Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of work related confounders on the association between silica exposure and lung cancer: a nested case-control study among Chinese miners and pottery workers

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The role of silica in the causation of lung cancer is an ongoing debate. In order to explore whether observed association between silica exposure and lung cancer is confounded by exposure to other occupational carcinogens, we updated a previously nested case-control study among a cohort of male workers in 29 Chinese mines and factories on the basis of an extended follow-up.

Methods

Five hundred and eleven lung cancer cases and 1,879 matched controls were selected. Exposure to respirable silica as well as relevant occupational confounders were quantitatively assessed based on historical industrial hygiene data. The relationship between exposure to silica and lung cancer was analyzed by conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for exposure to arsenic, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), radon, and smoking.

Results

In a crude analysis adjusted for smoking only, a significant trend of increasing risk of lung cancer with exposure to silica was found for tin, iron/copper miners, and pottery workers. But after adjustment for relevant occupational confounders, no relationship between silica and lung cancer can be observed. Instead, there is a significant association between lung cancer mortality and cumulative exposure to inorganic arsenic (OR = 1.86, 95% CI: 1.14, 3.04 for each mg/m3-year increase) and carcinogenic PAHs (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.08, 1.69 for each 100 μg/m3-year increase).

Conclusion

This analysis does not provide any evidence to show that exposure to silica causes lung cancer in the absence of confounding factors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Checkoway H, Franzblau A (2000) Is silicosis required for silica-associated lung cancer? Am J Ind Med 37:252–259

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Checkoway H, Heyer NJ, Demers PA, et al (1996) Reanalysis of mortality from lung cancer among diatomaceous earth industry workers, with consideration of potential confounding by asbestos exposure. Occup Environ Med 53(9):645–647

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, McLaughlin JK, Zhang JY, et al (1992) Mortality among dust-exposed Chinese mine and pottery workers. J Occup Med 34:311–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Chen J (2002) Nested case-control study of lung cancer in four Chinese tin mines. Occup Environ Med 59:113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cocco P, Rice CH, Chen JQ, et al (2001) Lung cancer risk, silica exposure, and silicosis in Chinese mines and pottery factories: the modifying role of other workplace lung carcinogens. Am J Ind Med 40:674–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dosemeci M, Chen JQ, Hearl F, et al (1993) Estimating historical exposure to silica among mine and pottery workers in the People’s Republic of China. Am J Ind Med 24:55–66

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher JW (2002) PET scanning and the solitary pulmonary nodule. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 14:268–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hessel PA, Gamble JF, Gee JB, et al (2000) Silica, silicosis, and lung cancer: a response to a recent working group report. J Occup Environ Med 42:704–720

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hessel PA, Gamble JF, Nicolich M (2003) Relationship between silicosis and smoking. Scand J Work Environ Health 29:329–336

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IARC (1997) Monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans, vol 68. Silica, some silicates, coal dust, and para-aramid fibrils. WHO, Lyon

  • Kurihara N, Wada O (2004) Silicosis and smoking strongly increase lung cancer risk in silica-exposed workers. Ind Health 42:303–314

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin JK, Chen JQ, Dosemeci M, et al (1992) A nested case-control study of lung cancer among silica exposed workers in China. Br J Ind Med 49(3):167–171

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JD, Islam SS, Ducatman AM, et al (1997) Prevalence of small lung opacities in populations unexposed to dusts. A literature analysis. Chest 111:404–410

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steenland K, Mannetje A, Boffetta P, et al (2001) International agency for research on cancer. pooled exposure-response analyses and risk assessment for lung cancer in 10 cohorts of silica-exposed workers: an IARC multicentre study. Cancer Causes Control 12:773–784

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z, Hearl F, Peng K, et al (1992) Current occupational exposure in Chinese iron and copper mines. Appl Occup Environ Hyg 7:735–743

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang Z, Hearl FJ, Odencrantz J, et al (2001) Estimating historical respirable crystalline silica exposures for Chinese pottery workers and iron/copper, tin, and tungsten miners. Ann Occup Hyg 45:631–642

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Sun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chen, W., Bochmann, F. & Sun, Y. Effects of work related confounders on the association between silica exposure and lung cancer: a nested case-control study among Chinese miners and pottery workers. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 80, 320–326 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-006-0137-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-006-0137-0

Keywords

Navigation