Abstract
Individuals experiencing homelessness have disproportionately high rates of health problems. Those who perceive themselves as having greater access to their social support networks have better physical and mental health outcomes as well as lower rates of victimization. Mobile phones offer a connection to others without the physical constraints of landlines and, therefore, may make communication (e.g., access to one’s social support networks) more feasible for homeless individuals. This, in turn, could lead toward better health outcomes. This exploratory study examined mobile phone possession and use among a sample of 100 homeless men and women who do not use the shelter system in Philadelphia, PA. Interviews were comprised of the Homeless Supplement to the Diagnostic Interview Schedule, a technology module created for this investigation, and the substance use and psychiatric sections of the Addiction Severity Index. Almost half (44%) of the sample had a mobile phone. In the past 30 days, 100% of those with mobile phones placed or received a call, over half (61%) sent or received a text message, and one fifth (20%) accessed the Internet via their mobile phone. Participants possessed and used mobile phones to increase their sense of safety, responsibility (employment, stable housing, personal business, and sobriety or “clean time”), and social connectedness. Mobile phones could potentially be used by public health/health care providers to disseminate information to the street homeless, to enhance communication between the street homeless and providers, and to increase access for the street homeless to prevention, intervention, and aftercare services. Finally, this technology could also be used by researchers to collect data with this transient population.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ramin B, Svoboda T. Health of the homeless and climate change. J Urban Health. 2009; 86(4): 654–664.
Hwang SW. Mortality among men using homeless shelters in Toronto, Ontario. JAMA. 2000; 283(16): 2152–2157.
Lee TC, Hanlon JG, Ben-David J, et al. Risk factors for cardiovascular disease in homeless adults. Circulation. 2005; 111: 2629–2635.
Snyder LD, Eisner MD. Obstructive lung disease among the urban homeless. Chest. 2005; 125: 1719–1725.
Hwang SW, Kirst MJ, Chiu S, et al. Multidimensional social support and the health of homeless individuals. J Urban Health. 2009; 86(5): 791–803.
Harris Interactive. Cell phone usage continues to increase. The Harris Poll #36. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=890. Accessed 3 Nov 2009.
In US, SMS Text Messaging Tops Mobile Phone Calling. http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/in-us-text-messaging-tops-mobile-phone-calling/. Accessed 12 Feb 2010.
Horrigan, J. Mobile access to data and information, March 2008. http://www.pewinternet.org/~/media//Files/Reports/2008/PIP_Mobile.Data.Access.pdf.pdf. Accessed 12 Feb 2010.
Office of Community Planning and Development. The 2008 Annual Homeless Assessment Report to Congress. US Department of Housing and Urban Development; 2009.
Shelton KH, Taylor PJ, Bonner A, Van den Bree M. Risk factors for homelessness: evidence from a population-based study. Psychiatr Serv. 2009; 60(4): 465–472.
Freedman MJ, Lester KM, McNamara C, Milby JB, Schumacher JE. Cell phones for ecological momentary assessment with cocaine-addicted homeless patients in treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2006; 30: 105–111.
Cottler LB, Compton WM, Abdallah AB, et al. Peer-delivered interventions reduce HIV risk behaviors among out-of-treatment drug abusers. Public Health Rep. 1998; 113(Supp 1): 31–41.
North CS, Eyrich KM, Pollio DE, Cottler LB, Spitznagel EL. The homeless supplement to the diagnostic interview schedule: test–retest analyses. Int J Method Psych. 2004; 13(3): 184–191.
McLellan AT, Kushner H, Metzger D, et al. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1992; 9(3): 199–213.
Argeriou M, McCarty D, Mulvey K, Daley M. Use of the addiction severity index with homeless substance abusers. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1994; 11(4): 359–365.
Zanis DA, McLellan AT, Cnaan RA, Randall M. Reliability and validity of the Addiction Severity Index with a homeless sample. J Subst Abuse Treat. 1994; 11(6): 541–548.
Patton MQ. Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 2002.
Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 1998.
Sullivan NP. Cell phones provide significant economic gains for low-income American households: A review of the literature and data from two new surveys. http://newmillenniumresearch.org/archive/Sullivan_Report_032608.pdf. Accessed 3 Nov 2009.
Dietz TL, Wright JD. Age and gender differences and predictors of victimization of the older homeless. J Elder Abuse Negl. 2005; 17(1): 37–60.
Kramer CB, Gibran NS, Heimbach DM, Rivara FP, Klein MB. Assault and substance abuse characterize burn injuries in homeless patients. J Burn Care Res. 2008; 29: 461–467.
Wenzel SL, Tucker JS, Hambarsoomian K, Elliott MN. Toward a more comprehensive understanding of violence against impoverished women. J Interpers Violence. 2006; 21: 820–839.
Eyrich KM, Pollio DE, North CS. An exploration of alienation and replacement theories of social support in homelessness. Soc Work Res. 2003; 27(4): 222–231.
Fischer PJ, Shapiro S, Breakey WR, Anthony JC, Kramer M. Mental health and social characteristics of the homeless: a survey of mission users. Am J Public Health. 1986; 76(5): 519–524.
Solarz A, Bogat GA. When social support fails: the homeless. J Community Psychol. 1990; 18(1): 79–96.
Tischler V, Rademeyer A, Vostanis P. Mothers experiencing homelessness: mental health, support, and social care needs. Health Soc Care Community. 2007; 15(3): 246–253.
Zugazaga CB. Understanding social support of the homeless: a comparison of single men, single women, and women with children. Fam Soc. 2008; 89(3): 447–455.
Stein JA, Dixon EL, Nyamathi AM. Effects of psychosocial and situational variables on substance abuse among homeless adults. Psychol Addict Behav. 2008; 22(3): 410–416.
Chayko M. The portable community: envisioning and examining mobile social connectedness. Int J Web Based Communities. 2007; 3(4): 373–385.
Rheingold H. Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Publishing; 2002.
Leung CS, Ho MM, Gundlapalli AV, Hwang SW. Homelessness and the response to emerging infectious disease outbreaks: lessons from SARS. J Urban Health. 2008; 85(3): 402–410.
Vlahov D, Coady MH, Ompad DC, Galea S. Strategies for improving influenza immunization rates among hard-to-reach populations. J Urban Health. 2007; 84(4): 615–631.
Kuntsche E, Robert B. Short message service (SMS) technology in alcohol research—a feasibility study. Alcohol Alcoholism. 2009; 44(4): 423–428.
Ybarra ML, Bull SS. Current trends in internet- and cell phone-based HIV prevention and intervention programs. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2007; 4: 201–207.
Brendryen H, Kraft P. Happy ending: a randomized controlled trial of a digital multi-media smoking cessation intervention. Addiction. 2008; 103: 478–484.
Obermayer JL, Riley WT, Asif O, Jean-Mary J. College smoking-cessation using cell phone text messaging. J Am Coll Health. 2004; 53(2): 71–78.
Miloh T, Annunziato R, Arnon R, et al. Improved adherence and outcomes for pediatric liver transplant recipients by using text messaging. Pediatrics. 2009; 124(5): 844–850.
Haller DM, Sanci LA, Patton GC, Sawyer SM. Text message communication in primary care research: a randomized controlled trial. Fam Pract. 2009; 26: 325–330.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to thank Temple University for the study leave and grant-in-aid supporting this work, Ms. Misty Sparks at the Bethesda Project Café for supplying space for interviewing, Mr. Jacob Bowling and Ms. Tarissa Sweat for assistance with interviewing, Ms. Julie Denlinger for assistance with data entry, Drs. Nick Garg and Cheryl Hyde for reviewing prior versions of this manuscript, and the 100 men and women who graciously volunteered to participate in this research study. A prior version of these findings was presented at the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Psychopathological Association in New York City on March 4, 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Eyrich-Garg, K.M. Mobile Phone Technology: A New Paradigm for the Prevention, Treatment, and Research of the Non-sheltered “Street” Homeless?. J Urban Health 87, 365–380 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9456-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9456-2