Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

CBCRisk-Black: a personalized contralateral breast cancer risk prediction model for black women

  • Epidemiology
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Black breast cancer (BC) survivors have a higher risk of developing contralateral breast cancer (CBC) than Whites. Existing CBC risk prediction tools are developed based on mostly White women. To address this racial disparity, it is crucial to develop tools tailored for Black women to help them inform about their actual risk of CBC.

Methods

We propose an absolute risk prediction model, CBCRisk-Black, specifically for Black BC patients. It uses data on Black women from two sources: Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER). First, a matched lasso logistic regression model for estimating relative risks (RR) is developed. Then, it is combined with relevant hazard rates and attributable risks to obtain absolute risks. Six-fold cross-validation is used to internally validate CBCRisk-Black. We also compare CBCRisk-Black with CBCRisk, an existing CBC risk prediction model.

Results

The RR model uses data from BCSC on 744 Black women (186 cases). CBCRisk-Black has four risk factors (RR compared to baseline): breast density (2.13 for heterogeneous/extremely dense), family history of BC (2.28 for yes), first BC tumor size (2.14 for T3/T4, 1.56 for TIS), and age at first diagnosis of BC (1.41 for < 40). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for 3- and 5-year predictions are 0.72 and 0.65 for CBCRisk-Black while those are 0.65 and 0.60 for CBCRisk.

Conclusion

CBCRisk-Black may serve as a useful tool to clinicians in counseling Black BC patients by providing a more accurate and personalized CBC risk estimate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

Data availability

BCSC data can be requested at https://www.bcsc-research.org/. SEER data can be requested at https://seer.cancer.gov/.

Code availability

Software implementing CBCRisk-Black will be available at https://personal.utdallas.edu/~swati.biswas/.

References

  1. Cancer Facts & Figures 2020. (2020). https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-facts-figures/cancer-facts-figures-2020.html. Accessed 27 July 2021

  2. Race/Ethnicity. (2020). https://www.breastcancer.org/risk/factors/race_ethnicity. Accessed 30 Dec 2021

  3. Gao X, Fisher SG, Emami B (2003) Risk of second primary cancer in the contralateral breast in women treated for early-stage breast cancer: a population-based study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 56(4):1038–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giannakeas V, Lim DW, Narod SA (2021) The risk of contralateral breast cancer: a SEER-based analysis. Br J Cancer 1–10

  5. Watt GP, John EM, Bandera EV, Malone KE, Lynch CF, Palmer JR, Bernstein JL (2021) Race, ethnicity and risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer in the United States. Int J Cancer 148(11):2748–2758

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Xiong Z, Yang L, Deng G, Huang X, Li X, Xie X, Wang X (2018) Patterns of occurrence and outcomes of contralateral breast cancer: analysis of SEER data. J Clin Med 7(6):133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chowdhury M, Euhus D, Onega T, Biswas S, Choudhary PK (2017) A model for individualized risk prediction of contralateral breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 161(1):153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ (1989) Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81(24):1879–1886

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Basu NN, Ross G, Evans D, Barr L (2015) The Manchester guidelines for contralateral risk-reducing mastectomy. World J Surg Oncol 13(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Giardiello D, Steyerberg EW, Hauptmann M, Adank MA, Akdeniz D, Blomqvist C, Chang-Claude J (2019) Prediction and clinical utility of a contralateral breast cancer risk model. Breast Cancer Res 21(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chowdhury M, Euhus D, Arun B, Umbricht C, Biswas S, Choudhary P (2018) Validation of a personalized risk prediction model for contralateral breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 170(2):415–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Giardiello D, Hauptmann M, Steyerberg EW, Adank MA, Akdeniz D, Blom JC, Brinkhuis M (2020) Prediction of contralateral breast cancer: external validation of risk calculators in 20 international cohorts. Breast Cancer Res Treat 181(2):423–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Breast Cancer Surveillence Consortium. (2021). https://www.bcsc-research.org/. Accessed 27 July, 2021

  14. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. (2021). https://seer.cancer.gov/. Accessed 27 July 2021

  15. James G, Witten D, Hastie T, Tibshirani R (2013) An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Spinger.

  16. Kattan MW, Gerds TA (2018) The index of prediction accuracy: an intuitive measure useful for evaluating risk prediction models. Diagnostic Prognostic Res 2(1):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Reid S, Tibshirani R (2014) Regularization paths for conditional logistic regression: the clogitL1 package. J Statist Softwa 58(12)

  18. Orom H, Kiviniemi MT, Shavers VL, Ross L, Underwood W (2013) Perceived risk for breast cancer and its relationship to mammography in Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites. J Behav Med 36(5):466–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Data collection was supported in part by the National Cancer Institute-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (HHSN261201100031C and P01CA154292). The collection of BCSC cancer and vital status data was supported in part by several state public health departments and cancer registries throughout the U.S. (http://www.bcsc-research.org/work/acknowledgement.html). All statements in this report, including its findings and conclusions, are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the National Cancer Institute or National Institutes of Health. We thank the participating women, mammography facilities, and radiologists for the data they have provided. You can learn more about the BCSC at: http://www.bcsc-research.org/. We thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments and suggestions, which have led to an improved manuscript.

Funding

This project was partially funded by the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health (Grant Number R21 CA186086).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Pankaj K. Choudhary or Swati Biswas.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declare the that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This study (secondary analysis) was approved by the University of Texas at Dallas IRB.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 36 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sajal, I.H., Chowdhury, M., Wang, T. et al. CBCRisk-Black: a personalized contralateral breast cancer risk prediction model for black women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 194, 179–186 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06612-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-022-06612-5

Keywords