Skip to main content
Log in

Next steps: envisioning a research agenda

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The topic of diagnostic error is a relatively new one in the academic arena and lacks an organized research agenda. Participants at “Diagnostic Error in Medicine— 2008” formally considered this issue and provided initial suggestions. Recommendations were made to standardize taxonomies and definitions, especially in regard to what constitutes a delay in diagnosis. Error discovery needs emphasis, especially with autopsies becoming a rarity. Developing standardized tools to study diagnostic error in laboratory-like conditions was viewed as a top priority. Many issues were reviewed in regard to error generation (what conditions are error-prone, what is the role of the clinicians expertise, etc.), and error reduction. These included both system-level and cognitive interventions, with specific suggestions for each dimension.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battles, J. B., & Shea, C. E. (2001). A system of analyzing medical errors to improve GME curricula and programs. Academic Medicine, 76, 125–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berner, E. S., & Graber, M. L. (2008). Overconfidence as a cause of diagnostic error in medicine. American Journal of Medicine, 121, S2–S23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croskerry, P. (2003). Cognitive forcing strategies in clinical decision making. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 41, 110–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graber, M. L., Franklin, N., & Gordon, R. R. (2005). Diagnostic error in internal medicine. Archives of Internal Medicine, 165, 1493–1499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofer, T. P., & Hayward, R. A. (2002). Are bad outcomes from questionable clinical decisions preventable medical errors? A case of cascade iatrogenesis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 137, 327–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, L., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. (1999). To err is human; building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamede, S., Schmidt, H. G., & Rikers, R. (2007). Diagnostic errors and reflective practice in medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 13, 138–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pronovost, P. J., Thompson, D. A., Holzmueller, C. G., Lubomski, L. H., & Morlock, L. L. (2005). Defining and measuring patient safety. Critical Care Clinics, 21, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, H., Petersen, L. A., & Thomas, E. J. (2006). Understanding diagnostic errors in medicine: A lesson from aviation. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 15, 159–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wears, R. L., & Schiff, G. D. (2005). One cheer for feedback. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 45, 24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark L. Graber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Graber, M.L. Next steps: envisioning a research agenda. Adv in Health Sci Educ 14 (Suppl 1), 107–112 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9183-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9183-1

Keywords

Navigation