1991;12: 425–47.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baker RG, Nelder JA.The GLIM system: Release 3. Oxford, UK: Numerical Algorithms Group, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Clayton D, Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. I. Age-period and age-cohort models.Stat Med 1987;6: 449–67.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Clayton D, Schifflers E. Models for temporal variation in cancer rates. II. Age-period and age-cohort models.Stat Med 1987;6: 469–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Green A, MacLennan R, Youl P, Martin N. Site distribution of cutaneous melanoma in Queensland.Int J Cancer 1993;53: 232–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Osterlind A, Hou-Jensen K, Jensen OM. Incidence of cutaneous malignant melanoma in Denmark 1978–1982. Anatomic site distribution, histologic type, and comparison with non-melanoma skin cancer.Br J Cancer 1988;58: 385–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scotto J, Pitcher H, Lee JAH. Indications of future decreasing trends in skin-melanoma mortality among Whites in the United States.Int J Cancer 1991;49: 490–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van der Esch EP, Muir CS, Nectoux J, et al. Temporal change in diagnostic criteria as a cause of the increase of malignant melanoma over time is unlikely.Int J Cancer 1991;47: 483–90.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Koh HK. Cutaneous melanoma.N Engl J Med 1991;325: 171–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Armstrong BK. Epidemiology of melanoma: intermittent or total accumulated exposure to the sun?J Dermatol Surg Oncol 1988;14: 835–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Young SW. A list of photosensitizing agents of interest to the dermatologist.Bull Assoc Milit Derm, 1964;13: 33–5.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lamberg SI. A new photosensitizer.JAMA 1967;201: 121–4.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ashwood-Smith MJ. Possible cancer hazard associated with 5-methoxypsoralen in suntan preparationsBr Med J 1979;2: 1144.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stoica A, Hoffman M, Marta L, Voiculetz N. Estradiol and progesterone receptors in human cutaneous melanoma.Neoplasma 1991;38: 137–45.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Osterlind A. Hormonal and reproductive factors in melanoma risk.Clin Dermatol 1992;10: 75–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Walter SD, Marrett LD, Shannon HS, Form L, Hertzman C. The association of cutaneous malignant melanoma and fluorescent light exposure.Am J Epidemiol 1992;135: 749–62.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Elwood JM. Could melanoma be caused by fluorescent light? A review of relevant epidemiology.Rec Res Cancer Res 1985;102: 127–36.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Walter SD, Marrett LD, Form L, Hertzman C, Shannon HS, Roy P. The association of cutaneous malignant melanoma with the use of sunbeds and sunlamps.Am J Epidemiol 1990;131: 232–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Clark WH Jr, Mihm MC Jr. Lentigo maligna and lentigo-maligna melanoma.Am J Pathol 1969;55: 39.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Green A. A theory of site distribution of melanomas: Queensland, Australia.Cancer Causes Control 1992;3: 513–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This study was supported by the National Institute of Health grant # CA-62986, and #CA-30931. Dr Dubrow received support from a National Cancer Institute Preventive Oncology Academic Award (K07-CA01463).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, YT., Zheng, T., Holford, T.R. et al. Malignant melanoma incidence in Connecticut (United States): time trends and age-period-cohort modeling by anatomic site. Cancer Causes Control 5, 341–350 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01804985

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01804985

Key words

Navigation