Abstract
The least restrictive alternative concept is widely used in mental health law. This paper addresses how the concept has been applied to treatment decisions. The paper offers both a legal and a behavioral analysis to some problems that have emerged in recent years concerning the selection of behavioral procedures used to change client behavior. The paper also offers ways of improving the application of the concept, which involve developing a more behaviorally functional perspective toward restrictiveness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Accreditation Council for Services for Mentally Retarded and Other Developmentally Disabled Persons. (1980). Standards for services for developmentally disabled individuals. Washington, DC: Author.
Behavioral programming. (1989). Tallahassee, FL: Developmental Services Program Office, Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services.
Catania, A. C. (1984). Learning. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Churchill Bd. of Ed. v. LeFleur, 414 U.S. 632 (1972).
Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330 (1972).
Finesmith, B. K. (1970). An historical and systematic overview of Wisconsin’s behavior management guidelines. The Behavior Therapist, 2, 3–6.
Friedman, P. R. (1975). Legal regulation of applied behavior analysis in mental institutions and prisons. Arizona Law Review, 17(1), 39–104.
Gary W. v. State of Louisiana, 437 F. Supp. 1209, 1216 (E.D. La. 1976).
Guidelines on behavior management. (1975). Tallahassee, FL: Florida Division of Retardation.
In re Borgogna, 121 Cal. App. 3d 932 (1981).
Johnston, J. M., & Shook, G. L. (1987). Developing behavior analysis at the state level. The Behavior Analyst, 10, 199–233.
Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Act, Calif. Welf. & Inst. Code, 4502. Lessard v. Schmidt, 349 F. Supp. 1078 (E.D. Wis. 1972).
May, J. G., Risley, T. R., Twardosz, S., Friedman, P., Bijou, S. W., & Wexler, D. (1976). Guidelines for the use of behavioral procedures in state programs for retarded persons. Arlington, TX: National Association of Retarded Citizens Press.
McGrath, L., & Keilitz, R. J. (1984). The least restrictive alternative in Los Angeles County civil commitments. Whittier Law Review, 6, 35–38.
Myers, J. E. B., Jenson, W. R., & McMahon, W. M. (Eds.). (1986). Legal and educational issues affecting autistic children. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Parry, L. (1985). Least restrictive alternative: An overview of the concept. Mental and Physical Disabilities Law Reporter, 9, 963–972.
Reese, R. M. (1984). Ensuring the right to minimally adequate habilitation: A proposed role for human rights committees. Mental Retardation, 22(3), 142–146.
Repp, A., & Deitz, D. (1978). Ethical issues in reducing responding of institutionalized mentally retarded persons. Mental Retardation, 16, 45–46.
Romeo V. Youngberg, 644 F.2d 147 (3d Cir. 1980).
Schifani, J. W., Anderson, H. M., & Odle, S. J. (Eds.). (1980). Implementing learning in the least restrictive environment: Handicapped children in the mainstream. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479 (1960).
Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963).
Sidman, M. (1989). Coercion and its fallout. Boston, MA: Authors’ Cooperative.
Skinner, B. F. (1971). Beyond freedom and dignity. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
Spence v. Washington, 418 U.S. 405 (1976).
Taylor, S.J. (1988). Caught in the continuum: A critical analysis of the principle of the least restrictive environment. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13, 41–53.
Turnbull, H. R. (Ed.). (1981). The least restrictive alternative: Principles and practices. Washington, DC: American Association for Mental Deficiency.
Wuori v. Zitnay, No. 85–80 SD (D. Maine, July, 1978).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Johnston, J.M., Sherman, R.A. Applying the Least Restrictive Alternative Principle to Treatment Decisions: A Legal and Behavioral Analysis. BEHAV ANALYST 16, 103–115 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392615
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392615