Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of umbilical vein blood flow on perinatal outcome of fetuses with lean and/or hypo-coiled umbilical cord

  • Materno-fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the effect of umbilical vein (UV) blood flow measured by color-directed pulsed-wave Doppler on perinatal outcome of fetuses with lean and/or hypocoiled umbilical cord after 24 weeks of gestation.

Methods

Two hundred and forty-four women with singleton fetus after 24 weeks of gestation were studied. Umbilical cord area, umbilical vessel cross-sectional area and antenatal umbilical coiling index (UCI) were calculated and compared with Doppler parameters including UV blood flow volume in ml/min/kg, UV peak systolic velocity in cm/s, and umbilical artery pulsatility index.

Results

Thirty-eight (15.5%) fetuses had lean umbilical cord (area < 10th percentile). A significant difference between fetuses with and those without lean cord was found in terms of: UCI (0.17 ± 0.06 vs. 0.35 ± 0.08, P < 0.001), cord cross-sectional area (89.6 ± 11.7 vs. 198.7 ± 33.7 mm2, P < 0.001), Wharton’s jelly amount (36.5 ± 11.2 vs. 125.2 ± 34.1 mm2, P < 0.001), UV blood flow (83.4 ± 15.8 vs. 131.0 ± 19.8 ml/min/kg, P < 0.001), and UV blood flow mean velocity (8.6 ± 3.7 vs. 12.1 ± 2.8 cm/s, P < 0.05). A significant positive correlation was found between antenatal UCI and UV blood flow (r = 0.73, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Fetuses with lean and/or hypo-coiled umbilical cord showed a noticeable decrease in UV blood flow of sufficient magnitude that could affect fetal growth, and this could explain the higher prevalence of fetal intrapartum complications in growth-restricted fetuses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Di Nero E, Chezzi F, Raio L, Franchi M, D’addrio V (2001) Umbilical cord morphology and pregnancy outcome. Eur J Obstet Gnecol Reprod Biol 69:150–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruch JF, Sibony O, Benali K, Challer C, Blot P, Nessmann C (1997) Computerized microscope morphometry of umbilical vessels from pregnancies with intrauterine growth retardation and abnormal umbilical artery Doppler. Hum Pathol 28:1139–1145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Delaat M, Franx A, Nickkels PGD, Visser GHA (2006) Prenatal ultrasonographic prediction of the umbilical coiling index at birth and adverse perinatal outcome. Ultrasound Obestet Gynecol 28:704–709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Galan HL, Jozwik M, Rigano S, Regnault TR, Hobbins JC, Battaglia FC, Ferrazzi E (1999) Umbilical vein blood flow determination in the ovine fetus: comparison of Doppler ultrasonographic and steady-state diffusion techniques. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1149–1153

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rigano S, Bozzo M, Ferrazzi E, Bellotti M, Battaglia FC, Galan HL (2001) Early and persistent reduction in umbilical vein blood flow in the growth-restricted fetus: a longitudinal study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185:834–838

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Strong TH, Finberg HJ, Mattox JH (1994) Antepartum diagnosis of noncoiled umbilical cords. Am J Obstet Gynecol 170:1729–1733

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Raio L, Ghezzi F, Di Naro E et al (1999) Prenatal diagnosis of a “lean” umbilical cord: a simple marker for fetuses at risk of being small for gestational age at birth. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barbieri C, Cecatti JG, Souza CE, Marussi EF, Costa JV (2008) Inter- and intra-observer variability in sonographic measurements of the cross-sectional diameters and area of the umbilical cord and its vessels during pregnancy. Reprod Health 5:5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sebire NJ (2007) Patho-physiological significance of abnormal umbilical cord coiling index. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 30(6):804–806

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiserud T, Eik-Nes H, Blaas HG, Hellevik LR, Simensen B (1994) Ductus venosus blood velocity and the umbilical circulation in seriously growth retarded fetuses. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 4:109–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barbera A, Galan HL, Ferrazzi E, Rigano S, Jozwik M, Battaglia FC, Pardi G (1999) Relationship of umbilical vein blood flow to growth parameters in the human fetus. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:174–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Naro E, Ghezzi F, Raio L et al (2001) Umbilical vein blood flow in fetuses with normal and lean umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 17:224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Di Naro E, Raio L, Ghezzi F et al (2002) Longitudinal changes of the umbilical vein blood flow in normal and growth retarded fetuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:527

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Silver RK, Dooley SL, Tamura RK (2001) Umbilical cord size and amniotic fluid volume in prolonged pregnancy. Am J Obestet Gynecol 18:348

    Google Scholar 

  15. Labarrere C, Sebastiani M, Siminovich E (1985) Absence of Wharton’s jelly around the umbilical arteries: an unusual cause of perinatal mortality. Placenta 6:555

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malpas P, Symonds EM (1966) Observations on the structure of the human umbilical cord. Surg Gynecol Obstet 123:746–750

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ghezzi F, Raio L, Dinero E, Franchi M, Balestreri D, D’addario V (2001) Nomogram of Wharton’s jelly as depicted in the sonographic cross section of the umbilical cord. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:121–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Otsubo Y, Yoneyama Y, Suzuki S, Sawa R, Araki T (1999) Sonographic evaluation of umbilical cord insertion with umbilical coiling index. J Clin Ultrasound 27(6):340–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Georgiou HM, Rice GE, Walker SP, Wein P, Gude NM, Permezel M (2001) The effect of vascular coiling on venous perfusion during experimental umbilical cord encirclement. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184:673–678

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Degani S, Lewingsky RM, Berger H, Spiegel D (1995) Sonographic estimation of umbilical coiling index and correlation with Doppler flow characteristics. Obstet Gynecol 86:990–993

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Predanic M, Perni SC, Chervenak FA (2006) Antenatal umbilical coiling index and Doppler flow characteristics. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 28(5):699–703

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reynolds SRM (1978) Mechanisms of placento fetal blood flow. Obstet Gynecol 51:245–249

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manal M. El behery.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

El behery, M.M., Nouh, A.A., Alanwar, A.M. et al. Effect of umbilical vein blood flow on perinatal outcome of fetuses with lean and/or hypo-coiled umbilical cord. Arch Gynecol Obstet 283, 53–58 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1272-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1272-0

Keywords

Navigation